IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v36y2002i3p215-227.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Institutional Embeddedness of Project Networks: The Case of Content Production in German Television

Author

Listed:
  • Jorg Sydow
  • Udo Staber

Abstract

Project networks are an organizational form of production and exchange among functionally interdependent but legally autonomous firms and individuals. Although these networks are of limited duration, co-ordination of actors and activities takes place with respect to past experiences and future expectations. Project networks depend on supportive institutions in the surrounding organizational field to provide the regulative and normative resources within which practices are given meaning. In this paper, we explore the role of 'institutional thickness' for the performance of project networks in television content production in two media regions in Germany. We use GIDDENS', 1984, structuration perspective, to emphasize the dynamics and ambiguities of institutional processes. The analysis suggests that the two media regions differ in institutional thickness in ways which explain, at least in part, differences in the growth and viability of project networks. Les reseaux de projet constituent une forme organisationnelle de production et d'echange parmi des entreprises et des individus qui sont interdependants du point de vue fonctionnel mais autonomes sur le plan juridique. Malgre la duree de vie limitee de ces reseaux-la, la coordination des acteurs et des activites a lieu en fonction des experiences du passeet des attentes futures. Les reseaux de projet dependent des organismes de soutien situes dans le domaine organisationnel environnant afin de fournir les ressources regulatrices et normatives au sein desquelles les pratiques se voient donner un sens. Cet article cherche a examiner le role de l'ancrage institutionnel pour ce qui est de la performance des reseaux de projet dans la production du fond et de la forme dans la television de deux regions d'importance mediatique en Allemagne. On se sert de la perspective stucturante de GIDDENS, 1984, pour souligner la dynamique et l'ambiguite des processus institutionnels. L'analyse laisse voir que deux regions se distinguent du point de vie de leur ancrage institutionnel d'une facon qui explique, du moins en partie, les differences de la croissance et de la viabilite des reseaux de projet. Projektnetzwerke sind eine Organisationsform okonomischer Aktivitaten von zwar rechtlich selbstandigen, jedoch funktional interdependenten Unternehmungen bzw. Unternehmern, die fur eine begrenzte Zeit--ein Projekt--zusammenkommen, ihre Zusammenarbeit allerdings im Lichte ihrer bisherigen Erfahrungen und im Schatten ihrer zukunftigen Erwartungen koordinieren. Projektnetzwerke sind dabei auf die Unterstutzung durch Institutionen in dem organisationalen Feld angewiesen, die ihnen den Zugriff auf Ressourcen ermoglichen und Sinn und Legitimitat verfugbar machen. In diesem Beitrag wird die Rolle von "institutional thickness" fur die Performanz von Projektnetzwerken im Feld der Content-Produktion fur das Fernsehen in zwei deutschen Medienregionen untersucht. Dies geschieht auf der Grundlage der Giddens' schen Strukturationstheorie, die die Dynamik und Ambiguitat von Institutionalisierungsprozessen betont. Die Analyse zeigt, dass die zwei untersuchten Regionen sich hinsichtlich der institutionellen Dichte signifikant unterscheiden. Dies erklart--zumindest zum Teil--die Wachstums- und Erfolgsdifferenzen der Netzwerke und Regionen.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorg Sydow & Udo Staber, 2002. "The Institutional Embeddedness of Project Networks: The Case of Content Production in German Television," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 215-227.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:36:y:2002:i:3:p:215-227
    DOI: 10.1080/00343400220122034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343400220122034
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343400220122034?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christophe Midler, 1995. "Projectification of the Firm : the Renault Case," Post-Print hal-00262524, HAL.
    2. Hellgren, Bo & Stjernberg, Torbjörn, 1995. "Design and implementation in major investments -- A project network approach," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 377-394, December.
    3. Cooke, Philip & Gomez Uranga, Mikel & Etxebarria, Goio, 1997. "Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(4-5), pages 475-491, December.
    4. Midler, Christophe, 1995. ""Projectification" of the firm: The renault case," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 363-375, December.
    5. Ken Starkey & Christopher Barnatt & Sue Tempest, 2000. "Beyond Networks and Hierarchies: Latent Organizations in the U.K. Television Industry," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 299-305, June.
    6. Lundin, Rolf A. & Söderholm, Anders, 1995. "A theory of the temporary organization," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 437-455, December.
    7. Jörg Sydow & Arnold Windeler, 1998. "Organizing and Evaluating Interfirm Networks: A Structurationist Perspective on Network Processes and Effectiveness," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 265-284, June.
