IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/reihed/v58y2017i2d10.1007_s11162-016-9423-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Racial Inequality in Critical Thinking Skills: The Role of Academic and Diversity Experiences

Author

Listed:
  • Josipa Roksa

    () (University of Virginia)

  • Teniell L. Trolian

    () (University at Albany, State University of New York)

  • Ernest T. Pascarella

    () (University of Iowa)

  • Cindy A. Kilgo

    () (University of Alabama)

  • Charles Blaich

    () (Wabash College)

  • Kathleen S. Wise

    () (Wabash College)

Abstract

Abstract While racial inequalities in college entry and completion are well documented, much less is known about racial disparities in the development of general collegiate skills, such as critical thinking. Using data from the Wabash National Study of Liberal Arts Education, we find substantial inequality in the development of critical thinking skills over four years of college between African American and White students. The results indicate that these inequities are not related to students’ academic experiences in college but are substantially related to their experiences with diversity. These findings have important implications for understanding racial inequality in higher education and considering strategies for addressing observed disparities.

Suggested Citation

  • Josipa Roksa & Teniell L. Trolian & Ernest T. Pascarella & Cindy A. Kilgo & Charles Blaich & Kathleen S. Wise, 2017. "Racial Inequality in Critical Thinking Skills: The Role of Academic and Diversity Experiences," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 58(2), pages 119-140, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:reihed:v:58:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s11162-016-9423-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s11162-016-9423-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11162-016-9423-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:reihed:v:58:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s11162-016-9423-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Rebekah McClure). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.