IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v37y2023i8d10.1007_s11269-023-03456-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Equity, Social Welfare, and Economic Benefit Efficiency in the Optimal Allocation of Coastal Groundwater Resources

Author

Listed:
  • Elmira Valipour

    (Tarbiat Modares University)

  • Hamed Ketabchi

    (Tarbiat Modares University)

  • Reza Safari shali

    (Kharazmi University)

  • Saeed Morid

    (Tarbiat Modares University)

Abstract

There is increasing concern about groundwater scarcity, environmental problems, and its socio-economic consequences. Therefore, questions have been raised about new approaches to allocating groundwater resources. This study aims to shed new light on these debates through a modeling effort to be applied to coastal groundwater management (CGM). The purpose of this study is to develop an approach for modeling coastal groundwater allocation based on equity, social welfare, and economic benefit efficiency principles. In this approach, the Gini coefficient and a modified Bentham-Rawls Criterion have been applied to increase water allocation equity in water-using sectors and subareas. Moreover, both economic development and water management have been taken into account to improve economic benefit efficiency. Four benchmark CGM problems with different degrees of difficulty have been selected to examine a variety of objective functions and constraints in this approach. The results demonstrate that this approach can be applied to assess various situations in real-case and large-scale problems. Economic efficiency loss levels have a significant influence on agricultural and industrial water allocation equity and the maximum economic efficiency loss rate. In the agricultural and industrial sectors, a greater loss tolerance threshold means less economic benefit and more equal groundwater allocation. To improve groundwater allocation efficiency, some socio-economic requirements should be considered in CGM. The results indicate that water authorities need to strike a balance between equity and economic benefit in groundwater allocation to adapt to groundwater allocation problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Elmira Valipour & Hamed Ketabchi & Reza Safari shali & Saeed Morid, 2023. "Equity, Social Welfare, and Economic Benefit Efficiency in the Optimal Allocation of Coastal Groundwater Resources," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(8), pages 2969-2990, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:37:y:2023:i:8:d:10.1007_s11269-023-03456-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-023-03456-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-023-03456-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-023-03456-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alvarez-Cuadrado, Francisco & Van Long, Ngo, 2009. "A mixed Bentham-Rawls criterion for intergenerational equity: Theory and implications," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 154-168, September.
    2. Jing Tian & Shenglian Guo & Dedi Liu & Zhengke Pan & Xingjun Hong, 2019. "A Fair Approach for Multi-Objective Water Resources Allocation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(10), pages 3633-3653, August.
    3. Dimitrios Karpouzos & Konstantinos Katsifarakis, 2013. "A Set of New Benchmark Optimization Problems for Water Resources Management," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(9), pages 3333-3348, July.
    4. Shuangsheng Zhang & Jing Qiang & Hanhu Liu & Xiaonan Wang & Junjie Zhou & Dongliang Fan, 2022. "An Adaptive Dynamic Kriging Surrogate Model for Application to the Optimal Remediation of Contaminated Groundwater," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(13), pages 5011-5032, October.
    5. Long, Xianling & Ji, Xi, 2019. "Economic Growth Quality, Environmental Sustainability, and Social Welfare in China - Provincial Assessment Based on Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 157-176.
    6. Dai, Z.Y. & Li, Y.P., 2013. "A multistage irrigation water allocation model for agricultural land-use planning under uncertainty," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 69-79.
    7. Dedi Liu & Xiaohong Chen & Zhanghua Lou, 2010. "A Model for the Optimal Allocation of Water Resources in a Saltwater Intrusion Area: A Case Study in Pearl River Delta in China," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 24(1), pages 63-81, January.
    8. Cullis, J. & van Koppen, Barbara, 2007. "Applying the Gini Coefficient to measure inequality of water use in the Olifants River water management area, South Africa," IWMI Research Reports H040313, International Water Management Institute.
    9. Graciela Chichilnisky, 1996. "An axiomatic approach to sustainable development," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 13(2), pages 231-257, April.
    10. M. Babel & A. Gupta & D. Nayak, 2005. "A Model for Optimal Allocation of Water to Competing Demands," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 19(6), pages 693-712, December.
    11. N. Gunasekara & S. Kazama & D. Yamazaki & T. Oki, 2014. "Water Conflict Risk due to Water Resource Availability and Unequal Distribution," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(1), pages 169-184, January.
    12. Gabriel, Cle-Anne & Bond, Carol, 2019. "Need, Entitlement and Desert: A Distributive Justice Framework for Consumption Degrowth," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 327-336.
