IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurjfi/v16y2010i8p743-752.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Numerical solution of the sequential investment model: a note on Dixit and Pindyck's (1994) analysis

Author

Listed:
  • R. H. Berry
  • S. X. Zuo

Abstract

This paper discusses the model and solution approach adopted by Majd and Pindyck (1987. Time to build, option value, and investment decisions. Journal of Financial Economics 18, March: 7-27) and Dixit and Pindyck (1994. Investment under uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press), when considering the sequential investment decision. It is shown that specific results presented in these two sources are based on invalid solutions to the relevant partial differential equation. The problem stems from the possibility that economically feasible parameter values and apparently acceptable step sizes for the explicit finite difference approach used can combine to generate non-convergent, invalid solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • R. H. Berry & S. X. Zuo, 2010. "Numerical solution of the sequential investment model: a note on Dixit and Pindyck's (1994) analysis," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(8), pages 743-752.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurjfi:v:16:y:2010:i:8:p:743-752
    DOI: 10.1080/13518470903314469
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13518470903314469
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13518470903314469?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wilmott,Paul & Howison,Sam & Dewynne,Jeff, 1995. "The Mathematics of Financial Derivatives," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521497893, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Buchen & Otto Konstandatos, 2005. "A New Method Of Pricing Lookback Options," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(2), pages 245-259, April.
    2. George Chang, 2018. "Examining the Efficiency of American Put Option Pricing by Monte Carlo Methods with Variance Reduction," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(2), pages 10-13, February.
    3. Jiao Li, 2016. "Trading VIX Futures under Mean Reversion with Regime Switching," Papers 1605.07945, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2016.
    4. Moon, Yongma & Baran, Mesut, 2018. "Economic analysis of a residential PV system from the timing perspective: A real option model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 783-795.
    5. Zaheer Imdad & Tusheng Zhang, 2014. "Pricing European options in a delay model with jumps," Journal of Financial Engineering (JFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 1(04), pages 1-13.
    6. San-Lin Chung & Mark Shackleton, 2005. "On the use and improvement of Hull and White's control variate technique," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(16), pages 1171-1179.
    7. Tarn Driffield & Peter C. Smith, 2007. "A Real Options Approach to Watchful Waiting: Theory and an Illustration," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 27(2), pages 178-188, March.
    8. Xueping Wu & Jin Zhang, 1999. "Options on the minimum or the maximum of two average prices," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 183-204, May.
    9. Peter Buchen & Otto Konstandatos, 2009. "A New Approach to Pricing Double-Barrier Options with Arbitrary Payoffs and Exponential Boundaries," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(6), pages 497-515.
    10. Kenji Hamatani & Masao Fukushima, 2011. "Pricing American options with uncertain volatility through stochastic linear complementarity models," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 263-286, October.
    11. Moriconi, L., 2007. "Delta hedged option valuation with underlying non-Gaussian returns," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 380(C), pages 343-350.
    12. Masatoshi Miyake & Hiroshi Inoue & Satoru Takahashi, 2011. "Option Pricing For Weighted Average Of Asset Prices," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 28(05), pages 651-672.
    13. Ulm, Eric R., 2014. "Analytic solution for ratchet guaranteed minimum death benefit options under a variety of mortality laws," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 14-23.
    14. Xiaolin Luo & Pavel V. Shevchenko, 2014. "Fast and simple method for pricing exotic options using Gauss–Hermite quadrature on a cubic spline interpolation," Journal of Financial Engineering (JFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 1(04), pages 1-31.
    15. Conrad, Jon M. & Kotani, Koji, 2005. "When to drill? Trigger prices for the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 273-286, November.
    16. Philippe Jacquinot & Nikolay Sukhomlin, 2010. "A direct formulation of implied volatility in the Black-Scholes model," Post-Print hal-02533014, HAL.
    17. Gao, Pei-wang, 2009. "Options strategies with the risk adjustment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(3), pages 975-980, February.
    18. Saphores, Jean-Daniel & Gravel, Éric & Bernard, Jean-Thomas, 2003. "Environmental Impact Assessment and Investment under Uncertainty. An Application to Power Grid Interconnection," Cahiers de recherche 0303, GREEN.
    19. L. Ingber & J.K. Wilson, 1999. "Volatility of volatility of financial markets," Lester Ingber Papers 99vv, Lester Ingber.
    20. Alexander Buryak & Ivan Guo, 2014. "New analytic approach to address Put - Call parity violation due to discrete dividends," Papers 1407.7328, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurjfi:v:16:y:2010:i:8:p:743-752. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REJF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.