IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Comparing Regional Technical Efficiency in UK Manufacturing Plants: The Case of Northern Ireland 1974-1995

  • Richard Harris

This paper uses estimates based on the stochastic frontier production function approach applied to more than 200 four-digit UK manufacturing industries, covering the period 1974-95. It is shown that manufacturing plants in Northern Ireland on average operated at lower levels of technical efficiency when compared to their counterparts in other regions of the UK (and especially plants located in South East England). This lower level of efficiency in the province is analysed both at the aggregate level and the industry level. At the industry level the province has fewer plants exhibiting the highest levels of efficiency within most industries, and too few plants open and close to 'cleanse' manufacturing of the worst plants (and those plants that do open and close often do not have efficiency levels such as to bring about improvements to the aggregate efficiency level). The major conclusion is that Northern Ireland needs to reduce the long tail of weaker plants that tend to drag down average efficiency. One way of achieving this is for plant turnover to increase whereby less efficient plants are replaced by more efficient plants. Cet article emploie des estimations basees sur une fonction de production frontaliere stochastique appliquee entre 1974 et 1995 a plus de 200 industries de fabrication a 4 chiffres situees au Royaume-Uni. On laisse voir qu'en moyenne les niveaux d'efficacite technique des etablissements industriels situes en Irlande du Nord s'averent moins eleves compares a leurs equivalents situes dans d'autres regions du Royaume-Uni (notamment les etablissements situes dans le sud-est d'Angleterre). On analyse ce niveau d'efficacite technique moins eleve a la fois globalement et sur le plan industriel. Il est evident que sur le plan industriel la province a moins d'etablissements qui demontrent des niveaux d'efficacite des plus eleves au sein de la plupart des industries, et rares sont les etablissements qui ouvrent ou ferment afin de 'nettoyer' l'industrie des plus mauvais etablissements (et les etablissements qui ouvrent ou ferment n'ont pas souvent les niveaux d'efficacite necessaires a l'amelioration du niveau d'efficacite global). En guise de conclusion, on affirme qu'en Irlande du Nord il faut reduire la longue queue d'etablissements plus faibles qui ont tendance a rabaisser l'efficacite moyenne. Une solution; un taux de renouvellement plus rapide des etablissements, d'ou le remplacement des etablissements moins efficaces par des etablissements plus efficaces. Dieser Aufsatz benutzt Schatzungen, die sich auf den Ansatz der Funktion stochastischer Grenzproduktion stutzt, welche auf mehr als 200 vierstellige Betriebe der herstellenden Industrie im Vereinigten Konigreich im Zeitraum 1974-1995 angewendet wird. Es wird gezeigt, dass herstellende Betriebe in Nordirland im Durchschnitt niedrigere Stufen technischer Leistung erreichten als vergleichbare Gegenstucke in anderen Regionen des UK (und besonders am Standort Sudostengland). Der geringere Leistungsstand in der Provinz Nordirland wird sowohl auf Gesamthohe wie auf industrielles Niveau einzelner Industrien hin analysiert. Auf industrieller Ebene gibt es in Nordirland in den meisten Industriebranchen weniger Betriebe, in denen Spitzenleistungen erreicht wurden, und zu wenig Betriebseroffnungen und - schliessungen um die herstellende Industrie von den schlimmsten Betrieben zu befreien, und diejenigen, die eroffnet oder geschlossen werden, erreichen nicht die Leistungsstande, die dazu geeignet waren, eine Verbesserung der Gesamtleistungshohe zu bewirken. Die Hauptschlussfolgerung lauft darauf hinaus, dass Nordirland die hohe Anzahl schwacher Nachzuglerbetriebe verringern muss, die Durchschnittsleistung hinunterziehen. Dies konnte durch vermehrte Betriebsaufhebung und-neugrundung erreicht werden, wobei weniger leistungsfahige Betriebe durch leistungsfahigere ersetzt werden.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Regional Studies.

Volume (Year): 35 (2001)
Issue (Month): 6 ()
Pages: 519-534

in new window

Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:35:y:2001:i:6:p:519-534
Contact details of provider: Web page:

Order Information: Web:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

as in new window
  1. Eric J. Bartelsman & Mark Doms, 2000. "Understanding productivity: lessons from longitudinal microdata," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2000-19, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
  2. Richard Disney & Jonathan Haskel & Ylva Heden, 2003. "Restructuring and productivity growth in uk manufacturing," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 113(489), pages 666-694, 07.
  3. Lucia Foster & John Haltiwanger & C.J. Krizan, 1998. "Aggregate Productivity Growth: Lessons from Microeconomic Evidence," NBER Working Papers 6803, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  4. Pitt, Mark M. & Lee, Lung-Fei, 1981. "The measurement and sources of technical inefficiency in the Indonesian weaving industry," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 43-64, August.
  5. Schmidt, Peter & Sickles, Robin C, 1984. "Production Frontiers and Panel Data," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 2(4), pages 367-74, October.
  6. Van Ewijk, Casper, 1997. "Entry and Exit, Cycles, and Productivity Growth," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(2), pages 167-87, April.
  7. Cornwell, Christopher & Schmidt, Peter & Sickles, Robin C., 1990. "Production frontiers with cross-sectional and time-series variation in efficiency levels," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1-2), pages 185-200.
  8. Jeffrey Campbell, 1998. "Entry, Exit, Embodied Technology, and Business Cycles," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 1(2), pages 371-408, April.
  9. Stephen Young & Ping Lan, 1997. "Technology Transfer to China through Foreign Direct Investment," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(7), pages 669-679.
  10. Griffith, Rachel, 1999. "Using the ARD Establishment Level Data to Look at Foreign Ownership and Productivity in the United Kingdom," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 109(456), pages F416-42, June.
  11. Battese, George E. & Coelli, Tim J., 1988. "Prediction of firm-level technical efficiencies with a generalized frontier production function and panel data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 387-399, July.
  12. Harris, Richard I D & Drinkwater, Stephen, 2000. " UK Plant and Machinery Capital Stocks and Plant Closures," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 62(2), pages 243-65, May.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:35:y:2001:i:6:p:519-534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.