IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v72y2018i2p184-190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating Desired Sample Size for Simple Random Sampling of a Skewed Population

Author

Listed:
  • Timothy G. Gregoire
  • David L. R. Affleck

Abstract

A simulation study was conducted to assess how well the necessary sample size to achieve a stipulated margin of error can be estimated prior to sampling. Our concern was particularly focused on performance when sampling from a very skewed distribution, which is a common feature of many biological, economic, and other populations. We examined two approaches for estimating sample size—one being the commonly used strategy aimed at regulating the average magnitude of the stipulated margin of error and the second being a previously proposed strategy to control the tolerance probability with which the stipulated margin of error is exceeded. Results of the simulation revealed that (1) skewness does not much affect the average estimated sample size but can greatly extend the range of estimated sample sizes; and (2) skewness does reduce the effectiveness of Kupper and Hafner's sample size estimator, yet its effectiveness is negatively impacted less by skewness directly, and to a much greater degree by the common practice of estimating the population variance via a pilot sampling from the skewed population. Nonetheless, the simulations suggest that estimating sample size to control the probability with which the desired margin of error is achieved is a worthwhile alternative to the usual sample size formula that controls the average width of the confidence interval only.

Suggested Citation

  • Timothy G. Gregoire & David L. R. Affleck, 2018. "Estimating Desired Sample Size for Simple Random Sampling of a Skewed Population," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(2), pages 184-190, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:72:y:2018:i:2:p:184-190
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2017.1290548
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2017.1290548
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2017.1290548?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tim C. Hesterberg, 2015. "What Teachers Should Know About the Bootstrap: Resampling in the Undergraduate Statistics Curriculum," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(4), pages 371-386, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vendrell-Herrero, Ferran & Bustinza, Oscar F. & Opazo-Basaez, Marco, 2021. "Information technologies and product-service innovation: The moderating role of service R&D team structure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 673-687.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mozhgan Alirezaei Dizicheh & Nasrollah Iranpanah & Ehsan Zamanzade, 2021. "Bootstrap Methods for Judgment Post Stratification," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(5), pages 2453-2471, October.
    2. Andrew D Wilcock & Sushant Joshi & José Escarce & Peter J Huckfeldt & Teryl Nuckols & Ioana Popescu & Neeraj Sood, 2021. "Luck of the draw: Role of chance in the assignment of medicare readmissions penalties," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Casalin, Fabrizio & Dia, Enzo, 2019. "Information and reputation mechanisms in auctions of remanufactured goods," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 185-212.
    4. Hakim, Adam & Klorfeld, Shira & Sela, Tal & Friedman, Doron & Shabat-Simon, Maytal & Levy, Dino J., 2021. "Machines learn neuromarketing: Improving preference prediction from self-reports using multiple EEG measures and machine learning," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 770-791.
    5. Jale Samuwai & Jeremy Maxwell Hills, 2018. "Assessing Climate Finance Readiness in the Asia-Pacific Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Jeffrey D. Michler & Anna Josephson, 2022. "Recent developments in inference: practicalities for applied economics," Chapters, in: A Modern Guide to Food Economics, chapter 11, pages 235-268, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Yulong Xie & Mark Halverson & Rosemarie Bartlett & Yan Chen & Michael Rosenberg & Todd Taylor & Jeremiah Williams & Michael Reiner, 2020. "Evaluating Building Energy Code Compliance and Savings Potential through Large-Scale Simulation with Models Inferred by Field Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, May.
    8. Samanwoy Mukhopadhyay & Pravat K Thatoi & Abhay D Pandey & Bidyut K Das & Balachandran Ravindran & Samsiddhi Bhattacharjee & Saroj K Mohapatra, 2017. "Transcriptomic meta-analysis reveals up-regulation of gene expression functional in osteoclast differentiation in human septic shock," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, February.
    9. Subburaj Alagarsamy & Sangeeta Mehrolia & Sonia Mathew, 2021. "How Green Consumption Value Affects Green Consumer Behaviour: The Mediating Role of Consumer Attitudes Towards Sustainable Food Logistics Practices," Vision, , vol. 25(1), pages 65-76, March.
    10. Au Yong Lyn, Audrey, 2022. "Vocational training and employment outcomes of domestic violence survivors: Evidence from Chihuahua City," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    11. Fırat Bilgel & Burhan Can Karahasan, 2024. "Understanding Covid-19 Mobility Through Human Capital: A Unified Causal Framework," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 63(2), pages 793-833, February.
    12. Benjamin D. Evans & Piotr Słowiński & Andrew T. Hattersley & Samuel E. Jones & Seth Sharp & Robert A. Kimmitt & Michael N. Weedon & Richard A. Oram & Krasimira Tsaneva-Atanasova & Nicholas J. Thomas, 2021. "Estimating disease prevalence in large datasets using genetic risk scores," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:72:y:2018:i:2:p:184-190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.