IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v32y2023i1p459-469.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

State, Neoliberalism And Financialization

Author

Listed:
  • Ciprian Beniamin BENEA

    (Department of International Business, Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania)

  • Adrian NEGREA

    (Department of International Business, Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania)

Abstract

As liberalism took roots during the 18-th and 19-th centuries, and as United States closed to such an overwhelming position which has made it a political actor with outmost importance at global level especially after the 1-st World War, there was another activity which accompanied this evolution, which is connected to financial activities and their speculative character; one important effect of these actions was the Great Depression in 1929-1939, which threw waves of shocks in America, and all over the world with unforeseen consequences. After the experiences brought upon by the Second World War, doubled by fresh memories of Great Depression, Keynesianism and its system torsed around Bretton Woods negotiations imagined a greater role for the state in relation with the market, especially the international financial market. As this gave birth to what can be seen as the Golden Age of capitalism, it is important to mark the role of state versus market during this period. But as the British Empire was closing to its end, London found a way to reinvent itself, as heir of the dying empire. In order to hold a central position in world affairs, it has looked at money, and the power they could provide: to save its system, London help inventing Eurodollar, circumventing the key-aspects of Bretton Woods and what it stood for. Slowly but surely, the market – especially the financial market – has gained more central position in face of state, and with it, the financialization of the economy. Between 1956 and 1980 there were identifiable clashes in state-market nexus, the most important being triggered by the oil shock in the 70’s; but as world entered the 80’s, it became clear that the market would gain the upper hand. The Reagen-Teacher understanding was the visible point of the picture regarding the shift of importance from state to market. The 90’s will only bring new and fresh markets ready to embrace globalization, sustained by the revolution in communications, which was already in full development. And now we see a minimal state put in a marginal position by the forces of economic globalization and the philosophy of free-market, while the market is seen as a “know and fix everything”; its invisible hand can overcome any temporary disequilibrium. A recurrent question needs to be addressed: where is the state, with its main attributes, in order to protect the people from selfish market forces?

Suggested Citation

  • Ciprian Beniamin BENEA & Adrian NEGREA, 2023. "State, Neoliberalism And Financialization," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 32(1), pages 459-469, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:32:y:2023:i:1:p:459-469
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/en/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/AUOES.July_.202334.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gary Burn, 2006. "The Re-Emergence of Global Finance," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-50159-1.
    2. Michael Moran, 1991. "The Politics of the Financial Services Revolution," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-37789-9.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Niall Majury, 2007. "Technology and the Architecture of Markets: Reconfiguring the Canadian Equity Market," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(9), pages 2187-2206, September.
    2. Underhill, Geoffrey, 2010. "Theory and the Market after the Crisis: the Endogeneity of Financial Governance," CEPR Discussion Papers 8164, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    3. Or Raviv, 2017. "Europe's Mea Culpa: A Global Economy Gone Mad or a Crisis of Our Own Making?," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(2), pages 159-169, May.
    4. Holger Vieten, 1995. "Auditing in Britain and Germany compared: professions, knowledge and the state," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 485-514.
    5. R Grant, 1993. "Trading Blocs or Trading Blows? The Macroeconomic Geography of US and Japanese Trade Policies," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 25(2), pages 273-291, February.
    6. Andrew Sobel, 1997. "Domestic policy choices, political institutional change, and financial globalization-super-1," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 345-377, July.
    7. Harvey, Rachel, 2013. "The legal construction of the global foreign exchange market," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 343-354.
    8. Anston Rambarran, 2001. "The Scope for Inflation Targeting in a Developing Economy: Feasibility, Implications and Design Issues for Trinidad & Tobago," Money Affairs, CEMLA, vol. 0(1), pages 25-49, January-J.
    9. Leon Wansleben, 2021. "Divisions of regulatory labor, institutional closure, and structural secrecy in new regulatory states: The case of neglected liquidity risks in market‐based banking," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 909-932, July.
    10. J Neill Marshall, 2004. "Financial Institutions in Disadvantaged Areas: A Comparative Analysis of Policies Encouraging Financial Inclusion in Britain and the United States," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(2), pages 241-261, February.
    11. Emiliano Grossman, 2006. "Europeanization as an Interactive Process: German Public Banks Meet EU State Aid Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 325-348, June.
    12. Ewald Engelen & Martijn Konings & Rodrigo Fernandez, 2010. "Geographies of Financialization in Disarray: The Dutch Case in Comparative Perspective," Economic Geography, Clark University, vol. 86(1), pages 53-73, January.
    13. Jim Buller & Nicole Lindstrom, 2013. "Hedging its Bets: The UK and the Politics of European Financial Services Regulation," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 391-409, June.
    14. Shiu-Fai Wong, 2005. "Obliging Institutions and Industry Evolution: A Comparative Study of the German and UK Wind Energy Industries," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 117-145.
    15. Joel Bogdanski & Alexandre Antonio Tombini & Sergio R. Da C. Werlang, 2001. "Implementing Inflation Targeting in Brazil," Money Affairs, CEMLA, vol. 0(1), pages 1-23, January-J.
    16. Christine Trampusch & Florian Fastenrath, 2021. "States' interests as limits to the power of finance: Regulatory reforms in early local government financialization in the US and UK," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(2), pages 245-261, April.
    17. Halliday, Terence C. & Carruthers, Bruce G., 1996. "The moral regulation of markets: Professions, privatization and the english insolvency act 1986," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 371-413, May.
    18. Hernán Rincón Castro, 2001. "Exchange Rates and Trade Balance: Testing the Short-and-Long-Run Relationship Using Data for Latin American Countries," Money Affairs, CEMLA, vol. 0(1), pages 51-103, January-J.
    19. Michael Moran, 2010. "The political economy of regulation: Does it have any lessons for accounting research?," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 215-225.
    20. Walter, Timo & Wansleben, Leon, 2018. "How Central Bankers Learned to Love Financialization: The Fed, the Bank, and the Enlisting of Unfettered Markets in the Conduct of Monetary Policy," OSF Preprints gzyp6, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    financialization; market; neo-liberalism; state;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E12 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General Aggregative Models - - - Keynes; Keynesian; Post-Keynesian; Modern Monetary Theory
    • G15 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - International Financial Markets
    • N20 - Economic History - - Financial Markets and Institutions - - - General, International, or Comparative

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:32:y:2023:i:1:p:459-469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.