IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Application of the public benefit test to the air New Zealand/Qantas case

Listed author(s):
  • Tim Hazledine
Registered author(s):

    The proposed cartel between Air New Zealand was rejected by the NZ Commerce Commission, supported on appeal by the High Court. The case was an important and interesting application of the Net Public Benefit test in competition policy, under which the assessed costs or detriments of a determined substantial lessening of competition (SLC) are weighed against any offsetting benefits, for the purposes of authorisation. In this paper quantification of the detriments is shown to depend on the identity of those affected - consumers/producers; New Zealand/Australian/foreign. Impacts on the long-run performance of markets and on related markets were claimed and are evaluated. The basic legitimacy of the public benefit test in this context is assessed, in terms both of the purpose of the NZ anti-trust legislation and of the economics of long-term market performance. The much simpler traditional SLC-focussed implementation of anti-trust might perform better overall.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal New Zealand Economic Papers.

    Volume (Year): 38 (2004)
    Issue (Month): 2 ()
    Pages: 279-298

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:taf:nzecpp:v:38:y:2004:i:2:p:279-298
    DOI: 10.1080/00779950409544407
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:nzecpp:v:38:y:2004:i:2:p:279-298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.