    8. Martin Gargiulo & Mario Benassi, 2000. "Trapped in Your Own Net? Network Cohesion, Structural Holes, and the Adaptation of Social Capital," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 183-196, April.
    9. Bart Nooteboom, 2000. "Learning by Interaction: Absorptive Capacity, Cognitive Distance and Governance," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 4(1), pages 69-92, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manning, Stephan, 2017. "The rise of project network organizations: Building core teams and flexible partner pools for interorganizational projects," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1399-1415.
    2. Peter B. Doeringer & Pacey Foster & Stephan Manning & David Terkla, 2013. "Project-based industries and craft-like production: structure, location and performance," Chapters, in: Frank Giarratani & Geoffrey J.D. Hewings & Philip McCann (ed.), Handbook of Industry Studies and Economic Geography, chapter 4, pages 99-151, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Gernot Grabher, 2002. "Cool Projects, Boring Institutions: Temporary Collaboration in Social Context," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 205-214.
    4. Kuura, Arvi & Blackburn, Robert A. & Lundin, Rolf A., 2014. "Entrepreneurship and projects—Linking segregated communities," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 214-230.
    5. David Dornisch, 2002. "The Evolution of Post-socialist Projects: Trajectory Shift and Transitional Capacity in a Polish Region," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 307-321.
    6. Hanisch, Bastian & Wald, Andreas, 2014. "Effects of complexity on the success of temporary organizations: Relationship quality and transparency as substitutes for formal coordination mechanisms," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 197-213.
    7. Shankar Sankaran & Mattias Jacobsson & Tomas Blomquist, 2021. "The history and future of projects as a transition innovation: Towards a sustainable project management framework," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 696-714, October.
    8. Stephan Manning & Daniel Roessler, 2014. "The Formation of Cross-Sector Development Partnerships: How Bridging Agents Shape Project Agendas and Longer-Term Alliances," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 123(3), pages 527-547, September.
    9. Alberto Marzucchi & Davide Antonioli & Sandro Montresor, 2012. "Research cooperation within and across regional boundaries. Does innovation policy add anything?," JRC Research Reports JRC76320, Joint Research Centre.
    10. Martin M�ller & Allison Stewart, 2016. "Does Temporary Geographical Proximity Predict Learning? Knowledge Dynamics in the Olympic Games," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(3), pages 377-390, March.
    11. Terrien, Clara & Maniak, Rémi & Chen, Bo & Shaheen, Susan, 2016. "Good Practices for Advancing Urban Mobility Innovation: A Case Study of One-Way Carsharing," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt53z3h2gt, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    12. Frédéric Segonds & Julien Nelson & Améziane Aoussat, 2012. "PLM and architectural rehabilitation : a framework to improve collaboration in the early stages of design," Post-Print hal-00719169, HAL.
    13. Wagner Reinhard F. & Radujkovic Mladen, 2022. "Effects of lagging projectification in the public sector on realizing infrastructure projects," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 2559-2570, January.
    14. Ibert, Oliver & Müller, Felix C., 2015. "Network dynamics in constellations of cultural differences: Relational distance in innovation processes in legal services and biotechnology," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 181-194.
    15. Małgorzata Ćwikła & Anna Góral & Ewa Bogacz-Wojtanowska & Magdalena Dudkiewicz, 2020. "Project-Based Work and Sustainable Development—A Comparative Case Study of Cultural Animation Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-24, August.
    16. repec:hal:journl:hal-01070044 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Hans Berends & Elco van Burg & Erik M. van Raaij, 2011. "Contacts and Contracts: Cross-Level Network Dynamics in the Development of an Aircraft Material," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 940-960, August.
    18. Turner, S. & Lourenço, A., 2010. "Competition and Public Service Broadcasting: Stimulating Creativity or servicing Capital?," Working Papers wp408, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    19. Thordur Vikingur Fridgeirsson & Helgi Thor Ingason & Haukur Ingi Jonasson & Bara Hlin Kristjansdottir, 2021. "The VUCAlity of Projects: A New Approach to Assess a Project Risk in a Complex World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-13, March.
    20. Martin Müller, 2014. "The Topological Multiplicities of Power: The Limits of Governing the Olympics," Economic Geography, Clark University, vol. 90(3), pages 321-339, July.
    21. Lars Frederiksen & Silvia Rita Sedita, 2005. "Embodied Knowledge Transfer Comparing inter-firm labor mobility in the music industry and manufacturing industries," DRUID Working Papers 05-14, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:36:y:2002:i:3:p:215-227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.