IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sjobre/v76y2024i1d10.1007_s41471-023-00176-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conceptualizing the Integration of Business and Private Components in Individual Information Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Julia Lanzl

    (Branch Business & Information Systems Engineering of the Fraunhofer FIT
    FIM Research Center for Information Management
    University of Hohenheim)

  • Lena Utz

    (Branch Business & Information Systems Engineering of the Fraunhofer FIT
    FIM Research Center for Information Management)

  • Patrick Afflerbach

    (FIM Research Center for Information Management)

  • Henner Gimpel

    (Branch Business & Information Systems Engineering of the Fraunhofer FIT
    FIM Research Center for Information Management
    University of Hohenheim)

Abstract

Individuals build their individual information system (IIS) with which they manage the boundary between different domains of life. In this age of permanent mobile accessibility, however, the boundary between the private and business domains can become blurred. While some users try to maintain a degree of separation between the two IIS sub-systems (the private and the business information system), others integrate them. Understanding such integration is essential as it affects well-being and performance in both domains. To further this understanding, we introduce a conceptualization of IIS that distinguishes between four layers of IIS: devices, digital identities, relationships, and information. To measure IIS integration, we develop a method based on the IIS components’ usage frequencies in each domain. We evaluate our conceptualization as well as our measurement method by empirically testing a theoretical model of IIS integration on multiple layers. Our data provides empirical support for the importance of relationship integration as one of the four layers. This leads us to the conclusion that even though IIS are composed of four layers, only the relationship layer is of interest regarding IIS integration. Our results are of interest and service to individuals, organizations, and IT designers who aim to manage IIS integration for individual and organizational benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia Lanzl & Lena Utz & Patrick Afflerbach & Henner Gimpel, 2024. "Conceptualizing the Integration of Business and Private Components in Individual Information Systems," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 76(1), pages 29-61, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:76:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s41471-023-00176-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s41471-023-00176-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41471-023-00176-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41471-023-00176-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nancy P. Rothbard & Katherine W. Phillips & Tracy L. Dumas, 2005. "Managing Multiple Roles: Work-Family Policies and Individuals’ Desires for Segmentation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 243-258, June.
    2. Paul Benjamin Lowry & Jun Zhang & Chuang Wang & Mikko Siponen, 2016. "Why Do Adults Engage in Cyberbullying on Social Media? An Integration of Online Disinhibition and Deindividuation Effects with the Social Structure and Social Learning Model," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 962-986, December.
    3. Niehaves, Björn & Köffer, Sebastian & Ortbach, Kevin & Katschewitz, Stefan, 2012. "Towards an IT consumerization theory: A theory and practice review," ERCIS Working Papers 13, University of Münster, European Research Center for Information Systems (ERCIS).
    4. Gary C. Moore & Izak Benbasat, 1991. "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 192-222, September.
    5. Armstrong, J. Scott & Overton, Terry S., 1977. "Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys," MPRA Paper 81694, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Richard Baskerville, 2011. "Individual information systems as a research arena," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 251-254, May.
    7. Hope Koch & Ester Gonzalez & Dorothy Leidner, 2012. "Bridging the work/social divide: the emotional response to organizational social networking sites," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(6), pages 699-717, November.
    8. Steven Alter, 2008. "Defining information systems as work systems: implications for the IS field," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(5), pages 448-469, October.
    9. Youngjin Yoo & Ola Henfridsson & Kalle Lyytinen, 2010. "Research Commentary ---The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 724-735, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aziz Barhmi & Omar Hajaji, 2023. "Multidisciplinary Approach to Supply Chain Resilience: Conceptualization and Scale Development," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2023(5), pages 43-69.
    2. Vendrell-Herrero, Ferran & Bustinza, Oscar F. & Opazo-Basaez, Marco, 2021. "Information technologies and product-service innovation: The moderating role of service R&D team structure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 673-687.
    3. Jiahe Chen & Yu-Wei Chang, 2025. "How retailers launch IT-based strategies to win new and loyal customers in O2O commerce," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-27, December.
    4. Dehghani, Milad & William Kennedy, Ryan & Mashatan, Atefeh & Rese, Alexandra & Karavidas, Dionysios, 2022. "High interest, low adoption. A mixed-method investigation into the factors influencing organisational adoption of blockchain technology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 393-411.
    5. Queiroz, Maciel M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2019. "Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 70-82.
    6. Kim, Yusoon & Choi, Thomas Y., 2021. "Supplier relationship strategies and outcome dualities: An empirical study of embeddedness perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    7. Chowdhury, Md Maruf H. & Quaddus, Mohammed, 2017. "Supply chain resilience: Conceptualization and scale development using dynamic capability theory," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 185-204.
    8. Kumar Saurabh & Parijat Upadhyay & Neelam Rani, 2025. "Towards Blockchain Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAO) Design," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 659-681, April.
    9. Changwei Pang & Qiong Wang, 2024. "How Digital Transformation Promotes Disruptive Innovation? Evidence from Chinese Entrepreneurial Firms," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 7788-7818, June.
    10. Saghiri, Soroosh S. & Barnes, Stuart J., 2016. "Supplier flexibility and postponement implementation: An empirical analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 170-183.
    11. Schniederjans, Dara G., 2017. "Adoption of 3D-printing technologies in manufacturing: A survey analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PA), pages 287-298.
    12. Haris Krijestorac & Rajiv Garg & Prabhudev Konana, 2021. "Decisions Under the Illusion of Objectivity: Digital Embeddedness and B2B Purchasing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(7), pages 2232-2251, July.
    13. Boon-itt, Sakun & Wong, Chee Yew & Wong, Christina W.Y., 2017. "Service supply chain management process capabilities: Measurement development," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 1-11.
    14. Sullivan, Yulia & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2024. "Artificial intelligence and adaptive response to market changes: A strategy to enhance firm performance and innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    15. Hong, Seock-Jin & Kim, Woongyi & Hiatt, Brian, 2025. "Examining airport agility at air cargo hub airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    16. Adams, Peter & Farrell, Mark & Dalgarno, Barney & Oczkowski, Edward, 2017. "Household Adoption of Technology: The Case of High-Speed Broadband Adoption in Australia," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 37-47.
    17. Swapan Kumar Saha & Guijun Zhuang & Sihan Li, 2020. "Will Consumers Pay More for Efficient Delivery? An Empirical Study of What Affects E-Customers’ Satisfaction and Willingness to Pay on Online Shopping in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, February.
    18. Mina Nasiri & Minna Saunila & Juhani Ukko & Tero Rantala & Hannu Rantanen, 2023. "Shaping Digital Innovation Via Digital-related Capabilities," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 1063-1080, June.
    19. Soren, Anup Anurag & Chakraborty, Shibashish, 2024. "Adoption, satisfaction, trust, and commitment of over-the-top platforms: An integrated approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    20. Hsieh, Pi-Jung, 2021. "Understanding medical consumers’ intentions to switch from cash payment to medical mobile payment: A perspective of technology migration," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:76:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s41471-023-00176-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.