IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ragrxx/v55y2016i4p483-508.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Real-Time Grain Commodities Price Predictions in South Africa: A Big Data and Neural Networks Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Kayode Ayankoya
  • Andre P. Calitz
  • Jean H. Greyling

Abstract

The prices of agricultural grain commodities are known to be volatile due to several factors that influence these prices. Moreover, different combinations of these factors, such as demand, supply and macroeconomic indicators are responsible for the price volatility at different times. Big Data presents opportunities to collect and integrate datasets from several sources for the purpose of discovering useful patterns and extracting actionable insights that can be used to gain competitive advantage or improve decision making. Neural Networks presents research opportunities for training computer algorithms to model linear and non-linear patterns that might exist in datasets for the purpose of extracting actionable insights such as making predictions. This article proposes a Big Data and Neural Networks approach for predicting prices of grain commodities in South Africa. It was identified that disparate data that influence the grain commodities market can be acquired, integrated and analysed in real-time to predict future prices of grain commodities. By utilising SAP HANA as the enabling Big Data technology, data acquired from several sources was used to create an integrated dataset, and a predictive model was developed using Backpropagation Neural Network algorithms. This model was used to predict the daily spot prices of white maize on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) at the end of each trading day. The initial results indicate that the approach can be scientifically used to predict future prices of grain commodities in a real-time environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Kayode Ayankoya & Andre P. Calitz & Jean H. Greyling, 2016. "Real-Time Grain Commodities Price Predictions in South Africa: A Big Data and Neural Networks Approach," Agrekon, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(4), pages 483-508, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ragrxx:v:55:y:2016:i:4:p:483-508
    DOI: 10.1080/03031853.2016.1243060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03031853.2016.1243060
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03031853.2016.1243060?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Irwin, Scott H. & Sanders, Dwight R. & Merrin, Robert P., 2009. "Devil or Angel? The Role of Speculation in the Recent Commodity Price Boom (and Bust)," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 41(2), August.
    2. Christopher Bennett & Rodney A. Stewart & Junwei Lu, 2014. "Autoregressive with Exogenous Variables and Neural Network Short-Term Load Forecast Models for Residential Low Voltage Distribution Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-23, April.
    3. M.M. Venter & D.B. Strydom & B. Grové, 2013. "Stochastic efficiency analysis of alternative basic grain marketing strategies," Agrekon, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(sup1), pages 46-63, March.
    4. Brian D. Wright, 2014. "Data at our fingertips, myths in our minds: recent grain price jumps as the ‘perfect storm’," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 58(4), pages 538-553, October.
    5. Chris Tofallis, 2015. "A better measure of relative prediction accuracy for model selection and model estimation," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 66(8), pages 1352-1362, August.
    6. Jordaan, Henry & Grove, Bennie & Jooste, Andre & Alemu, A.G., 2007. "Measuring the Price Volatility of Certain Field Crops in South Africa using the ARCH/GARCH Approach," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 46(3), pages 1-17, September.
    7. Brian D. Wright, 2011. "The Economics of Grain Price Volatility," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 33(1), pages 32-58.
    8. Chris Tofallis, 2015. "A better measure of relative prediction accuracy for model selection and model estimation," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 66(3), pages 524-524, March.
    9. Wright, Brian D., 2014. "Data at our fingertips, myths in our minds: recent grain price jumps as the ‘perfect storm’," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 58(4), October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaojie Xu & Yun Zhang, 2022. "Commodity price forecasting via neural networks for coffee, corn, cotton, oats, soybeans, soybean oil, sugar, and wheat," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(3), pages 169-181, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chimaliro, Aubrey Victor, 2018. "Analysis of main determinants of soya bean price volatility in Malawi," Research Theses 334743, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    2. Fabio Gaetano Santeramo & Emilia Lamonaca & Francesco Contò & Gianluca Nardone & Antonio Stasi, 2018. "Drivers of grain price volatility: a cursory critical review," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(8), pages 347-356.
    3. Kornher, Lukas & Kalkuhl, Matthias, 2013. "Food Price Volatility in Developing Countries and its Determinants," Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, Humboldt-Universitaat zu Berlin, vol. 52(4), pages 1-32, November.
