IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sjobre/v50y1998i7d10.1007_bf03371529.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Der vereinfachte Bezugsrechtsausschluß — eine ökonomische Analyse

Author

Listed:
  • Stefan Rammert

    (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München)

Abstract

Summary In Germany the rights issue is traditionally the most common method for issuing stock. Since 1994 German Joint stock corporations are allowed to issue stock through a cash offering if the issue price is not essentially below the stock price and the issue doesn’t exceed ten percent of the existing nominal capital. The intention of the legalization of the cash offering is to improve the flexibility of corporations’ financing policy and to lower their capital costs. In this article the effects of a cash offering on shareholder’s wealth are analysed in comparison to the traditional rights offering. The analysis is based on three criteria, protection against dilution of Stocks, incentive effects on the management’s investment and financing decisions and transaction costs. It is shown that most of the intended advantages of the cash offering have to be seen critically. Among other things inefficient investment and financing decisions can result from a cash offering. Further, the new regulations for stock issues may have a negative impact on the Position of minority shareholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefan Rammert, 1998. "Der vereinfachte Bezugsrechtsausschluß — eine ökonomische Analyse," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 50(7), pages 703-724, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:50:y:1998:i:7:d:10.1007_bf03371529
    DOI: 10.1007/BF03371529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF03371529
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF03371529?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Myers, Stewart C. & Majluf, Nicholas S., 1984. "Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 187-221, June.
    2. Hess, Alan C & Bhagat, Sanjai, 1986. "Size Effects of Seasoned Stock Issues: Empirical Evidence," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 59(4), pages 567-584, October.
    3. Carter, Richard B & Manaster, Steven, 1990. "Initial Public Offerings and Underwriter Reputation," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 45(4), pages 1045-1067, September.
    4. Kübler Friedrich, 1993. "Sind zwingende Bezugsrechte wirtschaftlich sinnvoll?," Zeitschrift für Bankrecht und Bankwirtschaft (ZBB) / Journal of Banking Law and Banking (JBB), RWS Verlag, vol. 5(1), pages 1-7, March.
    5. Rock, Kevin, 1986. "Why new issues are underpriced," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1-2), pages 187-212.
    6. Allen, Franklin & Faulhaber, Gerald R., 1989. "Signalling by underpricing in the IPO market," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 303-323, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mayur, Manas & Kumar, Manoj, 2006. "An Empirical Investigation of Going Public Decision of Indian Companies," MPRA Paper 1801, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Wolfgang Bessler & Stefan Thies, 2006. "Initial Public Offerings, Subsequent Seasoned Equity Offerings, and Long-Run Performance: Evidence from IPOs in Germany," Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, Pepperdine University, Graziadio School of Business and Management, vol. 11(3), pages 1-37, Fall.
    3. Liu, Jia & Lister, Roger & Pang, Dong, 2013. "Corporate evolution following initial public offerings in China: A life-course approach," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 1-20.
    4. Zhang, Feng, 2012. "Information precision and IPO pricing," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 331-348.
    5. Patrick Sentis, 2009. "Merging Activity as a Rational Explanation for the Long-Run Underperformance of IPO," Multinational Finance Journal, Multinational Finance Journal, vol. 13(1-2), pages 75-102, March-Jun.
    6. Harjeet S. Bhabra & Richard H. Pettway, 2003. "IPO Prospectus Information and Subsequent Performance," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 38(3), pages 369-397, August.
    7. Yin‐Hua Yeh & Pei‐Gi Shu & Re‐Jin Guo, 2008. "Ownership Structure and IPO Valuation—Evidence from Taiwan," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 37(1), pages 141-161, March.
    8. Alexander Ljungqvist & William J. Wilhelm, 2003. "IPO Pricing in the Dot‐com Bubble," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 58(2), pages 723-752, April.
    9. Cho, Jaemin & Lee, Jaeho, 2013. "The venture capital certification role in R&D: Evidence from IPO underpricing in Korea," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 83-108.
    10. Vong, Anna P.I. & Trigueiros, Duarte, 2010. "The short-run price performance of initial public offerings in Hong Kong: New evidence," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 253-261.
    11. Elizabeth Demers & Philip Joos, 2007. "IPO Failure Risk," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 333-371, May.
    12. Jay R. Ritter & Ivo Welch, 2002. "A Review of IPO Activity, Pricing, and Allocations," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 57(4), pages 1795-1828, August.
    13. Mingsheng Li & Thomas H. McInish & Udomsak Wongchoti, 2005. "Asymmetric Information in the IPO Aftermarket," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 40(2), pages 131-153, May.
    14. Agoraki, Maria-Eleni K. & Gounopoulos, Dimitrios & Kouretas, Georgios P., 2022. "U.S. banks’ IPOs and political money contributions," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    15. Oehler, Andreas & Rummer, Marco & Smith, Peter N., 2004. "IPO Pricing and the Relative Importance of Investor Sentiment: Evidence from Germany," Discussion Papers 26, University of Bamberg, Chair of Finance.
    16. Bill Dimovski & Christopher Ratcliffe & Monica Keneley, 2017. "Another piece of the puzzle: REIT IPO underpricing after the financial crisis," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(3), pages 264-276, April.
    17. Dereeper, Sebastien & Mashwani, Asad Iqbal, 2018. "Equity carve-outs, divergence of beliefs and analysts’ following," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 58-67.
    18. Re‐Jin Guo & Baruch Lev & Charles Shi, 2006. "Explaining the Short‐ and Long‐Term IPO Anomalies in the US by R&D," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3‐4), pages 550-579, April.
    19. Attiya Yasmin Javid & Henna Malik, 2016. "Performance and capital structure of IPOs in Pakistan from 2000 to 2015," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 1-19, December.
    20. Anna Vong & N. Zhao, 2008. "An examination of IPO underpricing in the growth enterprise market of Hong Kong," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(19), pages 1539-1547.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:50:y:1998:i:7:d:10.1007_bf03371529. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.