IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/reaccs/v17y2012i4d10.1007_s11142-012-9185-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A re-examination of analysts’ superiority over time-series forecasts of annual earnings

Author

Listed:
  • Mark T. Bradshaw

    (Boston College)

  • Michael S. Drake

    (Brigham Young University)

  • James N. Myers

    (University of Arkansas)

  • Linda A. Myers

    (University of Arkansas)

Abstract

We re-examine the widely held belief that analysts’ earnings per share (EPS) forecasts are superior to random walk (RW) time-series forecasts. We investigate whether analysts’ annual EPS forecasts are superior, and if so, under what conditions. Simple RW EPS forecasts are more accurate than analysts’ forecasts over longer horizons, for smaller or younger firms, and when analysts forecast negative or large changes in EPS. We also compare the accuracy of a third forecast of longer-term earnings based on a naïve extrapolation of analysts’ 1-year-ahead forecasts. Surprisingly, this naïve extrapolation provides the most accurate estimate of long-term (2- and 3-year-ahead) earnings. These findings recharacterize prior generalizations about the superiority of analysts’ forecasts and suggest that they are incomplete, misleading, or both. Moreover, in certain settings, researchers can rely on forecasts other than these explicit forecasts.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark T. Bradshaw & Michael S. Drake & James N. Myers & Linda A. Myers, 2012. "A re-examination of analysts’ superiority over time-series forecasts of annual earnings," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 944-968, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:17:y:2012:i:4:d:10.1007_s11142-012-9185-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11142-012-9185-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11142-012-9185-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11142-012-9185-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G17 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Financial Forecasting and Simulation
    • M40 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - General
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:17:y:2012:i:4:d:10.1007_s11142-012-9185-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.