IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v31y2017i11d10.1007_s11269-017-1674-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uncertainty of the Agricultural Grey Water Footprint Based on High Resolution Primary Data

Author

Listed:
  • Rodrigo Gil

    (Universidad Jorge Tadeo Lozano)

  • Carlos Ricardo Bojacá

    (Universidad Jorge Tadeo Lozano)

  • Eddie Schrevens

    (University of Leuven)

Abstract

The water footprint has been established as an indicator to assess water use by a product. However, the grey component of the water footprint (GWF) has received the least focus compared to the green and blue components. In developing countries, the GWF estimation is restricted by the availability of data concerning crop practices. The various biophysical and socioeconomic settings configure a system difficult to standardize even for small areas. The objective of this study was to assess the GWF uncertainty due to primary data for the main greenhouse tomato production from Colombia. The GWF for N and P fertilizers and pesticides were estimated based on detailed crop information collected from 2010 to 2013. The uncertainty was evaluated by fitting univariate theoretical distributions to the empirical distributions of the pollutants’ GWFs. Growers applied on average 419.2 and 201.9 kg ha−1 of N and P fertilizers per cycle, respectively. The average rates of application for fungicides and insecticides were 11.8 and 3.5 kg ha−1, respectively. The average GWF for N and P fertilizers and pesticides were 79, 6182.1 and 223.2 m3 t−1, respectively. The empirical distributions of the GWF for N fertilizer and pesticides were fitted to a lognormal distribution while for P fertilizer the Weibull distribution showed the best fit. The pesticides GWF showed the highest coefficient of variation (615.3%), however the results for N and P fertilizers were also high with values of 79.8 and 74.1%, respectively. Additional to the methodological choices involved in the GWF estimation, the primary data is a relevant uncertainty source, which should be considered for systems operating under unstandardized practices. The decision making process to regulate the pollutants losses from the agroecosystem, based on environmental assessments such as the GWF, should consider all sources of uncertainty and address its implications in a quantitatively form.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodrigo Gil & Carlos Ricardo Bojacá & Eddie Schrevens, 2017. "Uncertainty of the Agricultural Grey Water Footprint Based on High Resolution Primary Data," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(11), pages 3389-3400, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:31:y:2017:i:11:d:10.1007_s11269-017-1674-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-017-1674-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-017-1674-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-017-1674-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Duarte, Rosa & Pinilla, Vicente & Serrano, Ana, 2014. "The water footprint of the Spanish agricultural sector: 1860–2010," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 200-207.
    2. de Fraiture, Charlotte & Wichelns, Dennis, 2010. "Satisfying future water demands for agriculture," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(4), pages 502-511, April.
    3. Hejazi, Mohamad & Edmonds, James & Clarke, Leon & Kyle, Page & Davies, Evan & Chaturvedi, Vaibhav & Wise, Marshall & Patel, Pralit & Eom, Jiyong & Calvin, Katherine & Moss, Richard & Kim, Son, 2014. "Long-term global water projections using six socioeconomic scenarios in an integrated assessment modeling framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 205-226.
    4. Julian Fulton & Heather Cooley & Peter Gleick, 2014. "Water Footprint Outcomes and Policy Relevance Change with Scale Considered: Evidence from California," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(11), pages 3637-3649, September.
    5. Chapagain, A.K. & Hoekstra, A.Y., 2011. "The blue, green and grey water footprint of rice from production and consumption perspectives," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(4), pages 749-758, February.
    6. Bocchiola, D. & Nana, E. & Soncini, A., 2013. "Impact of climate change scenarios on crop yield and water footprint of maize in the Po valley of Italy," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 50-61.
    7. S. Sun & P. Wu & Y. Wang & X. Zhao, 2013. "Temporal Variability of Water Footprint for Maize Production: The Case of Beijing from 1978 to 2008," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(7), pages 2447-2463, May.
    8. Roland T. Rust & Duncan Simester & Roderick J. Brodie & V. Nilikant, 1995. "Model Selection Criteria: An Investigation of Relative Accuracy, Posterior Probabilities, and Combinations of Criteria," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(2), pages 322-333, February.
    9. Nadja Stadlinger & Aviti Mmochi & Sonja Dobo & Emma Gyllbäck & Linda Kumblad, 2011. "Pesticide use among smallholder rice farmers in Tanzania," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 641-656, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fei Yin & Chang-xin Xu, 2020. "Quantifying the Inter- and Intra-Annual Variations in Regional Water Consumption and Scarcity Incorporating Water Quantity and Quality," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(8), pages 2313-2327, June.