    13. George Kourakos & Aristotelis Mantoglou, 2011. "Simulation and Multi-Objective Management of Coastal Aquifers in Semi-Arid Regions," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 25(4), pages 1063-1074, March.
    14. Behzad Ataie-Ashtiani & Hamed Ketabchi, 2011. "Elitist Continuous Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm for Optimal Management of Coastal Aquifers," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 25(1), pages 165-190, January.
    15. Wegmann, Johannes & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2019. "Groundwater management institutions in the face of rapid urbanization – Results of a framed field experiment in Bengaluru, India," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amir Hatamkhani & Ali Moridi, 2021. "Optimal Development of Agricultural Sectors in the Basin Based on Economic Efficiency and Social Equality," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(3), pages 917-932, February.
    2. Hu, Zhineng & Chen, Yazhen & Yao, Liming & Wei, Changting & Li, Chaozhi, 2016. "Optimal allocation of regional water resources: From a perspective of equity–efficiency tradeoff," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 102-113.
    3. Cairns, Robert D. & Del Campo, Stellio & Martinet, Vincent, 2019. "Sustainability of an economy relying on two reproducible assets," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 145-160.
    4. Charles Figuières & Mabel Tidball, 2016. "Sustainable Exploitation of a Natural Resource: A Satisfying Use of Chichilnisky’s Criterion," Studies in Economic Theory, in: Graciela Chichilnisky & Armon Rezai (ed.), The Economics of the Global Environment, pages 207-229, Springer.
    5. W. J. Wouter Botzen & Jeroen C. J. M. Van Den Bergh & Graciela Chichilnisky, 2018. "Climate Policy Without Intertemporal Dictatorship: Chichilnisky Criterion Versus Classical Utilitarianism In Dice," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(02), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Ngo Long & Vincent Martinet, 2018. "Combining rights and welfarism: a new approach to intertemporal evaluation of social alternatives," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 50(1), pages 35-64, January.
    7. Chunlong Li & Jianzhong Zhou & Shuo Ouyang & Chao Wang & Yi Liu, 2015. "Water Resources Optimal Allocation Based on Large-scale Reservoirs in the Upper Reaches of Yangtze River," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(7), pages 2171-2187, May.
    8. Luc Lauwers, 2016. "Intergenerational Equity, Efficiency, and Constructibility," Studies in Economic Theory, in: Graciela Chichilnisky & Armon Rezai (ed.), The Economics of the Global Environment, pages 191-206, Springer.
    9. Darrel Moellendorf & Axel Schaffer, 2017. "An intergenerationally fair path towards 2 °C," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 143(1), pages 213-226, July.
    10. Ijaz Ahmad & Fan Zhang, 2022. "Optimal Agricultural Water Allocation for the Sustainable Development of Surface and Groundwater Resources," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(11), pages 4219-4236, September.
    11. Martinet, Vincent & Del Campo, Stellio & Cairns, Robert D., 2022. "Intragenerational inequality aversion and intergenerational equity," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue forthcomi.
    12. Geir B. Asheim, 2014. "Equitable intergenerational preferences and sustainability," Chapters, in: Giles Atkinson & Simon Dietz & Eric Neumayer & Matthew Agarwala (ed.), Handbook of Sustainable Development, chapter 8, pages 125-139, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Ha-Huy, Thai, 2022. "A tale of two Rawlsian criteria," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 30-35.
    14. Tol, Richard S.J., 2013. "Climate policy with Bentham–Rawls preferences," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 118(3), pages 424-428.
    15. Thomas Michielsen, 2013. "Environmental Catastrophes under Time-Inconsistent Preferences," Working Papers 2013.55, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    16. Mohammad Karamouz & Sara Nazif & Mohammad Sherafat & Zahra Zahmatkesh, 2014. "Development of an Optimal Reservoir Operation Scheme Using Extended Evolutionary Computing Algorithms Based on Conflict Resolution Approach: A Case Study," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(11), pages 3539-3554, September.
    17. Bontems, Philippe & Martinet, Vincent & Rotillon, Gilles & Withagen, Cees, 2015. "Interactions between agricultural economics and environmental and resource economics in European research: Insights from the theory of non-renewable resources," Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, Editions NecPlus, vol. 96(01), pages 167-185, March.
    18. Tol, Richard S.J., 2013. "Targets for global climate policy: An overview," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 911-928.
    19. Michielsen, T.O., 2013. "Environmental Catastrophes Under Time-inconsistent Preferences," Discussion Paper 2013-013, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    20. Kitti, Mitri, 2018. "Sustainable social choice under risk," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 19-31.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:37:y:2023:i:8:d:10.1007_s11269-023-03456-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.