IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apfiec/v23y2013i10p847-859.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of the state, ownership structure, and the performance of real estate firms in China

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Huang
  • Agyenim Boateng

Abstract

Prior studies suggest that high levels of state ownership are related to poor performance of listed companies in China. As a result, privatization has become an important tool to revitalize the under-performing state-owned companies. We have therefore witnessed a continuous decline in the state shareholding over the past decade as a result of the ongoing economic reforms. In this article, we examine the role of state ownership in real estate sector to find out whether shrinking state ownership in a strategically important sector like real estate impact on performance. Using 1999--2010 data on all listed real estate firms, this article shows that relatively higher state shareholding is associated with poor performance in the pre-boom years and better performance in the booming years. The analysis also suggests that the positive effect in the booming years is non-linear and high level of state ownership can still lead to inefficiency and relatively poor performance. In addition, other types of shareholding and concentration of shareholding are also examined. Better firm performance is related to either very low or very high levels of legal person shareholdings. The effect of tradable A-shares fraction on company performance is negative and significant. Management share ownership has a positive influence on performance. Finally, the effect of ownership concentration on performance is also positive in general.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Huang & Agyenim Boateng, 2013. "The role of the state, ownership structure, and the performance of real estate firms in China," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(10), pages 847-859, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:apfiec:v:23:y:2013:i:10:p:847-859
    DOI: 10.1080/09603107.2013.770121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09603107.2013.770121
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09603107.2013.770121?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kurt Hess & Abeyratna Gunasekarage & Martin Hovey, 2010. "State‐dominant and non‐state‐dominant ownership concentration and firm performance," International Journal of Managerial Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(4), pages 264-289, September.
    2. Chen, Gongmeng & Firth, Michael & Rui, Oliver, 2006. "Have China's enterprise reforms led to improved efficiency and profitability?," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 82-109, March.
    3. Hongbin Cai & J. Vernon Henderson & Qinghua Zhang, 2013. "China's land market auctions: evidence of corruption?," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 44(3), pages 488-521, September.
    4. Pradeep K. Chhibber & Sumit K. Majumdar, 1997. "Foreign Ownership and Profitability: Property Rights, Strategic Control and Corporate Performance in Indian Industry," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series 64, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
    5. Rafael La Porta & Florencio Lopez‐De‐Silanes & Andrei Shleifer, 1999. "Corporate Ownership Around the World," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 54(2), pages 471-517, April.
    6. Tian, Lihui & Estrin, Saul, 2005. "Retained State Shareholding in Chinese PLCs: Does Government Ownership Reduce Corporate Value?," IZA Discussion Papers 1493, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Lihui Tian, 2001. "Government Shareholding and the Value of China's Modern Firms," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series 395, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
    8. Xu, Xiaonian & Wang, Yan, 1999. "Ownership structure and corporate governance in Chinese stock companies," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 75-98.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mingfeng Tang & Grace Walsh & Daniel Lerner & Markus A. Fitza & Qiaohua Li, 2018. "Green Innovation, Managerial Concern and Firm Performance: An Empirical Study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 39-51, January.
    2. Sylvain Marsat & Yves Mard & Fabien Roux, 2014. "Ownership structure and corporate financial performance: evidence from France [Structure de l’actionnariat et performance financière de l’entreprise : le cas français]," Post-Print hal-02156607, HAL.
    3. LIU, Shu-Bing & KANG, Hsin-Hong & HSUEH, Shun-Jen, 2018. "Does Corporate Social Responsibility Lead To Superior Performance?," Studii Financiare (Financial Studies), Centre of Financial and Monetary Research "Victor Slavescu", vol. 22(3), pages 6-22, September.
