IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ssi/jouesi/v8y2021i4p29-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Business models of start-ups and their impact on the sustainability of nascent business

Author

Listed:
  • Štefan Slávik

    (University of Economics in Bratislava, Slovakia)

  • Richard Bednár

    (University of Economics in Bratislava, Slovakia)

  • Ivana Mišúnová Hudáková

    (University of Economics in Bratislava, Slovakia)

  • Branislav Zagoršek

    (University of Economics in Bratislava, Slovakia)

Abstract

Start-ups are an attractive business phenomenon because they offer opportunities for personal self-realization and extraordinary business growth. The survival and sustainability of start-ups depends mainly on the quality and development of their business model. However, this assumption must be confirmed by the field research. Field research dealt with the personnel background of the business, the business idea, the structure of the business model, the impact of quality and development degree of business model on start-up performance. Each start-up was individually examined on the basis of a structured questionnaire and a personal interview with the founder. Start-up founders are relatively young and educated, but without relevant business experience. The originality of business ideas is approaching the European level, but the evidence about it is superficial and the degree of protection of ideas is low. The level of quality and development of business model blocks is unbalanced. The most developed block is the customer value proposition/product, the least developed block is the revenue streams. The business model affects the performance of the start-up, but in a small intensity and efficiency only. The examined start-ups are slow in their development and fail to sufficiently monetize the results of their efforts. Research has revealed new and original insights into the structure of the business model of start-ups, the links between the quality of blocks and their stage of development, the impact of the business model on start-up performance or sustainability, and identified some weaknesses of start-ups. Faster development of business model and purposeful selection of partners and effective cooperation with them would probably eliminate at least some of the shortcomings of the start-ups under investigation.

Suggested Citation

  • Štefan Slávik & Richard Bednár & Ivana Mišúnová Hudáková & Branislav Zagoršek, 2021. "Business models of start-ups and their impact on the sustainability of nascent business," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(4), pages 29-52, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:8:y:2021:i:4:p:29-52
    DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2021.8.4(2)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/uploads/articles/32/Slavik_Business_models_of_startups_and_their_impact_on_the_sustainability_of_nascent_business.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/808
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.9770/jesi.2021.8.4(2)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David J. Teece & Greg Linden, 2017. "Business models, value capture, and the digital enterprise," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Stefan Groesser & Niklas Jovy, 2016. "Business model analysis using computational modeling: a strategy tool for exploration and decision-making," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 61-88, February.
    3. Wooseung Lee & Boyoung Kim, 2019. "Business Sustainability of Start-Ups Based on Government Support: An Empirical Study of Korean Start-Ups," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Martin Bliemel & Ricardo Flores & Saskia De Klerk & Morgan P. Miles, 2019. "Accelerators as start-up infrastructure for entrepreneurial clusters," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1-2), pages 133-149, January.
    5. Joern Block & Karsten Kohn & Danny Miller & Katrin Ullrich, 2015. "Necessity entrepreneurship and competitive strategy," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 37-54, January.
    6. Cosmina Lelia Voinea & Marcel Logger & Fawad Rauf & Nadine Roijakkers, 2019. "Drivers for Sustainable Business Models in Start-Ups: Multiple Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-25, December.
    7. Michael Fritsch & Michael Wyrwich, 2018. "Regional knowledge, entrepreneurial culture, and innovative start-ups over time and space―an empirical investigation," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 337-353, August.
    8. Stefan N. Groesser & Niklas Jovy, 2016. "Business model analysis using computational modeling: a strategy tool for exploration and decision-making," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 61-88, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Štefan Slávik, 2019. "The Business Model of Start-Up—Structure and Consequences," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Thomas Moellers & Lars von der Burg & Bastian Bansemir & Max Pretzl & Oliver Gassmann, 2019. "System dynamics for corporate business model innovation," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(3), pages 387-406, September.
    3. Aima Khan & Muhammad Azeem Qureshi & Pål Ingebrigt Davidsen, 2020. "How do oil prices and investments impact the dynamics of firm value?," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 36(1), pages 74-100, January.
    4. Emanuel Wittberg & Gissur Ó. Erlingsson & Karl Wennberg, 2024. "Does local government corruption inhibit entrepreneurship?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 775-806, February.
    5. Enzo Bivona & Federico Cosenz, 2021. "Designing a Multi‐Sided Platform business model assessment framework: a Dynamic Performance Management perspective," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 93-107, January.
    6. Enzo Bivona, 2021. "Il dynamic business modelling per lo sviluppo e la prevenzione delle crisi delle piattaforme multi-sided," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2021(suppl. 2), pages 91-113.
    7. Federico Cosenz & Vinicius Picanço Rodrigues & Francesco Rosati, 2020. "Dynamic business modeling for sustainability: Exploring a system dynamics perspective to develop sustainable business models," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 651-664, February.
    8. Saleh Alkhodhair & Ahmed Alsanad & Khaled Alghathbar & Abdu Gumaei, 2020. "Key Quality Attributes for Computational and Sustainable Higher Education Strategy Implementation in Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-23, March.
    9. Ossi Pesämaa, 2017. "Personnel- and action control in gazelle companies in Sweden," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 107-132, February.
    10. Balaussa Azubayeva, 2021. "The Impact of Cultural Capital on Development of Entrepreneurship in Wales," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, December.
    11. Cosenz, Federico & Bivona, Enzo, 2021. "Fostering growth patterns of SMEs through business model innovation. A tailored dynamic business modelling approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 658-669.
    12. Renaud Bourlès & Anastasia Cozarenco, 2018. "Entrepreneurial motivation and business performance: evidence from a French Microfinance Institution," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 943-963, December.
    13. Rhiannon Pugh & Danny Soetanto & Sarah L. Jack & Eleanor Hamilton, 2021. "Developing local entrepreneurial ecosystems through integrated learning initiatives: the Lancaster case," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 833-847, February.
    14. Estrin, Saul & Guerrero, Maribel & Mickiewicz, Tomasz, 2024. "A framework for investigating new firm entry: The (limited) overlap between informal-formal and necessity-opportunity entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 39(4).
    15. Deping Xiong & Nada Khaddage-Soboh & Muhammad Umar & Adnan Safi & Diego Norena-Chavez, 2024. "Redefining entrepreneurship in the digital age: exploring the impact of technology and collaboration on ventures," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 3255-3281, December.
    16. Tim Gruchmann & Nadine Pratt & Jan Eiten & Ani Melkonyan, 2020. "4PL Digital Business Models in Sea Freight Logistics: The Case of FreightHub," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-14, May.
    17. Peter Zwan & Roy Thurik & Ingrid Verheul & Jolanda Hessels, 2016. "Factors influencing the entrepreneurial engagement of opportunity and necessity entrepreneurs," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 6(3), pages 273-295, December.
    18. Victor Otieno & Stephen Muathe, 2023. "A Reflection Approach on Business Incubation Services: Accelerating Startup Businesses in Kenya," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(5), pages 1375-1400, May.
    19. Hock-Doepgen, Marianne & Clauss, Thomas & Kraus, Sascha & Cheng, Cheng-Feng, 2021. "Knowledge management capabilities and organizational risk-taking for business model innovation in SMEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 683-697.
    20. Broccardo, Laura & Vola, Paola & Zicari, Adrian & Alshibani, Safiya Mukhtar, 2023. "Contingency-based analysis of the drivers and obstacles to a successful sustainable business model: Seeking the uncaptured value," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    start-up; business idea; business model; canvas; business performance; sustainability of business;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • G24 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Investment Banking; Venture Capital; Brokerage

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:8:y:2021:i:4:p:29-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manuela Tvaronaviciene (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.