IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v37y2023i15d10.1007_s11269-023-03643-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resolving Trans-Boundary Water Conflicts: Third-Party Mediation Using an Inverse Approach of GMCR Under Incomplete Preference Environments

Author

Listed:
  • Xiufen Gu

    (Hohai University
    Yantai University)

  • Lailei Gu

    (Northwest Normal University)

  • Dayong Wang

    (Hohai University)

  • Sajad Jamshidi

    (Purdue University)

Abstract

Trans-boundary water conflicts and the ensuing social security have become concerning issues. However, the existing studies regarding trans-boundary water management mainly focus on river basin countries while ignoring the important role of third-party mediation institutions in resolving water conflicts. Thus, river basin countries and third-party mediation institutions are the objects of this research, which focuses on the strategies and behavior of third-party mediation institutions that are significant in alleviating conflict situations and formulating sustainable trans-boundary water resource allocation plans. The factors that influence the decision-making of third-party mediation institutions are determined based on other decision makers’ (DMs’) known preferences. Therefore, according to the uncertainty theory and the cognitive preference model, a novel inverse problem model of the graph model for conflict resolution is constructed to obtain the required DM preference information in complex and uncertain conflicts. Then, the new proposed method is applied to trans-boundary water conflicts in the Lancang-Mekong River Basin to illustrate its correctness and practicality. The results show that (1) a third-party management institution can directly promote a win–win situation among all DMs by obtaining other DMs’ preferences; (2) effective supervision by a third party can promote all those involved to reach a stable state faster; and (3) third parties can promote sustainable trans-boundary water resource allocation. The proposed methods and analysis results offer decision-making support for third-party management institutions in trans-boundary water resource conflicts and provide a scientific basis for mediating similar water resource conflicts within and beyond China.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiufen Gu & Lailei Gu & Dayong Wang & Sajad Jamshidi, 2023. "Resolving Trans-Boundary Water Conflicts: Third-Party Mediation Using an Inverse Approach of GMCR Under Incomplete Preference Environments," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(15), pages 6071-6088, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:37:y:2023:i:15:d:10.1007_s11269-023-03643-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-023-03643-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-023-03643-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-023-03643-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liangyan Tao & Xuebi Su & Saad Ahmed Javed, 2021. "Inverse Preference Optimization in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution based on the Genetic Algorithm," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 1085-1112, October.
    2. Cailian Hao & Denghua Yan & Mohammed Gedefaw & Tianling Qin & Hao Wang & Zhilei Yu, 2021. "Accounting of Transboundary Ecocompensation Standards Based on Water Quantity Allocation and Water Quality Control Targets," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(6), pages 1731-1756, April.
    3. Rêgo, Leandro Chaves & Silva, Hugo Victor & Rodrigues, Carlos Diego, 2021. "Optimizing the cost of preference manipulation in the graph model for conflict resolution," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 392(C).
    4. D. Marc Kilgour & Keith W. Hipel, 2005. "The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution: Past, Present, and Future," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 14(6), pages 441-460, November.
    5. Zhao, Laijun & Li, Changmin & Huang, Rongbing & Si, Steven & Xue, Jian & Huang, Wei & Hu, Yue, 2013. "Harmonizing model with transfer tax on water pollution across regional boundaries in a China’s lake basin," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 377-382.
    6. Tewodros Negash Kahsay & Onno Kuik & Roy Brouwer & Pieter Zaag, 2018. "The Transboundary Impacts of Trade Liberalization and Climate Change on the Nile Basin Economies and Water Resource Availability," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(3), pages 935-947, February.
    7. Tacconi, Luca, 2012. "Redefining payments for environmental services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 29-36.
    8. Chang, Shuhua & Qin, Weihua & Wang, Xinyu, 2018. "Dynamic optimal strategies in transboundary pollution game under learning by doing," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 490(C), pages 139-147.
    9. Wang, Junjie & Hipel, Keith W. & Fang, Liping & Dang, Yaoguo, 2018. "Matrix representations of the inverse problem in the graph model for conflict resolution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(1), pages 282-293.
    10. Yu Han & Haiyan Xu & Liping Fang & Keith W. Hipel, 2022. "An Integer Programming Approach to Solving the Inverse Graph Model for Conflict Resolution with Two Decision Makers," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 23-48, February.
