IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v30y1996i5p477-492.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

State Government Efforts in Industrial Modernization: Using Theory to Guide Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Ross Gittell
  • Allen Kaufman

Abstract

GITTELL R. J. and KAUFMAN A. (1996) State government efforts in industrial modernization: using theory to guide practice, Reg. Studies 30, 477-492. This paper presents a theoretical framework that incorporates economic and political considerations to gain insight into state government industrial modernization efforts. The discussion highlights how information asymmetries and 'traditional' business norms may justify the organization of a public manufacturing extension service. We suggest, however, that if left solely to private or to public means, one might expect either the provision of too few or too many manufacturing extension services. Difficulties in calculating benefits and in sharing information can inhibit spontaneous private collective action. On the other hand we suggest that public officials have incentives to institute manufacturing services independent of private demand. To balance private and public incentives we suggest the need for a public-private partnership, along with specific recommendations for manufacturing extension service programme design. GITTELL R. J. et KAUFMAN A. (1996) Les efforts de l'administration au niveau national dans le domaine de la modernisation industrielle: la theorie au service de la pratique, Reg. Studies 30, 477-492. Cet article presente une base theorique qui comporte des considerations economiques et politiques afin d'arriver a mieux connaitre les efforts de l'administration au niveau national dans le domaine de la modernisation industrielle. La discussion souligne comment les asymetries d'information et les normes commerciales “traditionnelles” peuvent justifier l'etablissement d'un service public industriel elargi. Cependant, on suggere qu'on pourrait s'attendre a l'offre soit de trop peu de soit de trop de services industriels elargis dans le cas ou on la laisserait entierement aux moyens ou prives ou publics. Les difficultes du calcul des avantages et du partage de l'information peuvent empecher l'action collective privee spontanee. De l'autre cote, on suggere que les fonctionnaires ont tout interet a etablir des services industriels independamment de la demande privee. Dans le but d'equilibrer les interets prives et publics, on propose un partenariat a la fois public et prive, conjointement avec des recommendations specifiques a la conception d'un programme de services industriels elargis. GITTELL R. A. und KAUFMAN A. (1996) Bemuhungen der Landesregierung um Modernisierung der Industrie: Ratgeber fur die Praxis, Reg. Studies 30, 477-492. Dieser Aufsatz legt einen theoretischen Rahmen vor, der wirtschaftliche und politische Erwagungen einbezieht, um Einsicht in die Anstrengungen der Landesregierung bezuglich Modernisierung der Industrie zu gewinnen. Die Diskussion erhellt die Art und Weise, in der Informationssymmetrien und “traditionelle” Geschaftsnormen eine Berechtigung fur die Einrichtung eines offentlichen Herstellerberatungsdienstes darstellen konnten. Es konnte jedoch sein, dass sich entweder zu wenige oder zu viele Herstellerberatungsdienste auftun, wenn dies privaten oder offentlichen Mitteln allein uberlassen bleibt. Schwierigkeiten bei der Berechnung des Nutzens und beim zur Verfugungstellen von Information konnen spontanes, nicht-offentliches Gemeinschaftshandeln hemmen. Andrerseits wird vorgeschlagen, offentlichen Angestellten unabhangig von privater Nachfrage Anreize zu geben, Herstellerdienstleistungen einzurichten, und daruberhinaus private und offentlich Anreize durch Partnerschaft des offentlichen mit dem privaten Sektor sowie spezifische Empfehlungen fur den Entwurf eines Programms fur Herstellerberatungsdienste auszugleichen.

