IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/cejnor/v29y2021i1d10.1007_s10100-019-00643-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling the cost of energy in public sector buildings by linear regression and deep learning

Author

Listed:
  • Marijana Zekić-Sušac

    (University of Josip Juraj Strossmayer in Osijek)

  • Marinela Knežević

    (University of Josip Juraj Strossmayer in Osijek)

  • Rudolf Scitovski

    (University of Josip Juraj Strossmayer in Osijek)

Abstract

Modeling the cost of energy consumption of public buildings is vital for planning reconstruction measures in the public sector. The methods of predictive analytics have not been sufficiently exploited in this domain. This paper aimed to create a model for predicting the cost of the total energy consumption of a building based on deep learning (DL) and compare it to the standard linear regression (MLR), as well to identify key predictors that can significantly influence the cost of energy. An algorithm for modeling procedure is proposed which includes data pre-processing, variable reduction procedures, training and testing MLR and deep neural networks (DNN) and, finally, performance evaluation. Variable reduction in the MLR model was conducted by a backward procedure; while in DNN, the Olden method was used. The algorithm was tested on a high-dimensional real dataset of Croatian public buildings. The results showed that there is a statistically significant difference in the distribution of DNN predictions and distribution of actual values in the validation set, as opposed to distribution of MLR predictions and real values. However, DNN model had a lower normalized root mean square error, while the MLR model had a lower symmetric mean average error. Those findings reveal the potential of DL for solving this type of problems but also the need for more advanced algorithms adjusted to deal with large-range numeric outputs. The created models could be implemented in public sector business intelligence systems to support policy and decision makers in allocating resources for building reconstructions.

Suggested Citation

  • Marijana Zekić-Sušac & Marinela Knežević & Rudolf Scitovski, 2021. "Modeling the cost of energy in public sector buildings by linear regression and deep learning," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 29(1), pages 307-322, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:cejnor:v:29:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10100-019-00643-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10100-019-00643-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10100-019-00643-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10100-019-00643-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Djula Borozan & Luka Borozan, 2018. "Analyzing total-factor energy efficiency in Croatian counties: evidence from a non-parametric approach," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 26(3), pages 673-694, September.
    2. Kemp, Stanley J. & Zaradic, Patricia & Hansen, Frank, 2007. "An approach for determining relative input parameter importance and significance in artificial neural networks," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 204(3), pages 326-334.
    3. Chris Tofallis, 2015. "A better measure of relative prediction accuracy for model selection and model estimation," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 66(8), pages 1352-1362, August.
    4. Radek Hrebik & Jaromir Kukal & Josef Jablonsky, 2019. "Optimal unions of hidden classes," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 27(1), pages 161-177, March.
    5. Chris Tofallis, 2015. "A better measure of relative prediction accuracy for model selection and model estimation," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 66(3), pages 524-524, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vasile Brătian & Ana-Maria Acu & Camelia Oprean-Stan & Emil Dinga & Gabriela-Mariana Ionescu, 2021. "Efficient or Fractal Market Hypothesis? A Stock Indexes Modelling Using Geometric Brownian Motion and Geometric Fractional Brownian Motion," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(22), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Rahman A. Prasojo & Karunika Diwyacitta & Suwarno & Harry Gumilang, 2017. "Transformer Paper Expected Life Estimation Using ANFIS Based on Oil Characteristics and Dissolved Gases (Case Study: Indonesian Transformers)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Stetco, Adrian & Dinmohammadi, Fateme & Zhao, Xingyu & Robu, Valentin & Flynn, David & Barnes, Mike & Keane, John & Nenadic, Goran, 2019. "Machine learning methods for wind turbine condition monitoring: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 620-635.
    4. Tuttle, Jacob F. & Blackburn, Landen D. & Andersson, Klas & Powell, Kody M., 2021. "A systematic comparison of machine learning methods for modeling of dynamic processes applied to combustion emission rate modeling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    5. Kim, Sungil & Kim, Heeyoung, 2016. "A new metric of absolute percentage error for intermittent demand forecasts," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 669-679.
    6. Paolo Berta & Paolo Paruolo & Stefano Verzillo & Pietro Giorgio Lovaglio, 2020. "A bivariate prediction approach for adapting the health care system response to the spread of COVID-19," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-14, October.
    7. Ming Yin & Feiya Lu & Xingxuan Zhuo & Wangzi Yao & Jialong Liu & Jijiao Jiang, 2024. "Prediction of daily tourism volume based on maximum correlation minimum redundancy feature selection and long short‐term memory network," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(2), pages 344-365, March.
    8. Guo, Lin & Zhang, Ben, 2019. "Mining structural influence to analyze relationships in social network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 523(C), pages 301-309.
    9. Wen, Xin & Jaxa-Rozen, Marc & Trutnevyte, Evelina, 2022. "Accuracy indicators for evaluating retrospective performance of energy system models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    10. Warwick Smith & Anca M. Hanea & Mark A. Burgman, 2022. "Can Groups Improve Expert Economic and Financial Forecasts?," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-18, August.
    11. Fanwei Zhu & Wendong Xiao & Yao Yu & Ziyi Wang & Zulong Chen & Quan Lu & Zemin Liu & Minghui Wu & Shenghua Ni, 2022. "Modeling Price Elasticity for Occupancy Prediction in Hotel Dynamic Pricing," Papers 2208.03135, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2022.
    12. Theocharides, Spyros & Makrides, George & Livera, Andreas & Theristis, Marios & Kaimakis, Paris & Georghiou, George E., 2020. "Day-ahead photovoltaic power production forecasting methodology based on machine learning and statistical post-processing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    13. Desen Kirli & Maximilian Parzen & Aristides Kiprakis, 2021. "Impact of the COVID-19 Lockdown on the Electricity System of Great Britain: A Study on Energy Demand, Generation, Pricing and Grid Stability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-25, January.
    14. Puchalsky, Weslly & Ribeiro, Gabriel Trierweiler & da Veiga, Claudimar Pereira & Freire, Roberto Zanetti & Santos Coelho, Leandro dos, 2018. "Agribusiness time series forecasting using Wavelet neural networks and metaheuristic optimization: An analysis of the soybean sack price and perishable products demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 174-189.
    15. Colin Singleton & Peter Grindrod, 2021. "Forecasting for Battery Storage: Choosing the Error Metric," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-11, October.
    16. Croonenbroeck, Carsten & Hüttel, Silke, 2017. "Quantifying the economic efficiency impact of inaccurate renewable energy price forecasts," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 767-774.
    17. Luca Di Persio & Nicola Fraccarolo, 2023. "Energy Consumption Forecasts by Gradient Boosting Regression Trees," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, February.
    18. Kraus, Mathias & Feuerriegel, Stefan & Oztekin, Asil, 2020. "Deep learning in business analytics and operations research: Models, applications and managerial implications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 281(3), pages 628-641.
    19. Vasconcelos de Deus, Joseph David Barroso & de Mendonça, Helder Ferreira, 2017. "Fiscal forecasting performance in an emerging economy: An empirical assessment of Brazil," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 408-419.
    20. Xu Gong & Boqiang Lin, 2021. "Effects of structural changes on the prediction of downside volatility in futures markets," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(7), pages 1124-1153, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:cejnor:v:29:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10100-019-00643-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.