IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/rvmgts/v18y2024i6d10.1007_s11846-023-00669-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Escaping generational conflict: using gamification to examine intergenerational communication & problem-solving

Author

Listed:
  • Melanie B. Richards

    (East Tennessee State University)

  • Karin L. Becker

    (United States Air Force Academy USAFA)

  • Jessica Stollings-Holder

    (ReGenerations)

Abstract

In a global, interconnected, multi-generational, and multi-cultural workforce, it is increasingly important to understand what conditions foster success on diverse teams. This study seeks to understand how generational diversity impacts team performance. While there are growing bodies of research on the perceived challenges and opportunities of five generations working together in the workforce, few studies have tested, experientially, how generational diversity impacts results. To examine this relationship, an escape room was set up in a utility company in the Southeastern United States. Ten percent of the company’s workforce (n=60 employees) were grouped into same generation and intergenerational teams to play the game. Half of the intergenerational teams received a 30-minute primer on generational diversity. The simulation measured problem solving capabilities among same generation and intergenerational teams. Findings indicate intergenerational teams, with and without diversity training, were less successful, while same generation teams were more successful overall in problem solving. The 30-minute primer did not make an impact on intergenerational team performance outcomes. This research identifies characteristics of unsuccessful team problem solving including communication styles and levels of engagement. It also makes recommendations for how diversity training, reverse mentoring, and gamification may foster communication and collaboration in generationally diverse teams.

Suggested Citation

  • Melanie B. Richards & Karin L. Becker & Jessica Stollings-Holder, 2024. "Escaping generational conflict: using gamification to examine intergenerational communication & problem-solving," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 1597-1616, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:rvmgts:v:18:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s11846-023-00669-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s11846-023-00669-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11846-023-00669-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11846-023-00669-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Koczanski & Harvey S. Rosen, 2019. "Are Millennials Really So Selfish? Preliminary Evidence from the Philanthropy Panel Study," NBER Working Papers 25813, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Stewart, Jeanine S. & Oliver, Elizabeth Goad & Cravens, Karen S. & Oishi, Shigehiro, 2017. "Managing millennials: Embracing generational differences," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 45-54.
    3. Maureen Snow Andrade & Jonathan H. Westover, 2018. "Generational differences in work quality characteristics and job satisfaction," Evidence-based HRM, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(3), pages 287-304, August.
    4. Harvey S. Rosen & Peter Koczanski, 2019. "Are Millennials Really So Selfish? Preliminary Evidence from the Philanthropy Panel Study," Working Papers 254, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Center for Economic Policy Studies..
    5. Robson, Karen & Plangger, Kirk & Kietzmann, Jan H. & McCarthy, Ian & Pitt, Leyland, 2016. "Game on: Engaging customers and employees through gamification," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 29-36.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jarvis, Stephen, 2022. "How generational are generational trends in in vehicle ownership and use?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113646, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Gabrielova, Karina & Buchko, Aaron A., 2021. "Here comes Generation Z: Millennials as managers," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 489-499.
    3. Qi, Ji (Miracle) & Wang, Sijun & Lindsey Hall, Kristina K., 2023. "Bridging employee engagement and customer engagement in a service context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    4. Zhuoyao Cui & Haochen Yang, 2023. "From Game Elements to Active Learning Intentions: Exploring the Driving Factors in Digital Learning Platforms," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    5. Behl, Abhishek & Jayawardena, Nirma & Ishizaka, Alessio & Gupta, Manish & Shankar, Amit, 2022. "Gamification and gigification: A multidimensional theoretical approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1378-1393.
    6. Feng, Wenting & Tu, Rungting & Hsieh, Peishan, 2020. "Can gamification increases consumers’ engagement in fitness apps? The moderating role of commensurability of the game elements," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    7. Barbara Burgess-Wilkerson & Clovia Hamilton & Chlotia Garrison & Keith Robbins, 2019. "Preparing millennials as digital citizens and socially and environmentally responsible business professionals in a socially irresponsible climate," Papers 1901.06609, arXiv.org.
    8. Hokey Min, 2021. "Exploring Omni-Channels for Customer-Centric e-Tailing," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-10, May.
    9. Xi, Nannan & Hamari, Juho, 2020. "Does gamification affect brand engagement and equity? A study in online brand communities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 449-460.
    10. Inmaculada Buendía-Martínez & Carolina Hidalgo-López & Eric Brat, 2020. "Are Cooperatives an Employment Option? A Job Preference Study of Millennial University Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-32, September.
    11. Fernando Rey Castillo-Villar & Judith Cavazos-Arroyo, 2020. "Social Representations of “Rounding Up” as a Cause-Related Marketing Practice: A Study of Mexican Millennials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-12, June.
    12. Poncin, Ingrid & Garnier, Marion & Ben Mimoun, Mohammed Slim & Leclercq, Thomas, 2017. "Smart technologies and shopping experience: Are gamification interfaces effective? The case of the Smartstore," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 320-331.
    13. Andrea Stevenson Thorpe & Stephen Roper, 2019. "The Ethics of Gamification in a Marketing Context," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(2), pages 597-609, March.
    14. Zhou, Fei & Lin, Youhai & Mou, Jian & Cohen, Jason & Chen, Sihua, 2023. "Understanding the dark side of gamified interactions on short-form video platforms: Through a lens of expectations violations theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PB).
    15. Oksana S. Karashchuk & Elena A. Mayorova & Alexander F. Nikishin & Olena V. Kornilova, 2020. "The Method for Determining Time-Generation Range," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, October.
    16. Maria Cotofan & Lea Cassar & Robert Dur & Stephan Meier, 2023. "Macroeconomic Conditions When Young Shape Job Preferences for Life," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 105(2), pages 467-473, March.
    17. João M. Lopes & Sofia Gomes & Ivo Rodrigues, 2024. "Playing the gamification and co-creation game: a bibliometric literature review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(1), pages 353-376, February.
    18. Zollo, Lamberto & Filieri, Raffaele & Rialti, Riccardo & Yoon, Sukki, 2020. "Unpacking the relationship between social media marketing and brand equity: The mediating role of consumers’ benefits and experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 256-267.
    19. Sharma, Wamika & Lim, Weng Marc & Kumar, Satish & Verma, Aastha & Kumra, Rajeev, 2024. "Game on! A state-of-the-art overview of doing business with gamification," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    20. Khan, Imran, 2022. "Do brands’ social media marketing activities matter? A moderation analysis," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:rvmgts:v:18:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s11846-023-00669-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.