IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stpapr/v61y2020i3d10.1007_s00362-018-0988-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantile regression for nonlinear mixed effects models: a likelihood based perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Christian E. Galarza

    (Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral, ESPOL
    Universidade Estadual de Campinas)

  • Luis M. Castro

    (Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile)

  • Francisco Louzada

    (Universidade de São Paulo)

  • Victor H. Lachos

    (University of Connecticut)

Abstract

Longitudinal data are frequently analyzed using normal mixed effects models. Moreover, the traditional estimation methods are based on mean regression, which leads to non-robust parameter estimation under non-normal error distribution. However, at least in principle, quantile regression (QR) is more robust in the presence of outliers/influential observations and misspecification of the error distributions when compared to the conventional mean regression approach. In this context, this paper develops a likelihood-based approach for estimating QR models with correlated continuous longitudinal data using the asymmetric Laplace distribution. Our approach relies on the stochastic approximation of the EM algorithm (SAEM algorithm), obtaining maximum likelihood estimates of the fixed effects and variance components in the case of nonlinear mixed effects (NLME) models. We evaluate the finite sample performance of the SAEM algorithm and asymptotic properties of the ML estimates through simulation experiments. Moreover, two real life datasets are used to illustrate our proposed method using the $$\texttt {qrNLMM}$$qrNLMM package from $$\texttt {R}$$R.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian E. Galarza & Luis M. Castro & Francisco Louzada & Victor H. Lachos, 2020. "Quantile regression for nonlinear mixed effects models: a likelihood based perspective," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(3), pages 1281-1307, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:61:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s00362-018-0988-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s00362-018-0988-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00362-018-0988-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00362-018-0988-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Koenker, Roger, 2004. "Quantile regression for longitudinal data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 74-89, October.
    2. J. G. Booth & J. P. Hobert, 1999. "Maximizing generalized linear mixed model likelihoods with an automated Monte Carlo EM algorithm," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 61(1), pages 265-285.
    3. Lachos, Victor H. & Castro, Luis M. & Dey, Dipak K., 2013. "Bayesian inference in nonlinear mixed-effects models using normal independent distributions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 237-252.
    4. Mu, Yunming & He, Xuming, 2007. "Power Transformation Toward a Linear Regression Quantile," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 102, pages 269-279, March.
    5. A. Aghamohammadi & S. Mohammadi, 2017. "Bayesian analysis of penalized quantile regression for longitudinal data," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 1035-1053, December.
    6. Jing Wang, 2012. "Bayesian quantile regression for parametric nonlinear mixed effects models," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 21(3), pages 279-295, August.
    7. Yu, Keming & Moyeed, Rana A., 2001. "Bayesian quantile regression," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 54(4), pages 437-447, October.
    8. Yangxin Huang & Getachew Dagne, 2011. "A Bayesian Approach to Joint Mixed-Effects Models with a Skew-Normal Distribution and Measurement Errors in Covariates," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(1), pages 260-269, March.
    9. Liu Yuan & Bottai Matteo, 2009. "Mixed-Effects Models for Conditional Quantiles with Longitudinal Data," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 1-24, November.
    10. Galvao Jr., Antonio F., 2011. "Quantile regression for dynamic panel data with fixed effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 164(1), pages 142-157, September.
    11. Alan S. Perelson & Paulina Essunger & Yunzhen Cao & Mika Vesanen & Arlene Hurley & Kalle Saksela & Martin Markowitz & David D. Ho, 1997. "Decay characteristics of HIV-1-infected compartments during combination therapy," Nature, Nature, vol. 387(6629), pages 188-191, May.
    12. Tomasz Kozubowski & Saralees Nadarajah, 2010. "Multitude of Laplace distributions," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 127-148, January.
    13. Ying Yuan & Guosheng Yin, 2010. "Bayesian Quantile Regression for Longitudinal Studies with Nonignorable Missing Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(1), pages 105-114, March.
    14. Fu, Liya & Wang, You-Gan, 2012. "Quantile regression for longitudinal data with a working correlation model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(8), pages 2526-2538.
    15. Ole E. Barndorff‐Nielsen & Neil Shephard, 2001. "Non‐Gaussian Ornstein–Uhlenbeck‐based models and some of their uses in financial economics," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(2), pages 167-241.
