IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stabio/v16y2024i2d10.1007_s12561-023-09410-9.html

Some searches may not work properly. We apologize for the inconvenience.

   My bibliography  Save this article

Applying Latent Variable Models to Estimate Cumulative Exposure Burden to Chemical Mixtures and Identify Latent Exposure Subgroups: A Critical Review and Future Directions

Author

Listed:
  • Shelley H. Liu

    (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai)

  • Yitong Chen

    (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai)

  • Jordan R. Kuiper

    (The George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health)

  • Emily Ho

    (Northwestern University)

  • Jessie P. Buckley

    (John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health)

  • Leah Feuerstahler

    (Fordham University)

Abstract

Environmental mixtures, which reflect joint exposure to multiple environmental agents, are a major focus of environmental health and risk assessment research. Advancements in latent variable modeling and psychometrics can be used to address contemporary questions in environmental mixtures research. In particular, latent variable models can quantify an individual’s cumulative exposure burden to mixtures and identify hidden subpopulations with distinct exposure patterns. Here, we first provide a review of measurement approaches from the psychometrics field, including structural equation modeling and latent class/profile analysis, and discuss their prior environmental epidemiologic applications. Then, we discuss additional, underutilized opportunities to leverage the strengths of psychometric approaches. This includes using item response theory to create a common scale for comparing exposure burden scores across studies; facilitating data harmonization through the use of anchors. We also discuss studying fairness or appropriateness of measurement models to quantify exposure burden across diverse populations, through the use of mixture item response theory and through evaluation of measurement invariance and differential item functioning. Multi-dimensional models to quantify correlated exposure burden sub-scores, and methods to adjust for imprecision of chemical exposure data, are also discussed. We show that there is great potential to address pressing environmental epidemiology and exposure science questions using latent variable methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Shelley H. Liu & Yitong Chen & Jordan R. Kuiper & Emily Ho & Jessie P. Buckley & Leah Feuerstahler, 2024. "Applying Latent Variable Models to Estimate Cumulative Exposure Burden to Chemical Mixtures and Identify Latent Exposure Subgroups: A Critical Review and Future Directions," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 16(2), pages 482-502, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:stabio:v:16:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s12561-023-09410-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s12561-023-09410-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12561-023-09410-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12561-023-09410-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yiu-Fai Yung & David Thissen & Lori McLeod, 1999. "On the relationship between the higher-order factor model and the hierarchical factor model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 64(2), pages 113-128, June.
    2. Shelley H. Liu & Jennifer F. Bobb & Birgit Claus Henn & Lourdes Schnaas & Martha M. Tellez‐Rojo & Chris Gennings & Manish Arora & Robert O. Wright & Brent A. Coull & Matt P. Wand, 2018. "Modeling the health effects of time‐varying complex environmental mixtures: Mean field variational Bayes for lagged kernel machine regression," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(4), June.
    3. William Meredith, 1993. "Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 58(4), pages 525-543, December.
    4. Sandip Sinharay, 2017. "Some Remarks on Applications of Tests for Detecting A Change Point to Psychometric Problems," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(4), pages 1149-1161, December.
    5. Bonnie E. Shook-Sa & Ding-Geng Chen & Haibo Zhou, 2017. "Using Structural Equation Modeling to Assess the Links between Tobacco Smoke Exposure, Volatile Organic Compounds, and Respiratory Function for Adolescents Aged 6 to 18 in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-12, September.
    6. Yang, Chih-Chien, 2006. "Evaluating latent class analysis models in qualitative phenotype identification," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(4), pages 1090-1104, February.
    7. Anders Skrondal & Sophia Rabe‐Hesketh, 2007. "Latent Variable Modelling: A Survey," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 34(4), pages 712-745, December.
    8. Bolck, Annabel & Croon, Marcel & Hagenaars, Jacques, 2004. "Estimating Latent Structure Models with Categorical Variables: One-Step Versus Three-Step Estimators," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 3-27, January.
    9. Beom Seuk Hwang & Zhen Chen & Germaine M. Buck Louis & Paul S. Albert, 2019. "A Bayesian multi‐dimensional couple‐based latent risk model with an application to infertility," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 75(1), pages 315-325, March.
    10. Maarten Marsman & Gunter Maris & Timo Bechger & Cees Glas, 2016. "What can we learn from Plausible Values?," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(2), pages 274-289, June.
