IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v39y2025i2d10.1007_s11269-024-03994-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Conceptual Decision-Making Framework for River Ecological Flow Based on a Dynamic Balance Between the Supply and Demand of Stakeholders

Author

Listed:
  • Lei Liu

    (State Key Laboratory of Eco-hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region of China (Xi’an University of Technology)
    CCTEG Xi’an Research Institute(Group)Co., Ltd)

  • Xingqi Luo

    (State Key Laboratory of Eco-hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region of China (Xi’an University of Technology))

  • Bo Cheng

    (State Key Laboratory of Eco-hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region of China (Xi’an University of Technology))

  • Huaien Li

    (State Key Laboratory of Eco-hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region of China (Xi’an University of Technology))

  • Wenjuan Cheng

    (State Key Laboratory of Eco-hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region of China (Xi’an University of Technology))

  • Xijun Wu

    (State Key Laboratory of Eco-hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region of China (Xi’an University of Technology))

Abstract

Improving the protection level of river ecological flow (e-flow) can disrupt the balance of interests among various stakeholders in a region, potentially slowing down the protection process. To mitigate these negative impacts, we introduce a conceptual decision-making framework for modeling river e-flow, based on a dynamic equilibrium between the supply and demand of stakeholders. In this model, the willingness to pay for river e-flow protection is defined as the compensation supply from beneficiaries, while agricultural economic losses represent the compensation demand from affected parties. Illustrated with the Linjiacun section of the Baoji segment of the Weihe River (BSWHR), the main conclusions are as follows: (1) A conceptual decision-making framework for modeling the river e-flow is proposed, and deemed reasonable and feasible through rational analysis; (2) The e-flow of rivers in a typical dry year was 6.64 m3/s, and it increased with the increasing runoff; (3) The impact of changes in living standards and runoff on the e-flow in rivers was revealed, leading to the proposal of two policies for e-flow management; (4) This paper qualitatively analyzed the contrasts and relationships between the newly proposed model and mainstream methods (detailed in introduction), discussing the advantages, applicability, and prospect of this decision-making model. This model can provide an important theoretical and technical basis for the optimal management of water resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Lei Liu & Xingqi Luo & Bo Cheng & Huaien Li & Wenjuan Cheng & Xijun Wu, 2025. "A Conceptual Decision-Making Framework for River Ecological Flow Based on a Dynamic Balance Between the Supply and Demand of Stakeholders," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 39(2), pages 865-881, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:39:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11269-024-03994-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-024-03994-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-024-03994-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-024-03994-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qureshi, Muhammad Ejaz & Connor, Jeffery D. & Kirby, Mac & Mainuddin, Mohammed, 2007. "Economic assessment of acquiring water for environmental flows in the Murray Basin," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 51(3), pages 1-21.
    2. Gopal, Brij, 2016. "A conceptual framework for environmental flows assessment based on ecosystem services and their economic valuation," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(PA), pages 53-58.
    3. Bo Cheng & Huaien Li & Siyu Yue, 2020. "Quantity of Reasonable Distribution of River Ecological Basic Flow Considering the Economic Value of its Own Ecological Functions: a Case Study in the Baoji Section of the Weihe River, China," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(3), pages 1111-1122, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bo Cheng & Huaien Li & Siyu Yue, 2020. "Quantity of Reasonable Distribution of River Ecological Basic Flow Considering the Economic Value of its Own Ecological Functions: a Case Study in the Baoji Section of the Weihe River, China," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(3), pages 1111-1122, February.