    16. Kuhn, E. & Lavielle, M., 2005. "Maximum likelihood estimation in nonlinear mixed effects models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 1020-1038, June.
    17. Wu L., 2002. "A Joint Model for Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Models With Censoring and Covariates Measured With Error, With Application to AIDS Studies," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 97, pages 955-964, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaowen Dai & Libin Jin & Lei Shi, 2023. "Quantile regression in random effects meta-analysis model," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 32(2), pages 469-492, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Marino & Alessio Farcomeni, 2015. "Linear quantile regression models for longitudinal experiments: an overview," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 73(2), pages 229-247, August.
    2. Hanze Zhang & Yangxin Huang, 2020. "Quantile regression-based Bayesian joint modeling analysis of longitudinal–survival data, with application to an AIDS cohort study," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 339-368, April.
    3. Ali Aghamohammadi, 2018. "Bayesian analysis of dynamic panel data by penalized quantile regression," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 27(1), pages 91-108, March.
    4. Yuzhu Tian & Er’qian Li & Maozai Tian, 2016. "Bayesian joint quantile regression for mixed effects models with censoring and errors in covariates," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 1031-1057, September.
    5. Georges Bresson & Guy Lacroix & Mohammad Arshad Rahman, 2021. "Bayesian panel quantile regression for binary outcomes with correlated random effects: an application on crime recidivism in Canada," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 227-259, January.
    6. Genya Kobayashi & Hideo Kozumi, 2012. "Bayesian analysis of quantile regression for censored dynamic panel data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 359-380, June.
    7. Geraci, Marco, 2019. "Modelling and estimation of nonlinear quantile regression with clustered data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 30-46.
    8. Jang, Woosung & Wang, Huixia Judy, 2015. "A semiparametric Bayesian approach for joint-quantile regression with clustered data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 99-115.
    9. Siamak Ghasemzadeh & Mojtaba Ganjali & Taban Baghfalaki, 2018. "Bayesian quantile regression for analyzing ordinal longitudinal responses in the presence of non-ignorable missingness," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 76(3), pages 321-348, December.
    10. Xiaowen Dai & Libin Jin & Lei Shi, 2023. "Quantile regression in random effects meta-analysis model," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 32(2), pages 469-492, June.
    11. Hemant Kulkarni & Jayabrata Biswas & Kiranmoy Das, 2019. "A joint quantile regression model for multiple longitudinal outcomes," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 103(4), pages 453-473, December.
    12. Mohammad Arshad Rahman & Angela Vossmeyer, 2019. "Estimation and Applications of Quantile Regression for Binary Longitudinal Data," Advances in Econometrics, in: Topics in Identification, Limited Dependent Variables, Partial Observability, Experimentation, and Flexible Modeling: Part B, volume 40, pages 157-191, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    13. Yuzhu Tian & Manlai Tang & Maozai Tian, 2018. "Joint modeling for mixed-effects quantile regression of longitudinal data with detection limits and covariates measured with error, with application to AIDS studies," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 1563-1587, December.
    14. A. Aghamohammadi & S. Mohammadi, 2017. "Bayesian analysis of penalized quantile regression for longitudinal data," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 1035-1053, December.
    15. Christian E. Galarza & Panpan Zhang & Víctor H. Lachos, 2021. "Logistic Quantile Regression for Bounded Outcomes Using a Family of Heavy-Tailed Distributions," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 83(2), pages 325-349, November.
    16. Lu, Xiaosun & Huang, Yangxin & Zhu, Yiliang, 2016. "Finite mixture of nonlinear mixed-effects joint models in the presence of missing and mismeasured covariate, with application to AIDS studies," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 119-130.
    17. Dries Benoit & Rahim Alhamzawi & Keming Yu, 2013. "Bayesian lasso binary quantile regression," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 2861-2873, December.
    18. Jing Wang, 2012. "Bayesian quantile regression for parametric nonlinear mixed effects models," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 21(3), pages 279-295, August.
    19. Samson, Adeline & Lavielle, Marc & Mentre, France, 2006. "Extension of the SAEM algorithm to left-censored data in nonlinear mixed-effects model: Application to HIV dynamics model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 1562-1574, December.
    20. Philip Kostov & Julie Le Gallo, 2015. "Convergence: A Story of Quantiles and Spillovers," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(4), pages 552-576, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:61:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s00362-018-0988-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.