IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sjobre/v52y2000i8d10.1007_bf03372635.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ein fast problemloses DCF-Verfahren zur Unternehmensbewertung

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Schildbach

    (Universität Passau)

Abstract

Summary Discounted Cash Flow-Methods of Corporate Valuation have severe disadvantages. Outside special cases of perpetual annuities actual formulas cause never ending circles of calculation. Up to now the problems are solved either by multistep rollback-methods, often on a basis of systematic trial and improvement, or by problematic assumptions or by delicate curtailments of Financial Policy (constant debt-equity-ratio). This paper presents a new formula which is free from the formal problems. Of course this is not a solution to the material problems of Corporate Valuation.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Schildbach, 2000. "Ein fast problemloses DCF-Verfahren zur Unternehmensbewertung," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 52(8), pages 707-723, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:52:y:2000:i:8:d:10.1007_bf03372635
    DOI: 10.1007/BF03372635
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF03372635
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF03372635?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miles, James A. & Ezzell, John R., 1980. "The Weighted Average Cost of Capital, Perfect Capital Markets, and Project Life: A Clarification," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(3), pages 719-730, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sven Husmann & Lutz Kruschwitz & Andreas Löffler, 2001. "Über einige Probleme mit DCF-Verfahren," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 277-282, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ralf Diedrich & Stefan Dierkes & Hans-Christian Gröger, 2022. "A note on the cost of capital with fixed payout ratios," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 1559-1575, November.
    2. Fischer, Max & Krause, Marko & Lahmann, Alexander & Stimper, Franziska, 2022. "Firm valuation with state dependent COD taxation," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 550-561.
    3. Marko Volker Krause, 2019. "De and re-levering betas with risky debt," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(2), pages 703-720, December.
    4. Stewart C. Myers & Richard S. Ruback, 1987. "Discounting Rules for Risky Assets," NBER Working Papers 2219, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Nyborg, Kjell & Molnár, Peter, 2011. "Tax-Adjusted Discount Rates: A General Formula under Constant Leverage Ratios," CEPR Discussion Papers 8330, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    6. James A. Miles & John R. Ezzell & Premal P. Vora, 2018. "Revisiting the standard lease valuation model: new results," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 42(2), pages 409-420, April.
    7. Kruschwitz, Lutz & Löffler, Andreas, 2015. "Marginal tax rates under asymmetric taxation," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 191, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    8. Magni, Carlo Alberto & Marchioni, Andrea, 2020. "Average rates of return, working capital, and NPV-consistency in project appraisal: A sensitivity analysis approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    9. Fischer, Marcel & Jensen, Bjarne Astrup, 2017. "The debt tax shield, economic growth and inequality," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 219, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    10. Fernandez, Pablo, 2003. "Levered and unlevered Beta," IESE Research Papers D/488, IESE Business School.
    11. André Farber & Roland Gillet & Ariane Szafarz, 2005. "A general formula for the WACC," Working Papers CEB 05-012.RS, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    12. Peter Nippel & Felix Streitferdt, 2003. "Unternehmensbewertung mit dem WACC-Verfahren: Steuern, Wachstum und Teilausschüttung," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 401-422, June.
    13. Roland Gillet & Ariane Szafarz & André Farber, 2007. "A general formula for the WACC : A Reply," Post-Print hal-03716097, HAL.
    14. David Johnstone & Steve Tulig, 2022. "Hamada’s equation and the beta of debt under CAPM," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(2), pages 2385-2399, June.
    15. Keef, Stephen P & Khaled, Mohammed S & Roush, Melvin L, 2011. "A note resolving the debate on “The weighted average cost of capital is not quite rightâ€," Working Paper Series 2003, Victoria University of Wellington, School of Economics and Finance.
    16. H. Qi & Y. A. Xie, 2016. "Cost of capital: spot rate or forward rate?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(40), pages 3804-3811, August.
    17. Stewart C. Myers & James A. Read, Jr., 2012. "Real Options, Taxes and Financial Leverage," NBER Working Papers 18148, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Fernandez, Pablo, 2005. "Financial literature about discounted cash flow valuation," IESE Research Papers D/606, IESE Business School.
    19. Laurence Booth, 2007. "Capital Cash Flows, APV and Valuation," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 13(1), pages 29-48, January.
    20. Jens Dick‐Nielsen & Jacob Gyntelberg & Christoffer Thimsen, 2022. "The Cost of Capital for Banks: Evidence from Analyst Earnings Forecasts," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 77(5), pages 2577-2611, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:52:y:2000:i:8:d:10.1007_bf03372635. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.