    2. repec:bla:canjag:v:58:y:2010:i:s1:p:403-409 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Marshall, Elizabeth P. & Weinberg, Marca, 2012. "Baselines in Environmental Markets: Tradeoffs Between Cost and Additionality," Economic Brief 138922, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Ancev, Tiho, 2015. "The role of the commonwealth environmental water holder in annual water allocation markets," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 59(01), January.
    5. Neville D Crossman & Jeffrey D Connor & Brett A Bryan & David A Summers & John Ginnivan, 2009. "Reconfiguring an Irrigation Landscape to Improve Provision of Ecosystem Services," Socio-Economics and the Environment in Discussion (SEED) Working Paper Series 2009-07, CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems.
    6. Zheng Zang, 2021. "Conceptual Model of Ecosystem Service Flows from Carbon Dioxide to Blue Carbon in Coastal Wetlands: An Empirical Study Based on Yancheng, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-12, April.
    7. Gohar, Abdelaziz A. & Ward, Frank A., 2010. "Gains from expanded irrigation water trading in Egypt: An integrated basin approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 2535-2548, October.
    8. Agbola, Frank W. & Evans, Nigel, 2012. "Modelling rice and cotton acreage response in the Murray Darling Basin in Australia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 74-82.
    9. repec:ags:ubzefd:148054 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Grafton, Rupert & Jiang, Qiang, 2011. "Economic effects of water recovery on irrigated agriculture in the Murray-Darling Basin," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 55(4), pages 1-13.
    11. Simon de Bonviller & Alec Zuo & Sarah Ann Wheeler, 2019. "Is there evidence of insider trading in Australian water markets?," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(2), pages 307-327, April.
    12. Asad Falsafi Zadeh, Neda & Sabouhi Sabouni, Mahmood, 2009. "Determination of Optimal Environmental Flow Acquisition in Kor Basin, Doroudzan Dam," 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China 50258, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Muhammad Ejaz Qureshi & Ram Ranjan & Sumaira Ejaz Qureshi, 2010. "An empirical assessment of the value of irrigation water: the case study of Murrumbidgee catchment ," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 54(1), pages 99-118, January.
    14. M. E. Qureshi & M. D. Ahmad & S. M. Whitten & A. Reeson & M. Kirby, 2018. "Impact of Climate Variability Including Drought on the Residual Value of Irrigation Water Across the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(01), pages 1-25, January.
    15. Connor, Jeff & Schwabe, Kurt & King, Darran & Kaczan, David & Kirby, Mac, 2009. "Impacts of climate change on lower Murray irrigation," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 53(3), pages 1-20.
    16. Pérez-Blanco, C. Dionisio & Sapino, Francesco & Saiz-Santiago, Pablo, 2023. "First-degree price discrimination water bank to reduce reacquisition costs and enhance economic efficiency in agricultural water buyback," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    17. Bekchanov, Maksud & Bhaduri, Anik & Ringler, Claudia, 2013. "How market-based water allocation can improve water use efficiency in the Aral Sea basin?," Discussion Papers 155504, University of Bonn, Center for Development Research (ZEF).
    18. Pereau, Jean-Christophe & Pryet, Alexandre & Rambonilaza, Tina, 2019. "Optimality Versus Viability in Groundwater Management with Environmental Flows," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 109-120.
    19. Sarah Wheeler & Dustin Garrick & Adam Loch & Henning Bjornlund, 2011. "Incorporating Temporary Trade with the Buy-Back of Water Entitlements inAustralia," Centre for Water Economics, Environment and Policy Papers 1101, Centre for Water Economics, Environment and Policy, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    20. Mushtaq, Shahbaz & Cockfield, Geoff & White, Neil & Jakeman, Guy, 2014. "Modelling interactions between farm-level structural adjustment and a regional economy: A case of the Australian rice industry," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 34-42.
    21. M Ejaz Qureshi & Tian Shi & Sumaira Qureshi & Wendy Proctor & Mac Kirby, 2009. "Removing Barriers to Facilitate Efficient Water Markets in the Murray Darling Basin – A Case Study from Australia," Socio-Economics and the Environment in Discussion (SEED) Working Paper Series 2009-02, CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems.
    22. Bo Cheng & Huaien Li, 2023. "Determination of River Ecological Base Flow Based on the Coupling Relationship of Sediment–Water Quality–Biodiversity in Water Shortage Area of Northwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-17, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:39:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11269-024-03994-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.