IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v58y2024i3d10.1007_s11135-023-01733-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The inaccuracy of data from online surveys: A cautionary analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer P. Agans

    (The Pennsylvania State University)

  • Serena A. Schade

    (The Pennsylvania State University)

  • Steven R. Hanna

    (The Pennsylvania State University)

  • Shou-Chun Chiang

    (The Pennsylvania State University)

  • Kimia Shirzad

    (The Pennsylvania State University)

  • Sunhye Bai

    (The Pennsylvania State University)

Abstract

Online recruitment methods for survey-based studies have become increasingly common in social science research. However, they are susceptible to a high rate of participation by fraudulent research subjects. The current study identified fraudulent (i.e., “fake”) participants in an online research study of parents of 13 to 18-year-old adolescents, and compared demographic, anthropometric, and subjective health data between “fake” (N = 1084) and “real” (N = 197) participants. Of 1,281 subjects who started the eligibility survey, 84.6% were coded as “fake.” “Fake” participants were less diverse in race/ethnicity and more diverse in gender. Their depression symptoms were inflated, but ratings of perceived health were comparable to “real” participants. Well-established correlations, such as that between BMI and perceived health, were not replicated with “fake” participants. Online surveys are highly vulnerable to fraudulent research subjects whose participation compromises the validity and interpretability of results. The discussion provides a guide and recommendations for improving data quality in online survey research.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer P. Agans & Serena A. Schade & Steven R. Hanna & Shou-Chun Chiang & Kimia Shirzad & Sunhye Bai, 2024. "The inaccuracy of data from online surveys: A cautionary analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 2065-2086, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:58:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11135-023-01733-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-023-01733-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-023-01733-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-023-01733-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:58:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11135-023-01733-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.