    11. Muhammad Adnan Shahid & Piero Boccardo & Muhammad Usman & Adriana Albanese & Muhammad Uzair Qamar, 2017. "Predicting Peak Flows in Real Time through Event Based Hydrologic Modeling for a Trans-Boundary River Catchment," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(3), pages 793-810, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jisi Fu & Tianwei Lu & Bin Xu & Jieyu Li & Junwei Zhou & Bin Xiong & Zhongzheng He, 2024. "Water Resources Allocation in a Transboundary River Based on a Rubinstein Bargaining Model," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 38(2), pages 639-663, January.
    2. Liang Yuan & Chenyuan Liu & Xia Wu & Weijun He & Yang Kong & Dagmawi Mulugeta Degefu & Thomas Stephen Ramsey, 2024. "A Set Pair Analysis Method for Assessing and Forecasting Water Conflict Risk in Transboundary River Basins," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 38(2), pages 775-791, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huang, Yuming & Ge, Bingfeng & Hipel, Keith W. & Fang, Liping & Zhao, Bin & Yang, Kewei, 2023. "Solving the inverse graph model for conflict resolution using a hybrid metaheuristic algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(2), pages 806-819.
    2. Zhu, Yan & Dong, Yucheng & Zhang, Hengjie & Fang, Liping, 2025. "Exploring the minimum cost conflict mediation path to a desired resolution within the inverse graph model framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 321(2), pages 543-564.
    3. Zhu, Ziming & Kilgour, D. Marc & Hipel, Keith W. & Yu, Jing, 2025. "Interrelationships of Non-cooperative, Classical and Pareto coalitional stability definitions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 321(3), pages 884-894.
    4. Liangyan Tao & Xuebi Su & Saad Ahmed Javed, 2021. "Inverse Preference Optimization in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution based on the Genetic Algorithm," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 1085-1112, October.
    5. Yu Han & Haiyan Xu & Liping Fang & Keith W. Hipel, 2022. "An Integer Programming Approach to Solving the Inverse Graph Model for Conflict Resolution with Two Decision Makers," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 23-48, February.
    6. Li, Huiquan & Guo, Genlong, 2019. "A differential game analysis of multipollutant transboundary pollution in river basin," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 535(C).
    7. Qingye Han & Yuming Zhu & Ginger Y. Ke & Hongli Lin, 2019. "A Two-Stage Decision Framework for Resolving Brownfield Conflicts," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-19, March.
    8. Keith W. Hipel & Liping Fang & D. Marc Kilgour, 2020. "The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution: Reflections on Three Decades of Development," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 11-60, February.
    9. Fangju Jia & Dong‐dong Wang & Kun Zhou & Lianshui Li, 2022. "Differential decision analysis of transboundary pollution considering the participation of the central government," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 1684-1703, September.
    10. Liu, Yi & Chen, Xia & Zhuang, Jun & Dong, Yucheng, 2024. "Defensive resource allocation in terrorism conflict management based on graph model with relative preferences," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    11. Qian Li & Yan Chen & Shikun Sun & Muyuan Zhu & Jing Xue & Zihan Gao & Jinfeng Zhao & Yihe Tang, 2022. "Research on Crop Irrigation Schedules Under Deficit Irrigation—A Meta-analysis," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(12), pages 4799-4817, September.
    12. Lu Xiao & Huacong Ding & Yu Zhong & Chaojie Wang, 2023. "Optimal Control of Industrial Pollution under Stochastic Differential Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    13. Xiaorui Wang & Shen Hu, 2024. "How do organizations in Chinese agriculture perceive sustainability certification schemes? An exploratory analysis," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 42(3), May.
    14. Boucekkine, Raouf & Fabbri, Giorgio & Federico, Salvatore & Gozzi, Fausto, 2021. "From firm to global-level pollution control: The case of transboundary pollution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(1), pages 331-345.
    15. Desbureaux, Sébastien & Brimont, Laura, 2015. "Between economic loss and social identity: The multi-dimensional cost of avoiding deforestation in Eastern Madagascar," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 10-20.
    16. Levin-Koopman, Jason & Carrico, Caitlyn & Falsetti, Benedetta, 2021. "The Advent of the AfCFTA: New Possibilities and Implications for the African Land-Water-Climate-Food Nexus," Conference papers 333292, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    17. Trædal, Leif Tore & Vedeld, Pål Olav & Pétursson, Jón Geir, 2016. "Analyzing the transformations of forest PES in Vietnam: Implications for REDD+," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 109-117.
    18. Wang, Taishan & Zhang, Junlong & You, Li & Zeng, Xueting & Ma, Yuan & Li, Yongping & Huang, Guohe, 2023. "Optimal design of two-dimensional water trading considering hybrid “three waters”-government participation for an agricultural watershed," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    19. Cranford, Matthew & Mourato, Susana, 2014. "Credit-Based Payments for Ecosystem Services: Evidence from a Choice Experiment in Ecuador," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 503-520.
    20. Mangubhai, Sangeeta & Sykes, Helen & Manley, Marita & Vukikomoala, Kiji & Beattie, Madeline, 2020. "Contributions of tourism-based Marine Conservation Agreements to natural resource management in Fiji," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:37:y:2023:i:15:d:10.1007_s11269-023-03643-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.