IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/reaccs/v28y2023i4d10.1007_s11142-022-09680-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Double trouble? IRS’s attention to financial accounting restatements

Author

Listed:
  • Zackery D. Fox

    (Texas A&M University)

  • Ryan Wilson

    (University of Oregon)

Abstract

We examine whether the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) uses public information to obtain qualitative signals regarding the quality of firms’ financial information or management integrity. Using the procurement of public information as a proxy for IRS attention, we test whether public signals of poor information quality (restatements) lead to an increase in IRS attention. To begin, we document that the IRS is both more likely and quicker to acquire public filings announcing a restatement than any other filing of the firm. Furthermore, we examine instances in which the IRS is more likely to learn of a restatement and find an increase in attention around both press releases and media coverage of the restatement. Next we examine the implications of increased IRS attention. Employing path analysis, we find that IRS attention is associated with both higher levels of future tax settlements and a greater likelihood of the mention of a tax audit. Overall our results are consistent with the IRS responding to signals of poor information quality or management integrity as if financial misreporting and tax reporting are related.

Suggested Citation

  • Zackery D. Fox & Ryan Wilson, 2023. "Double trouble? IRS’s attention to financial accounting restatements," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 2002-2038, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:28:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s11142-022-09680-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11142-022-09680-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11142-022-09680-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11142-022-09680-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:28:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s11142-022-09680-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.