    4. Imad Jabbouri & Maryem Naili & Hamza Almustafa & Rachid Jabbouri, 2023. "Does ownership concentration affect banks’ credit risk? Evidence from MENA emerging markets," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(1), pages 119-140, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liao, Jing & Young, Martin, 2012. "The impact of residual government ownership in privatized firms: New evidence from China," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 338-351.
    2. He, Yan & Chiu, Yung-ho & Zhang, Bin, 2015. "The impact of corporate governance on state-owned and non-state-owned firms efficiency in China," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 252-277.
    3. Lihui Tian & Saul Estrin, 2005. "Retained State Shareholding in Chinese PLCs: Does Government Ownership Reduce Corporate Value?," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series wp750, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
    4. Kurt Hess & Abeyratna Gunasekarage & Martin Hovey, 2010. "State‐dominant and non‐state‐dominant ownership concentration and firm performance," International Journal of Managerial Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(4), pages 264-289, September.
    5. Haroon ur Rashid Khan & Waqas Bin Khidmat & Osama Al Hares & Naeem Muhammad & Kashif Saleem, 2020. "Corporate Governance Quality, Ownership Structure, Agency Costs and Firm Performance. Evidence from an Emerging Economy," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-35, July.
    6. Wang, Caiping & Xu, Honggang, 2014. "The role of local government and the private sector in China's tourism industry," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 95-105.
    7. Wei, Gang & Xiao, Jason Zezhong, 2009. "Equity ownership segregation, shareholder preferences, and dividend policy in China," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 169-183.
    8. Huang, Zhangkai & Wang, Kun, 2011. "Ultimate privatization and change in firm performance: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 121-132, March.
    9. Deng, Yongheng & Morck, Randall & Wu, Jing & Yeung, Bernard, 2011. "Monetary and Fiscal Stimuli, Ownership Structure, and China's Housing Market," Ratio Working Papers 173, The Ratio Institute.
    10. Fan, Dennis K.K. & Lau, Chung-Ming & Young, Michael, 2007. "Is China's corporate governance beginning to come of age? The case of CEO turnover," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 105-120, April.
    11. Zhi Wang & Miao Yu, 2022. "Political embeddedness and firms' growth," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(1), pages 127-153, February.
    12. Wiem Elmanaa Madani & Wafa Khlif, 2005. "Effets De La Structure De Propriete Sur La Performance Comptable : Etude Empirique Sur Les Entreprises Tunisiennes Indistruelles Non Cotees," Post-Print halshs-00581192, HAL.
    13. Kun Wang & Zhe Wei & Xing Xiao & Kunpeng Sun, 2020. "Security regulations, access to capital markets, and firm performance: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(7-8), pages 1034-1058, July.
    14. Shiguang Ma & Tony Naughton & Gary Tian, 2010. "Ownership and ownership concentration: which is important in determining the performance of China’s listed firms?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 50(4), pages 871-897, December.
    15. Ahmed Aboud & Ahmed Diab, 2022. "Ownership Characteristics and Financial Performance: Evidence from Chinese Split-Share Structure Reform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, June.
    16. Markin, Erik T. & Skorodziyevskiy, Vitaliy & Zhu, Lina & Chrisman, James J. & Fang, Hanqing “Chevy”, 2022. "Lone-founder firms in China: Replicating Miller et al. (2007) in a different context," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 13(4).
    17. Hamadi, Malika & Heinen, Andréas, 2015. "Firm performance when ownership is very concentrated: Evidence from a semiparametric panel," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 172-194.
    18. Kun Wang & Greg Shailer, 2015. "Ownership Concentration And Firm Performance In Emerging Markets: A Meta-Analysis," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 199-229, April.
    19. Minetti, Raoul & Murro, Pierluigi & Paiella, Monica, 2015. "Ownership structure, governance, and innovation," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 165-193.
    20. Farhad Shahveisi & Farshid Khairollahi & Mohammad Alipour, 2017. "Does ownership structure matter for corporate intellectual capital performance? An empirical test in the Iranian context," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 7(1), pages 67-91, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apfiec:v:23:y:2013:i:10:p:847-859. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAFE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.