IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/reaccs/v2y1997i1d10.1023_a1018325711417.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Accuracy of Proportional Cost Models: Evidence from Hospital Service Departments

Author

Listed:
  • Eric Noreen

    (INSEAD)

  • Naomi Soderstrom

    (INSEAD)

Abstract

Using data from hospitals in the state of Washington, we examine the time-series behavior of overhead costs. We find that more accurate predictions of changes in costs are usually generated by assuming a cost will not change at all (except for inflation) than by assuming that the cost will change in proportion to changes in activity. We also find that nearly all of the effect of a change in activity on costs appears to occur in the same year as the change in activity. Finally, using a multi-period regression model we find that the proportion of variable costs in the hospital overhead accounts is apparently very modest. These results suggest that costing systems, such as activity-based costing, that assume costs are proportional to activity, will grossly overstate relevant (i.e., incremental) overhead costs for decision-making and performance evaluation purposes.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric Noreen & Naomi Soderstrom, 1997. "The Accuracy of Proportional Cost Models: Evidence from Hospital Service Departments," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 89-114, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:2:y:1997:i:1:d:10.1023_a:1018325711417
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1018325711417
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1018325711417
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1018325711417?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:2:y:1997:i:1:d:10.1023_a:1018325711417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.