IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/edecon/v7y1999i2p121-130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Demand and Supply of Educational Serice: a case of liberal arts colleges

Author

Listed:
  • Rajindar Koshal
  • Manjulika Koshal

Abstract

This study attempts to build and estimate a model that explains the behavior of the supply of and demand for education at liberal arts colleges in the United States. The statistical analysis based on 1990-1991 data for 338 private liberal arts institutions suggests that a perfectly competitive market exists for liberal arts education. The quantity of students, cost of education, average Standardized Aptitude Test score, class size, and ranking of the institutions explain variation in tuition at the liberal arts colleges.

Suggested Citation

  • Rajindar Koshal & Manjulika Koshal, 1999. "Demand and Supply of Educational Serice: a case of liberal arts colleges," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 121-130.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:edecon:v:7:y:1999:i:2:p:121-130
    DOI: 10.1080/09645299900000011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09645299900000011
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09645299900000011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Winship C. Fuller & Charles F. Manski & David A. Wise, 1982. "New Evidence on the Economic Determinants of Postsecondary Schooling Choices," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 17(4), pages 477-498.
    2. R. Koshal & L. Gallaway & R. Akkihal, 1976. "Determinants of male and female higher education in the United States," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 111-121, June.
    3. Amy B. Schmidt, 1992. "Private School Enrollment in Metropolitan Areas," Public Finance Review, , vol. 20(3), pages 298-320, July.
    4. Harford, Jon D. & Marcus, Richard D., 1986. "Tuition and U.S. private college characteristics: The hedonic approach," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 415-430, August.
    5. Clotfelter, Charles T. & Ehrenberg, Ronald G. & Getz, Malcolm & Siegfried, John J., 1992. "Economic Challenges in Higher Education," National Bureau of Economic Research Books, University of Chicago Press, edition 1, number 9780226110509, April.
    6. Hoenack, Stephen A. & Pierro, Daniel J., 1990. "An econometric model of a public university's income and enrollments," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 403-423, December.
    7. Rosen, Sherwin, 1974. "Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 82(1), pages 34-55, Jan.-Feb..
    8. Charles T. Clotfelter & Ronald G. Ehrenberg & Malcolm Getz & John J. Siegfried, 1991. "Introduction to "Economic Challenges in Higher Education"," NBER Chapters, in: Economic Challenges in Higher Education, pages 1-16, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elizabeth Becker & Cotton M. Lindsay & Gary Grizzle, 2003. "The derived demand for faculty research," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(8), pages 549-567.
    2. Robert Jantzen, 2000. "Price and quality effects on the demand for U.S. graduate business programs," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 6(4), pages 730-740, November.
    3. Koshal, Rajindar K. & Koshal, Manjulika, 1999. "Economies of scale and scope in higher education: a case of comprehensive universities," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 269-277, April.
    4. Celia Bilbao-Terol & Verónica Cañal-Fernández, 2013. "The price of secondary school quality: a hedonic approach," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(7), pages 706-709, May.
    5. Robert E. Martin & R. Carter Hill & Melissa S. Waters, 2017. "Baumol and Bowen Cost Effects in Research Universities," Departmental Working Papers 2017-03, Department of Economics, Louisiana State University.
    6. JERE BEHRMAN & LORI KLETZER & MICHAEL McPHERSON & MORTON OWEN SCHAPIRO, 1998. "Microeconomics of College Choice, Careers, and Wages," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 559(1), pages 12-23, September.
    7. Clotfelter, C. T., 2003. "Alumni giving to elite private colleges and universities," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 109-120, April.
    8. Caroline Elliott & Kwok Tong Soo, 2012. "The International Market for MBA Qualifications," Working Papers 24284581, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
    9. Havranek, Tomas & Irsova, Zuzana & Zeynalova, Olesia, 2017. "Tuition Reduces Enrollment Less Than Commonly Thought," MPRA Paper 78813, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Frank A. Scott & Jeffrey D. Anstine, 1997. "Market Structure in the Production of Economics Ph.D.'s," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(1), pages 307-320, July.
    11. Charles T. Clotfelter & Michael Rothschild, 1993. "Introduction to "Studies of Supply and Demand in Higher Education"," NBER Chapters, in: Studies of Supply and Demand in Higher Education, pages 1-10, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Ronald G. Ehrenberg & Panagiotis G. Mavros, 1995. "Do Doctoral Students' Financial Support Patterns Affect Their Times-To-Degree and Completion Probabilities?," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 30(3), pages 581-609.
    13. Woo, Cheonsik, 2002. "Upgrading Higher Education in Korea: Context and Policy Responses," KDI Policy Studies 2002-02, Korea Development Institute (KDI).
    14. Lowry, Robert C., 2001. "The effects of state political interests and campus outputs on public university revenues," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 105-119, April.
    15. Getz, Malcolm & Siegfried, John J. & Anderson, Kathryn H., 1997. "Adoption of innovations in higher education," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 605-631.
    16. Egon Franck & Christian Opitz, 2001. "Zur Funktion von Studiengebühren angesichts von Informationsasymmetrien auf Humankapitalmärkten," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 91-106, March.
    17. Rand Ressler, 2000. "Is offering a degree in law an effective strategy for increasing state educational appropriations?," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(11), pages 749-753.
    18. Bilbao-Terol, Amelia & Álvarez-Otero, Susana & Bilbao-Terol, Celia & Cañal-Fernández, Verónica, 2017. "Hedonic evaluation of the SRI label of mutual funds using matching methodology," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 213-227.
    19. Ina Ganguli, 2017. "Saving Soviet Science: The Impact of Grants When Government R&D Funding Disappears," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 9(2), pages 165-201, April.
    20. Elliott, Caroline & Soo, Kwok Tong, 2013. "The international market for MBA qualifications: The relationship between tuition fees and applications," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 162-174.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:edecon:v:7:y:1999:i:2:p:121-130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CEDE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.