IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/soinre/v177y2025i1d10.1007_s11205-025-03567-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Study through Item Analysis of CCRAM28 and CCRAM10

Author

Listed:
  • Kyeongwon Lee

    (Halla University)

  • Hyun Lee

    (Mokwon University)

Abstract

In recent times, the global community has increasingly experienced disasters both directly and indirectly, raising interest in community resiliency to address such challenges. The Conjoint Community Resiliency Assessment Measure (CCRAM) was developed as an integrated and multidimensional scale for assessing community resiliency. This study aims to analyze this scale at the item level for its application in Korean society. The study analyzed responses from a total of 1,200 adults, 400 from each of the three survey phases conducted nationwide. As a result of the factor analysis, items 18 and 26, which showed low factor loadings, were removed, and it was found that the construct consisted of 3 factors. Furthermore, items 14 and 23 were excluded due to poor fit identified through item analysis employing the Rasch model from Item Response Theory. The number of response categories was found to be appropriately set as a 5-point Likert scale, like the original scale. This research facilitates the application of CCRAM in Korea, contributing to the enhancement and restoration of community resiliency.

Suggested Citation

  • Kyeongwon Lee & Hyun Lee, 2025. "Comparative Study through Item Analysis of CCRAM28 and CCRAM10," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 177(1), pages 411-424, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:177:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11205-025-03567-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s11205-025-03567-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11205-025-03567-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11205-025-03567-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:177:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11205-025-03567-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.