IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/snopef/v5y2024i1d10.1007_s43069-024-00309-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selection of Academic Staff Based on a Hybrid Multi-criteria Decision Method Under Neutrosophic Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Antonios Paraskevas

    (University of Macedonia)

  • Michael Madas

    (University of Macedonia)

Abstract

Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) is a decision-making process that involves assessing and selecting the best alternative from a group of options based on various criteria or qualities. In this research work, we propose and elucidate the theory of neutrosophic logic, which is unique in its approach to evaluating candidates’ performance in a manner that takes into account significant elements and criteria that are essential for the overall process when dealing with unclear, inaccurate, or incomplete data. We propose a novel hybrid integrated MCDM methodology based upon neutrosophic Delphi (N-Delphi) and neutrosophic AHP (N-AHP) methods, which takes into consideration the importance of each decision-maker and their preferences per evaluation criterion. A new MAXMIN threshold value technique treats the criteria under consideration as the decision alternatives and their score functions as their payoff values, thus reducing unnecessary resources by eliminating unimportant criteria during the personnel selection process.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonios Paraskevas & Michael Madas, 2024. "Selection of Academic Staff Based on a Hybrid Multi-criteria Decision Method Under Neutrosophic Environment," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-27, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:snopef:v:5:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s43069-024-00309-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s43069-024-00309-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43069-024-00309-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s43069-024-00309-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:snopef:v:5:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s43069-024-00309-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.