    11. Vermunt, Jeroen K. & Magidson, Jay, 2003. "Latent class models for classification," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 41(3-4), pages 531-537, January.
    12. E. Andrés Houseman & Carmen Marsit & Margaret Karagas & Louise M. Ryan, 2007. "Penalized Item Response Theory Models: Application to Epigenetic Alterations in Bladder Cancer," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(4), pages 1269-1277, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Sung Hoo & Mokhtarian, Patricia L., 2023. "Finite mixture (or latent class) modeling in transportation: Trends, usage, potential, and future directions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 134-173.
    2. Silvia Cagnone & Cinzia Viroli, 2018. "Multivariate latent variable transition models of longitudinal mixed data: an analysis on alcohol use disorder," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(5), pages 1399-1418, November.
    3. Kano, Yutaka & Takai, Keiji, 2011. "Analysis of NMAR missing data without specifying missing-data mechanisms in a linear latent variate model," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(9), pages 1241-1255, October.
    4. Silvia Cagnone & Cinzia Viroli, 2014. "A factor mixture model for analyzing heterogeneity and cognitive structure of dementia," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 98(1), pages 1-20, January.
    5. Diyang Qu & Bowen Chen & Iris Kam-fung Liu & Chrystyna D. Kouros & Nancy Xiaonan Yu, 2023. "Variations in Adaptation Profiles Among Chinese Immigrant Mothers and Their Children: A Dyadic Latent Profile Analysis," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1397-1418, April.
    6. Grant Morgan & Mark D’Amico & Kari Hodge, 2015. "Major differences: modeling profiles of community college persisters in career clusters," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 1-20, January.
    7. Johan Oud & Manuel Voelkle, 2014. "Do missing values exist? Incomplete data handling in cross-national longitudinal studies by means of continuous time modeling," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 3271-3288, November.
    8. Sophia Rabe-Hesketh & Anders Skrondal & Andrew Pickles, 2004. "GLLAMM Manual," U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series 1160, Berkeley Electronic Press.
    9. Liat Ayalon, 2018. "Perceived Age Discrimination: A Precipitator or a Consequence of Depressive Symptoms?," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 73(5), pages 860-869.
    10. Jiwon Lee & Midam An & Yongku Kim & Jung-In Seo, 2021. "Optimal Allocation for Electric Vehicle Charging Stations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-10, September.
    11. Steven Andrew Culpepper & Herman Aguinis & Justin L. Kern & Roger Millsap, 2019. "High-Stakes Testing Case Study: A Latent Variable Approach for Assessing Measurement and Prediction Invariance," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(1), pages 285-309, March.
    12. Ihsana Sabriani Borualogo & Ferran Casas, 2023. "Bullying Victimisation and Children’s Subjective Well-being: A Comparative Study in Seven Asian Countries," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 16(1), pages 1-27, February.
    13. Alan Crane & Kevin Crotty, 2020. "How Skilled Are Security Analysts?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 75(3), pages 1629-1675, June.
    14. Wilson, Christopher J. & Bowden, Stephen C. & Byrne, Linda K. & Joshua, Nicole R. & Marx, Wolfgang & Weiss, Lawrence G., 2023. "The cross-cultural generalizability of cognitive ability measures: A systematic literature review," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    15. Janina Isabel Steinert & Lucie Dale Cluver & G. J. Melendez-Torres & Sebastian Vollmer, 2018. "One Size Fits All? The Validity of a Composite Poverty Index Across Urban and Rural Households in South Africa," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 136(1), pages 51-72, February.
    16. Paul MUKUCHA & Divaries Cosmas JARAVAZA & Forbes MAKUDZA, 2022. "Towards Gender-Based Market Segmentation: The Differential Influence of Gender on Dining Experiences in the University Cafeteria Industry," Management and Economics Review, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 7(2), pages 182-200, June.
    17. Vermunt, Jeroen K., 2007. "A hierarchical mixture model for clustering three-way data sets," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(11), pages 5368-5376, July.
    18. Jennifer Oser & Marc Hooghe & Zsuzsa Bakk & Roberto Mari, 2023. "Changing citizenship norms among adolescents, 1999-2009-2016: A two-step latent class approach with measurement equivalence testing," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(5), pages 4915-4933, October.
    19. Monica Pratesi & Claudio Ceccarelli & Stefano Menghinello, 2021. "Citizen-Generated Data and Official Statistics: an application to SDG indicators," Discussion Papers 2021/274, Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
    20. Arpino, Bruno & Varriale, Roberta, 2009. "Assessing the quality of institutions’ rankings obtained through multilevel linear regression models," MPRA Paper 19873, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stabio:v:16:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s12561-023-09410-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.