IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sjobre/v65y2013i4d10.1007_bf03373716.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nutzengestützte Unternehmensbewertung: Ein Abriss der jüngeren Literatur

Author

Listed:
  • Josef Schosser

    (Universität Passau)

  • Markus Grottke

    (Universität Passau)

Abstract

Zusammenfassung Die sog. ßSicherheitsäquivalentmethode“ gilt als klassisches Verfahren nutzengestützter Bewertung. Sie bestimmt den Wert eines Stroms unsicherer Zahlungen, indem periodenspezifische Sicherheitsäquivalente gebildet und mit Hilfe des risikofreien Zinssatzes in einer Größe verdichtet werden. Im Anschluss an Kürsten (zfbf, 54. Jg., S. 128–144, 2002) kamen Zweifel an der theoretischen Fundierung dieser Vorgehensweise auf. Es entwickelte sich eine umfangreiche Diskussion, die zu klären versuchte, unter welchen Bedingungen die Sicherheitsäquivalentmethode eingesetzt werden kann und wie alternative nutzengestützte Kalküle aussehen könnten. Vorliegender Beitrag liefert einen systematischen überblick über die hierbei entstandenen Arbeiten, wobei sowohl Ansätze innerhalb als auch außerhalb des Rahmens der Erwartungsnutzentheorie besprochen werden. Dabei wird die überragende Bedeutung der Annahmen hinsichtlich der Reichhaltigkeit des Kapitalmarkts deutlich. Besondere Beachtung zollt der Beitrag den–in der deutschen Literatur weitgehend außer Acht gelassenen–Verbindungen zum angelsächsischen Schrifttum. Im Vergleich der Literaturstränge zeigen sich Analogien, aber auch gegenseitige Ergänzungen.

