IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/soinre/v86y2008i3p401-415.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Institutional vs. the Academic Definition of the Quality of Work Life. What is the Focus of the European Commission?

Author

Listed:
  • Vicente Royuela
  • Jordi López-Tamayo
  • Jordi Suriñach

Abstract

In recent years, we have seen how the quality of work life has been focused and defined by the European Commission (EC). In our study we compare the EC definition with the academic one and try to see how close they are. We also analyse the possibility of applying the institutional definition to the Spanish case through the development of specific indicators. Our main conclusions are that QWL is increasingly important for policy makers. In addition, it is essential to have objective indicators and to conduct surveys in order to reliably measure QWL.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Vicente Royuela & Jordi López-Tamayo & Jordi Suriñach, 2008. "The Institutional vs. the Academic Definition of the Quality of Work Life. What is the Focus of the European Commission?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 86(3), pages 401-415, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:86:y:2008:i:3:p:401-415
    DOI: 10.1007/s11205-007-9175-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11205-007-9175-6
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11205-007-9175-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean-Pierre Martel & Gilles Dupuis, 2006. "Quality of Work Life: Theoretical and Methodological Problems, and Presentation of a New Model and Measuring Instrument," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 77(2), pages 333-368, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Selda TASDEMIR AFSAR, 2014. "Organizational Commitment and Determinants of the Commitment in the context of Changing Working Conditions: Turkey Example," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 0702100, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    2. Agnieszka Krugielka & Grazyna Bartkowiak & Sebastian Dama, 2021. "Functioning of Academic Teachers in the Conditions of the COVID-19 Epidemy in Poland in 2020 (Qualitative Test on the Basis of Self-Assessment)," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 5), pages 269-287.
    3. Jorge Sinval & M. Joseph Sirgy & Dong-Jin Lee & João Marôco, 2020. "The Quality of Work Life Scale: Validity Evidence from Brazil and Portugal," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 15(5), pages 1323-1351, November.
    4. Nguyen Dinh Tho, 2018. "A Configurational Role of Human Capital Resources in the Quality of Work Life of Marketers: FsQCA and SEM Findings from Vietnam," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 13(2), pages 461-478, June.
    5. Vicente Royuela & Jordi López-Tamayo & Jordi Suriñach, 2009. "Results of a Quality of Work Life Index in Spain. A Comparison of Survey Results and Aggregate Social Indicators," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 90(2), pages 225-241, January.
    6. Nidhi Yadav & Shikha Dixit, 2017. "Authentic Leadership and Employees’ Work-related Quality of Life: A Study of IT Organizations in India," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(4), pages 222-222, March.
    7. M. Agovino & A. Rapposelli, 2017. "Regional Performance Trends in Providing Employment for Persons with Disabilities: Evidence from Italy," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 130(2), pages 593-615, January.
    8. Ángel Díaz-Chao & Pilar Ficapal-Cusí & Joan Torrent-Sellens, 2016. "Economic Crisis and Job Quality in Spain: A Multi-dimensional and Micro-data Empirical Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 125(2), pages 613-633, January.
    9. Renaud Gaucher & Ruut Veenhoven, 2022. "What is in the name? Content analysis of questionnaires on perceived quality of one’s work life," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1045-1072, June.
    10. Andrzej Zybała, 2021. "Direct Participation in Poland Compared with Other European Countries," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 1, pages 9-31.
    11. Mónica Sofía Gómez & Luis Armando Galvis-Aponte & Vicente Royuela, 2015. "“Calidad de vida laboral en Colombia: un índice multidimensional difuso”," AQR Working Papers 201513, University of Barcelona, Regional Quantitative Analysis Group, revised Apr 2016.
    12. Nor Azimah Chew Abdullah & Nazlina Zakaria & Nida Zahoor, 2021. "Developments in Quality of Work-Life Research and Directions for Future Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    13. Lilis Surienty & T. Ramayah & May-Chiun Lo & Azlin Tarmizi, 2014. "Quality of Work Life and Turnover Intention: A Partial Least Square (PLS) Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 119(1), pages 405-420, October.
    14. Hamed Mohammadi & Mahsa Tavakoli & Sahar Yazdanian & Mohammad Babaei, 2017. "An Investigation of Factors Affecting the Employees' Quality of Work Life and Assessment of the Status of These Factors," Business and Management Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 3(4), pages 23-38, December.
    15. Ramawickrama J. & H. H. D. N. P. Opatha & PushpaKumari M. D., 2017. "Quality of Work Life, Job Satisfaction, and the Facets of the Relationship between the Two Constructs," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(4), pages 167-182, April.
    16. María Cascales Mira, 2021. "New Model for Measuring Job Quality: Developing an European Intrinsic Job Quality Index (EIJQI)," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 155(2), pages 625-645, June.
    17. Elena Stefana & Filippo Marciano & Diana Rossi & Paola Cocca & Giuseppe Tomasoni, 2021. "Composite Indicators to Measure Quality of Working Life in Europe: A Systematic Review," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 157(3), pages 1047-1078, October.
    18. Juana Patlán Pérez, 2013. "Efecto del burnout y la sobrecarga en la calidad de vida en el trabajo," Estudios Gerenciales, Universidad Icesi, December.
    19. Deepika Dixit & Anubha Shekhar Sinha, 2020. "I Am My Own Boss: Do I Have Quality of Work-Life?," Working papers 353, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.
    20. Mónica Sofía Gómez-Salcedo & Luis Armando Galvis-Aponte & Vicente Royuela, 2017. "Quality of Work Life in Colombia: A Multidimensional Fuzzy Indicator," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 130(3), pages 911-936, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Quality of work life; European commission;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:86:y:2008:i:3:p:401-415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.