IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/revpoe/v21y2009i4p549-566.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Method, Structure and Argument in Edith Penrose's Theory of Growth

Author

Listed:
  • Carol Connell

Abstract

Edith Penrose's The Theory of the Growth of the Firm proposed a process theory of growth based on the pursuit and coordination of knowledge. From 1956 to 1973, Penrose began to focus on large international firms operating in developing countries. She found government to be a continuous input to the growth process. We argue here that Penrose was a heterodox economist, who followed the methodological style and structure of her Austrian mentor Fritz Machlup, embraced the neoclassical case study method of Marshall, and articulated a viewpoint on international growth that is much in line with Roy Harrod, Maurice Bye and Charles Kindleberger, who devoted considerable attention to why governments find it necessary to impose restraints on how such firms invest in their economies. The background and development of Penrose's work has implications for theory and policy, specifically for the Resource-based view which recognizes Penrose as its founder.

Suggested Citation

  • Carol Connell, 2009. "Method, Structure and Argument in Edith Penrose's Theory of Growth," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 549-566.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:21:y:2009:i:4:p:549-566
    DOI: 10.1080/09538250903214842
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09538250903214842
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Machlup, Fritz, 1978. "Methodology of Economics and Other Social Sciences," Elsevier Monographs, Elsevier, edition 1, number 9780124645509 edited by Shell, Karl.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:21:y:2009:i:4:p:549-566. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRPE20 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.