Suggested Citation

  • Josef Schosser & Markus Grottke, 2013. "Nutzengestützte Unternehmensbewertung: Ein Abriss der jüngeren Literatur," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 65(4), pages 306-341, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:65:y:2013:i:4:d:10.1007_bf03373716
    DOI: 10.1007/BF03373716
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF03373716
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF03373716?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bernhard Schwetzler, 2000. "Unternehmensbewertung unter Unsicherheit — Sicherheitsäquivalent- oder Risikozuschlagsmethode?," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 52(5), pages 469-486, August.
    2. Peter C. Fishburn, 1965. "Independence in Utility Theory with Whole Product Sets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 28-45, February.
    3. Hakansson, Nils H., 1969. "On the Dividend Capitalization Model Under Uncertainty," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(1), pages 65-87, March.
    4. Stapleton, R C & Subrahmanyam, Marti G, 1978. "A Multiperiod Equilibrium Asset Pricing Model," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 46(5), pages 1077-1096, September.
    5. Breeden, Douglas T., 1979. "An intertemporal asset pricing model with stochastic consumption and investment opportunities," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 265-296, September.
    6. Keeney,Ralph L. & Raiffa,Howard, 1993. "Decisions with Multiple Objectives," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521438834.
    7. Harald Dyckhoff, 2007. "Quasilineare Mittel von Periodensicherheitswerten als intertemporale Nutzenfunktionen," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 59(8), pages 982-1001, December.
    8. James E. Smith, 1998. "Evaluating Income Streams: A Decision Analysis Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(12-Part-1), pages 1690-1708, December.
    9. Xin Chen & Melvyn Sim & David Simchi-Levi & Peng Sun, 2007. "Risk Aversion in Inventory Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(5), pages 828-842, October.
    10. Manel Baucells & Rakesh Sarin, 2007. "Evaluating Time Streams of Income: Discounting What?," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 63(2), pages 95-120, September.
    11. Gregor Dorfleitner & Michael Krapp, 2007. "On multiattributive risk aversion: some clarifying results," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 47-63, April.
    12. James E. Smith & Robert F. Nau, 1995. "Valuing Risky Projects: Option Pricing Theory and Decision Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(5), pages 795-816, May.
    13. George Yungchih Wang, 2012. "Evaluating an Investment Project in an Incomplete Market," The Review of Finance and Banking, Academia de Studii Economice din Bucuresti, Romania / Facultatea de Finante, Asigurari, Banci si Burse de Valori / Catedra de Finante, vol. 4(1), pages 055-073, June.
    14. Gordon Hazen, 2009. "An Extension of the Internal Rate of Return to Stochastic Cash Flows," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(6), pages 1030-1034, June.
    15. Sunil Dutta & Xiao‐jun Zhang, 2002. "Revenue Recognition in a Multiperiod Agency Setting," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 67-83, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. James E. Smith & Canan Ulu, 2017. "Risk Aversion, Information Acquisition, and Technology Adoption," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(4), pages 1011-1028, August.
    2. Schosser, Josef, 2019. "Consistency between principal and agent with differing time horizons: Computing incentives under risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 1113-1123.
    3. Lijian Lu & Xiaoming Yan, 2016. "Capacity investment decisions under risk aversion," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(3), pages 218-235, April.
    4. Wolfgang Kürsten, 2002. "„Unternehmensbewertung unter Unsicherheit“, oder: Theoriedefizit einer künstlichen Diskussion über Sicherheitsäquivalent- und Risikozuschlagsmethode," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 128-144, March.
    5. David J Johnstone, 2023. "Capital budgeting and Kelly betting," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 48(3), pages 625-651, August.
    6. Manel Baucells & Emanuele Borgonovo, 2013. "Invariant Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(11), pages 2536-2549, November.
    7. Schosser, Josef, 2016. "Time (in)consistency and real options: Much ado about nothing?," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 77-84.
    8. Robin Gregory & Ralph L. Keeney, 2017. "A Practical Approach to Address Uncertainty in Stakeholder Deliberations," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(3), pages 487-501, March.
    9. Carol Alexander & Xi Chen, 2021. "Model risk in real option valuation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 299(1), pages 1025-1056, April.
    10. Janne Gustafsson, 2020. "Valuation of Research and Development Projects Using Buying and Selling Prices: Generalized Definitions," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 154-168, June.
    11. Duffie, Darrell, 2003. "Intertemporal asset pricing theory," Handbook of the Economics of Finance, in: G.M. Constantinides & M. Harris & R. M. Stulz (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Finance, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 11, pages 639-742, Elsevier.
    12. Lucy Gongtao Chen & Daniel Zhuoyu Long & Melvyn Sim, 2015. "On Dynamic Decision Making to Meet Consumption Targets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(5), pages 1117-1130, October.
    13. Ralph L. Keeney, 2007. "Modeling Values for Anti‐Terrorism Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 585-596, June.
    14. Carlo Alberto Magni, 2010. "Average Internal Rate of Return and investment decisions: A new perspective," Centro Studi di Banca e Finanza (CEFIN) (Center for Studies in Banking and Finance) 0021, Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Dipartimento di Economia "Marco Biagi".
    15. James S. Dyer & James E. Smith, 2021. "Innovations in the Science and Practice of Decision Analysis: The Role of Management Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5364-5378, September.
    16. Panos Kouvelis & Rong Li & Qing Ding, 2013. "Managing Storable Commodity Risks: The Role of Inventory and Financial Hedge," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 507-521, July.
    17. Jafarizadeh, Babak, 2012. "Information acquisition as an American option," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 807-816.
    18. Gordon Hazen, 2009. "An Extension of the Internal Rate of Return to Stochastic Cash Flows," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(6), pages 1030-1034, June.
    19. Günter Bamberg & Michael Krapp, 2016. "Is time consistency compatible with risk aversion?," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 195-211, March.
    20. Diwakar Gupta & Mili Mehrotra & Xiaoxu Tang, 2021. "Gainsharing Contracts for CMS’ Episode‐Based Payment Models," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(5), pages 1290-1312, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Certainty equivalent; Firm valuation; Utility-based valuation; Utility function;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • D90 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - General
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:65:y:2013:i:4:d:10.1007_bf03373716. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.