Suggested Citation

  • Ross Gittell & Allen Kaufman, 1996. "State Government Efforts in Industrial Modernization: Using Theory to Guide Practice," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(5), pages 477-492.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:30:y:1996:i:5:p:477-492
    DOI: 10.1080/00343409612331349798
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343409612331349798
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343409612331349798?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anonymous, 1991. "The Automobile Industry," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 65(4), pages 1-1, January.
    2. Peltzman, Sam, 1987. "Economic Conditions and Gubernatorial Elections," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 77(2), pages 293-297, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ross Gittell & Allen Kaufman & Marvin Karson & Ron McChesney, 2000. "The New Economic Geography of the States," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 14(2), pages 182-193, May.
    2. Izushi, Hiro, 2003. "Impact of the length of relationships upon the use of research institutes by SMEs," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 771-788, May.
    3. Hiro Izushi, 2002. "The ‘Voice’ Approach of Trade Associations: Support for SMEs Accessing a Research Institute," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 20(3), pages 439-454, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rodrigo Martins & Francisco Veiga, 2013. "Economic voting in Portuguese municipal elections," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 155(3), pages 317-334, June.
    2. Ruigrok, Winfried & Tate, John J, 1995. "Public Testing And Research Centers In Japan," UCAIS Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, Working Paper Series qt3581k5pd, UCAIS Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, UC Berkeley.
    3. Paul R. Blackley & Edward M. Shepard, 1994. "A Statistical Analysis of the Effect of State-Level Economic Conditions On the 1992 Presidential Election," Public Finance Review, , vol. 22(3), pages 366-382, July.
    4. Susan Helper & Mari Sako, 2010. "Management innovation in supply chain: appreciating Chandler in the twenty-first century," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 19(2), pages 399-429, April.
    5. repec:dgr:rugsom:97b05 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. A Lagendijk & G A van der Knaap, 1993. "Foreign Involvement in the Spanish Automobile Industry: Internalising versus Networking," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 25(11), pages 1663-1676, November.
    7. Gábor Péli & Bart Nooteboom, 1997. "Simulation of Learning in Supply Partnerships," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 43-66, March.
    8. Sam Peltzman, 2017. "An Economist's Most Regrettable Statement," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 14(2), pages 293–294-2, May.
    9. repec:dgr:rugsom:95b39 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Ali T. Akarca & Aysit Tansel, 2003. "Economic Performance and Political Outcomes: An Analysis of The 1995 Turkish Parliamentary Election Results," Working Papers 0321, Economic Research Forum, revised Jul 2003.
    11. Maria Rosário Moreira & Rui Alves, 2006. "How far from Just-in-time are Portuguese firms? A survey of its progress and perception," FEP Working Papers 215, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    12. Paola Assael & Felipe Larraín, 1994. "El Ciclo Político-económico: Teoría, Evidencia y Extensión para una Economía Abierta," Latin American Journal of Economics-formerly Cuadernos de Economía, Instituto de Economía. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile., vol. 31(92), pages 87-114.
    13. Hakan Yilmazkuday, 2011. "Oil Shocks through International Transport Costs: Evidence from U.S. Business Cycles," Working Papers 1105, Florida International University, Department of Economics.
    14. Henderson, Rebecca., 1994. "The evolution of integrative capability : innovation in cardiovascular drug discovery," Working papers 3711-94., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    15. Timothy Besley & Anne Case, 2003. "Political Institutions and Policy Choices: Evidence from the United States," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 41(1), pages 7-73, March.
    16. Paolo G. Garella & Martin Peitz, 2000. "Intermediation Can Replace Certification," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(1), pages 1-24, March.
    17. Elhanan Helpman, 2006. "Trade, FDI, and the Organization of Firms," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 44(3), pages 589-630, September.
    18. Terry A. Taylor & Erica L. Plambeck, 2007. "Simple Relational Contracts to Motivate Capacity Investment: Price Only vs. Price and Quantity," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 9(1), pages 94-113, January.
    19. Mariagiovanna Baccara, 2007. "Outsourcing, information leakage, and consulting firms," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 38(1), pages 269-289, March.
    20. Gikas A. Hardouvelis & Dimitrios D. Thomakos, 2007. "Consumer Confidence and Elections," Working Paper series 42_07, Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis.
    21. Iain Cockburn & Rebecca Henderson & Scott Stern, 1999. "The Diffusion of Science-Driven Drug Discovery: Organizational Change in Pharmaceutical Research," NBER Working Papers 7359, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    22. Kenji Kojima, 2000. "Japanese Supplier Relations: A Comparative Perspective," Kobe Economic & Business Review, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University, vol. 44, pages 53-76, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:30:y:1996:i:5:p:477-492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.