IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/wirtsc/v100y2020i9d10.1007_s10273-020-2737-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Zum Verhältnis von Zinssatz und Wachstumsrate: Theorie und empirische Evidenz
[On the Relationship Between Interest Rates and Economic Growth: Theory and Empirical Evidence]

Author

Listed:
  • Carl Christian von Weizsäcker

    (MPI zur Erforschung von Gemeinschaftsgütern)

  • Hagen Krämer

    (Hochschule Karlsruhe — Technik und Wirtschaft)

Abstract

Zussamenfassung Wir setzen uns in diesem Beitrag mit einigen kritischen Kommentaren von Hans-Werner Sinn, Peter Bofinger und Eckhard Hein auseinander, die diese zu unserem Buch „Sparen und Investieren im 21. Jahrhundert — Die große Divergenz“ im Augustheft 2020 des Wirtschaftsdienst abgegeben haben. Wir befassen uns insbesondere mit dem umstrittenen Phänomen der dynamischen Ineffizienz, mit der Kritik an unserem Konzept der impliziten Staatsverschuldung, mit der Interpretation von ökonomischen Weltbildern sowie dem Vorwurf, monetäre Aspekte in unserer Theorie vernachlässigt zu haben.

Suggested Citation

  • Carl Christian von Weizsäcker & Hagen Krämer, 2020. "Zum Verhältnis von Zinssatz und Wachstumsrate: Theorie und empirische Evidenz [On the Relationship Between Interest Rates and Economic Growth: Theory and Empirical Evidence]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 100(9), pages 674-681, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:wirtsc:v:100:y:2020:i:9:d:10.1007_s10273-020-2737-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10273-020-2737-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10273-020-2737-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10273-020-2737-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hans-Werner Sinn, 2020. "Staatsverschuldung und dynamische Ineffizienz: Warum der Münchhausen-Trick nicht funktioniert," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 100(8), pages 572-576, August.
    2. Eckhard Hein, 2020. "Sparen und Investieren im 21. Jahrhundert — die post-keynesianische Perspektive," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 100(8), pages 582-585, August.
    3. Peter Bofinger, 2020. "Sparen und Investieren im Spannungsfeld widerstreitender Paradigmen," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 100(8), pages 577-581, August.
    4. Richard J. Arnott & Joseph E. Stiglitz, 1979. "Aggregate Land Rents, Expenditure on Public Goods, and Optimal City Size," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 93(4), pages 471-500.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haoxuan Zou, 2020. "Does Political Connection in China Influence Urban Land Supply?," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 10(3), pages 1-8.
    2. Christian A. L. Hilber, 2017. "The Economic Implications of House Price Capitalization: A Synthesis," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 45(2), pages 301-339, April.
    3. Albouy, David & Behrens, Kristian & Robert-Nicoud, Frédéric & Seegert, Nathan, 2019. "The optimal distribution of population across cities," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 102-113.
    4. Duranton, Gilles & Puga, Diego, 2014. "The Growth of Cities," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 5, pages 781-853, Elsevier.
    5. Joseph E. Stiglitz, 2015. "In Praise of Frank Ramsey's Contribution to the Theory of Taxation," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 0(583), pages 235-268, March.
    6. Christian A. L. Hilber, 2019. "Immobilienpreise und Immobilienzyklen und die Rolle von Angebotsbeschränkungen [The impact of local supply constraints on house prices and price dynamics]," Zeitschrift für Immobilienökonomie (German Journal of Real Estate Research), Springer;Gesellschaft für Immobilienwirtschaftliche Forschung e. V., vol. 5(1), pages 37-65, November.
    7. Bonnet, Odran & Chapelle, Guillaume & Trannoy, Alain & Wasmer, Etienne, 2021. "Land is back, it should be taxed, it can be taxed," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    8. Odran Bonnet & Guillaume Flamerie de La Chapelle & Alain Trannoy & Etienne Wasmer, 2019. "Secular Trends in Wealth and Heterogeneous Capital: Land is Back... and Should Be Taxed," Working Papers hal-03570837, HAL.
    9. Fuss, Sabine & Chen, Claudine & Jakob, Michael & Marxen, Annika & Rao, Narasimha D. & Edenhofer, Ottmar, 2016. "Could resource rents finance universal access to infrastructure? A first exploration of needs and rents," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(6), pages 691-712, December.
    10. Kunce, Mitch, 2000. "A Nash tax game extending the generality of the Henry George Theorem," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 229-233, February.
    11. Roberto Brunetti & Carl Gaigné & Fabien Moizeau, 2023. "Credit Market Imperfections, Urban Land Rents and the Henry George Theorem," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 74(5), pages 681-703.
    12. Stiglitz, Joseph E., 2018. "Pareto efficient taxation and expenditures: Pre- and re-distribution," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 101-119.
    13. Schweizer, Urs, 1996. "Endogenous fertility and the Henry George Theorem," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 209-228, August.
    14. Gaigné, Carl & Riou, Stéphane & Thisse, Jacques-François, 2016. "How to make the metropolitan area work? Neither big government, nor laissez-faire," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 100-113.
    15. World Bank, 2003. "Brazil : Inequality and Economic Development, Volume 2. Background Papers," World Bank Publications - Reports 14696, The World Bank Group.
    16. Martin Hellwig, 2021. "Der Zinssatz ist kein Preis [The Interest Rate Should not be Interpreted as a Price]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 101(11), pages 862-869, November.
    17. Huberto M. Ennis & Santiago M. Pinto & Alberto Porto, 2006. "Choosing a place to live and a workplace," Económica, Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, vol. 0(1-2), pages 15-51, January-D.
    18. Papageorgiou, Yorgos Y. & Pines, David, 2000. "Externalities, Indivisibility, Nonreplicability, and Agglomeration," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 509-535, November.
    19. Alan Collins, 2007. "Making Truly Competitive Cities – On The Appropriate Role For Local Government," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 75-80, September.
    20. Been, Vicki & Ellen, Ingrid Gould & Gedal, Michael & Glaeser, Edward & McCabe, Brian J., 2016. "Preserving history or restricting development? The heterogeneous effects of historic districts on local housing markets in New York City," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 16-30.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • E01 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General - - - Measurement and Data on National Income and Product Accounts and Wealth; Environmental Accounts
    • E22 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Investment; Capital; Intangible Capital; Capacity
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:wirtsc:v:100:y:2020:i:9:d:10.1007_s10273-020-2737-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.