IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/euract/v4y1995i3p485-514.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Auditing in Britain and Germany compared: professions, knowledge and the state

Author

Listed:
  • Holger Vieten

Abstract

In an attempt to move away from dichotomous expositions of state-run Germany and self-regulated Britain this paper seeks to analyse the regulation of auditing in terms of a state-profession axis (Hopwood, 1988: 559) that shifts over time. Stereotypical beliefs of Britain and Germany representing diametrically opposite systems of regulation can be contradicted in the light of increasing state involvement in Britain and the recognition that the German system is not adequately characterized by rigid and exhaustive codification, but relies to a significant degree on professional expertise. However, differences do exist, especially in the nature of regulation, which takes an informal shape in Britain, and in the production and diffusion of knowledge where academics and preparers are much more involved in Germany. The case of auditor independence illustrates some of the similarities and differences exposed by an analysis that aims to interpret regulatory systems in their national and historical context rather than producing simplistic general models.

Suggested Citation

  • Holger Vieten, 1995. "Auditing in Britain and Germany compared: professions, knowledge and the state," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 485-514.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:4:y:1995:i:3:p:485-514
    DOI: 10.1080/09638189500000029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09638189500000029
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gietzmann, M. B. & Quick, R., 1998. "Capping auditor liability: The German experience," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 81-103, January.
    2. Maria Antonia Garcia Benau & Emiliano Ruiz Barbadillo & Christopher Humphrey & Walid Al Husaini, 1999. "Success in failure? Reflections on the changing Spanish audit environment," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(4), pages 701-730.
    3. McLeay, Stuart & Ordelheide, Dieter & Young, Steven, 2000. "Constituent lobbying and its impact on the development of financial reporting regulations: evidence from Germany," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 79-98, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:4:y:1995:i:3:p:485-514. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REAR20 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.