IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oaefxx/v10y2022i1p2141884.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fuzzy structural risk of default for banks in Southern Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Ephraim Matanda
  • Eriyoti Chikodza
  • Farai Kwenda

Abstract

This paper proposes and examines a new structural risk of default model for banks in frictional and fuzzy financial markets. It is motivated by the need to fill the shortcomings of probability-based credit risk metric models that are characterised by unrealistic assumptions such as crisply precise and constant risk-free rates of return. The problem investigated here specifically proposes a new Kealhofer–Merton–Vasicek (KMV)-type model for estimation of the risk of default for banks extended for both market friction represented by transaction costs and uncertainty modelled by fuzziness. The novel risk of default model is then validated using cross-sectional financial data of eight commercial banks drawn from several emerging economies in Southern Africa. The results from the proposed model are fairly stable and consistent compared to those from hazard function and structural credit risk models currently used in the markets. The model is relevant in that it fairly captures practical conditions faced by banks that influence their risks of default in their quest to improve financial performance and shareholders’ wealth. The study recommends that banks in frictional and fuzzy financial markets, such as those in emerging economies, can adopt and implement the proposed risk of the default model.

Suggested Citation

  • Ephraim Matanda & Eriyoti Chikodza & Farai Kwenda, 2022. "Fuzzy structural risk of default for banks in Southern Africa," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 2141884-214, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:10:y:2022:i:1:p:2141884
    DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2022.2141884
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23322039.2022.2141884
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23322039.2022.2141884?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:10:y:2022:i:1:p:2141884. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/OAEF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.