    2. Rui Shu & Xinchun Cao & Mengyang Wu, 2021. "Clarifying Regional Water Scarcity in Agriculture based on the Theory of Blue, Green and Grey Water Footprints," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(3), pages 1101-1118, February.
    3. Mingzhi Yang & Weihua Xiao & Yong Zhao & Xudong Li & Ya Huang & Fan Lu & Baodeng Hou & Baoqi Li, 2018. "Assessment of Potential Climate Change Effects on the Rice Yield and Water Footprint in the Nanliujiang Catchment, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Leonardo Bertassello & Marc F. Müller & Adam Wiechman & Gopal Penny & Marta Tuninetti & Michèle C. Müller-Itten, 2023. "Food demand displaced by global refugee migration influences water use in already water stressed countries," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Duarte, Rosa & Pinilla, Vicente & Serrano, Ana, 2014. "The water footprint of the Spanish agricultural sector: 1860–2010," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 200-207.
    2. Cao, Xinchun & Zeng, Wen & Wu, Mengyang & Guo, Xiangping & Wang, Weiguang, 2020. "Hybrid analytical framework for regional agricultural water resource utilization and efficiency evaluation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    3. Namra Ghaffar & Bushra Noreen & Maryam Muhammad Ali & Amna Ali, 2021. "Rice Yield Estimation in Sawat Region Incorporating The Local Physio-Climatic Parameters," International Journal of Agriculture & Sustainable Development, 50sea, vol. 3(2), pages 46-50, June.
    4. Yu Zhang & Qing Tian & Huan Hu & Miao Yu, 2019. "Water Footprint of Food Consumption by Chinese Residents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-15, October.
    5. Yu Zhang & Jin-he Zhang & Qing Tian, 2021. "Virtual Water Trade in the Service Sector: China’s Inbound Tourism as a Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Xiaoxue Zheng & Lijie Qin & Hongshi He, 2020. "Impacts of Climatic and Agricultural Input Factors on the Water Footprint of Crop Production in Jilin Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-19, August.
    7. Zhao, X. & Tillotson, M.R. & Liu, Y.W. & Guo, W. & Yang, A.H. & Li, Y.F., 2017. "Index decomposition analysis of urban crop water footprint," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 348(C), pages 25-32.
    8. Wang, Lei & Li, Lianqing & Cheng, Kun & Pan, Genxing, 2019. "Comprehensive evaluation of environmental footprints of regional crop production: A case study of Chizhou City, China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Yue Zhang & Kai Huang & Yajuan Yu & Linxiu Wu, 2020. "An uncertainty-based multivariate statistical approach to predict crop water footprint under climate change: a case study of Lake Dianchi Basin, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(1), pages 91-110, October.
    10. Mingzhi Yang & Weihua Xiao & Yong Zhao & Xudong Li & Ya Huang & Fan Lu & Baodeng Hou & Baoqi Li, 2018. "Assessment of Potential Climate Change Effects on the Rice Yield and Water Footprint in the Nanliujiang Catchment, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, January.
    11. Mengran Fu & Bin Guo & Weijiao Wang & Juan Wang & Lihua Zhao & Jianlin Wang, 2019. "Comprehensive Assessment of Water Footprints and Water Scarcity Pressure for Main Crops in Shandong Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, March.
    12. Bocchiola, D., 2015. "Impact of potential climate change on crop yield and water footprint of rice in the Po valley of Italy," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 223-237.
    13. Funk, Bryana & Amer, Saud A. & Ward, Frank A., 2023. "Sustainable aquifer management for food security," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    14. Yue Zhang & Kai Huang & Yajuan Yu & Tingting Hu & Jing Wei, 2015. "Impact of climate change and drought regime on water footprint of crop production: the case of Lake Dianchi Basin, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 79(1), pages 549-566, October.
    15. Daxue Kan & Weichiao Huang, 2020. "An Empirical Study of the Impact of Urbanization on Industry Water Footprint in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, March.
    16. Zhang, Shulin & Su, Xiaoling & Singh, Vijay P & Ayantobo, Olusola Olaitan & Xie, Juan, 2018. "Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) decomposition analysis of changes in agricultural water use: a case study of the middle reaches of the Heihe River basin, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 422-430.
    17. Al Zayed, Islam Sabry & Elagib, Nadir Ahmed & Ribbe, Lars & Heinrich, Jürgen, 2016. "Satellite-based evapotranspiration over Gezira Irrigation Scheme, Sudan: A comparative study," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 66-76.
    18. Sarstedt, Marko & Salcher, André, 2007. "Modellselektion in Finite Mixture PLS-Modellen," Discussion Papers in Business Administration 1394, University of Munich, Munich School of Management.
    19. Vogel, Everton & Martinelli, Gabrielli & Artuzo, Felipe Dalzotto, 2021. "Environmental and economic performance of paddy field-based crop-livestock systems in Southern Brazil," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    20. Sang-Hyun Lee & Makoto Taniguchi & Rabi H. Mohtar & Jin-Yong Choi & Seung-Hwan Yoo, 2018. "An Analysis of the Water-Energy-Food-Land Requirements and CO 2 Emissions for Food Security of Rice in Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:31:y:2017:i:11:d:10.1007_s11269-017-1674-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.