The technology gap and the limit of imitation: An inspection of the strategy of 'exchanging market for technology'
Has China's strategy of 'exchanging market for technology' been successful? This paper analyses the effectiveness of this strategy based on the duopoly model of vertical product differentiation by Choi and Shin (1992). It is shown that the outcome is influenced by technology gap and absorptive capacity. The profit of a developing country firm shows an inverted U-shaped relationship with its technology level when holding the foreign firm's technology level constant. In the process of technology improvement by imitation, the developing country firm faces a limit on imitation. A developing country may benefit from the strategy of 'exchanging market for technology' at the early stage and needs to bring in FDI with advanced technology so that it can overcome restraints from the limit of imitation. For one with a smaller technology gap with the home country of FDI, the country in the long run has to achieve technological progress through innovation.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 7 (2009)
Issue (Month): 4 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCEA20|
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RCEA20|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jocebs:v:7:y:2009:i:4:p:447-455. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.