    4. Vasile Brătian & Ana-Maria Acu & Camelia Oprean-Stan & Emil Dinga & Gabriela-Mariana Ionescu, 2021. "Efficient or Fractal Market Hypothesis? A Stock Indexes Modelling Using Geometric Brownian Motion and Geometric Fractional Brownian Motion," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(22), pages 1-20, November.
    5. Rahman A. Prasojo & Karunika Diwyacitta & Suwarno & Harry Gumilang, 2017. "Transformer Paper Expected Life Estimation Using ANFIS Based on Oil Characteristics and Dissolved Gases (Case Study: Indonesian Transformers)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, August.
    6. Díaz, Guzmán & Coto, José & Gómez-Aleixandre, Javier, 2019. "Prediction and explanation of the formation of the Spanish day-ahead electricity price through machine learning regression," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 610-625.
    7. Stetco, Adrian & Dinmohammadi, Fateme & Zhao, Xingyu & Robu, Valentin & Flynn, David & Barnes, Mike & Keane, John & Nenadic, Goran, 2019. "Machine learning methods for wind turbine condition monitoring: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 620-635.
    8. Tuttle, Jacob F. & Blackburn, Landen D. & Andersson, Klas & Powell, Kody M., 2021. "A systematic comparison of machine learning methods for modeling of dynamic processes applied to combustion emission rate modeling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    9. Kim, Sungil & Kim, Heeyoung, 2016. "A new metric of absolute percentage error for intermittent demand forecasts," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 669-679.
    10. Marijana Zekić-Sušac & Marinela Knežević & Rudolf Scitovski, 2021. "Modeling the cost of energy in public sector buildings by linear regression and deep learning," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 29(1), pages 307-322, March.
    11. Guo, Wei & Liu, Qingfu & Luo, Zhidan & Tse, Yiuman, 2022. "Forecasts for international financial series with VMD algorithms," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    12. Michael S. O’Donnell & Daniel J. Manier, 2022. "Spatial Estimates of Soil Moisture for Understanding Ecological Potential and Risk: A Case Study for Arid and Semi-Arid Ecosystems," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-37, October.
    13. Man Sing Wong & Tingneng Wang & Hung Chak Ho & Coco Y. T. Kwok & Keru Lu & Sawaid Abbas, 2018. "Towards a Smart City: Development and Application of an Improved Integrated Environmental Monitoring System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, February.
    14. Zekić-Sušac Marijana & Scitovski Rudolf & Has Adela, 2018. "Cluster analysis and artificial neural networks in predicting energy efficiency of public buildings as a cost-saving approach," Croatian Review of Economic, Business and Social Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 4(2), pages 57-66, November.
    15. Paolo Berta & Paolo Paruolo & Stefano Verzillo & Pietro Giorgio Lovaglio, 2020. "A bivariate prediction approach for adapting the health care system response to the spread of COVID-19," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-14, October.
    16. Shivaram Subramanian & Pavithra Harsha, 2021. "Demand Modeling in the Presence of Unobserved Lost Sales," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 3803-3833, June.
    17. Agnese Maria Di Brisco & Enea Giuseppe Bongiorno & Aldo Goia & Sonia Migliorati, 2023. "Bayesian flexible beta regression model with functional covariate," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 623-645, June.
    18. Robert Czudaj & Joscha Beckmann, 2012. "Spot and futures commodity markets and the unbiasedness hypothesis - evidence from a novel panel unit root test," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 32(2), pages 1695-1707.
    19. Ming Yin & Feiya Lu & Xingxuan Zhuo & Wangzi Yao & Jialong Liu & Jijiao Jiang, 2024. "Prediction of daily tourism volume based on maximum correlation minimum redundancy feature selection and long short‐term memory network," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(2), pages 344-365, March.
    20. Guo, Lin & Zhang, Ben, 2019. "Mining structural influence to analyze relationships in social network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 523(C), pages 301-309.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ragrxx:v:55:y:2016:i:4:p:483-508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ragr20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.