IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/emetrv/v30y2011i1p109-127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relation of Different Concepts of Causality Used in Time Series and Microeconometrics

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Lechner

Abstract

Granger and Sims noncausality (GSNC), a concept frequently applied in time series econometrics, is compared to noncausality based on concepts popular in microeconometrics, program evaluation, and epidemiology literature (potential outcome noncausality or PONC). GSNC is defined as a set of restrictions on joint distributions of random variables with observable sample counterparts, whereas PONC combines restrictions on partially unobservable variables (potential outcomes) with different identifying assumptions that relate potential outcome variables to their observable counterparts. Based on the Robins' dynamic model of potential outcomes, we find that in general neither of the concepts implies each other without further (untestable) assumptions. However, the identifying assumptions associated with the sequential selection of the observables link these concepts such that GSNC implies PONC, and vice versa.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Lechner, 2011. "The Relation of Different Concepts of Causality Used in Time Series and Microeconometrics," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 109-127.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:emetrv:v:30:y:2011:i:1:p:109-127
    DOI: 10.1080/07474938.2011.520571
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07474938.2011.520571
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hervé Cardot & Antonio Musolesi, 2017. "Modeling temporal treatment effects with zero inflated semi-parametric regression models: the case of local development policies in France," SEEDS Working Papers 0317, SEEDS, Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies, revised Aug 2017.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:emetrv:v:30:y:2011:i:1:p:109-127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/LECR20 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.