IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v49y2015i4p1485-1512.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy policy participation through networks transcending cleavage: an analysis of Japanese and German renewable energy promotion policies

Author

Listed:
  • Manuela Hartwig
  • Yohei Kobashi
  • Sae Okura
  • Leslie Tkach-Kawasaki

Abstract

Developed countries with minimal energy self-sufficiency struggle with lowering their dependence on oil and coal. Security guarantees countermeasures against global warming, and ensuring new energy sources are issues that have driven their choices between nuclear power generation and promotion of renewable energy resources in recent years. Individual nations such as Japan and Germany have been implementing various policies according to their own political and social circumstances, and often these circumstances include discussions and negotiations among diverse actors with different viewpoints and objectives. The networks formed by overcoming the cleavage between the electric power industry and the community consisting mainly of environmental organizations and left-wing political forces could also function as an additional means for environmental actors to break through the impasse formed by the political structure. However, in assessing the effectiveness of the ties that overcome this confrontation, in addition to the existence of ties that connect such communities, it is also necessary to consider whether the influence of environmental actors through intermediary networks extends to the policy formation process. This paper describes the networks involved in the renewable energy feed-in tariff system enacted in Japan after March 2011 and in Germany in the early 2000s and 2012 to investigate such influences. When comparing the energy policies of Japan and Germany, corresponding networks unifying the two communities in both countries were observed in an analysis that emphasizes the existence of ties. However, an in-depth analysis of attitude-based networks and hyperlink networks focusing on policy reveals the predominance of economic and industrial interests in Japan, as well as functional differences even within the same corresponding networks. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Manuela Hartwig & Yohei Kobashi & Sae Okura & Leslie Tkach-Kawasaki, 2015. "Energy policy participation through networks transcending cleavage: an analysis of Japanese and German renewable energy promotion policies," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 1485-1512, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:49:y:2015:i:4:p:1485-1512
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-014-0093-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11135-014-0093-9
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-014-0093-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huenteler, Joern & Schmidt, Tobias S. & Kanie, Norichika, 2012. "Japan's post-Fukushima challenge – implications from the German experience on renewable energy policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 6-11.
    2. Ikeda, Ken’ichi & Richey, Sean, 2009. "The Impact of Diversity in Informal Social Networks on Tolerance in Japan," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(3), pages 655-668, July.
    3. Jang Hyun Kim & George A. Barnett & Han Woo Park, 2010. "A hyperlink and issue network analysis of the United States Senate: A rediscovery of the Web as a relational and topical medium," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(8), pages 1598-1611, August.
    4. Jang Hyun Kim & George A. Barnett & Han Woo Park, 2010. "A hyperlink and issue network analysis of the United States Senate: A rediscovery of the Web as a relational and topical medium," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(8), pages 1598-1611, August.
    5. Han Park & Mike Thelwall, 2008. "Link analysis: Hyperlink patterns and social structure on politicians’ Web sites in South Korea," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 42(5), pages 687-697, October.
    6. Han Park, 2012. "How do social scientists use link data from search engines to understand Internet-based political and electoral communication?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 679-693, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ho Yoon & Han Park, 2014. "Strategies affecting Twitter-based networking pattern of South Korean politicians: social network analysis and exponential random graph model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 409-423, January.
    2. Frank Bakker & Iina Hellsten, 2013. "Capturing Online Presence: Hyperlinks and Semantic Networks in Activist Group Websites on Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(4), pages 807-823, December.
    3. Liwen Vaughan, 2016. "Uncovering information from social media hyperlinks: An investigation of twitter," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(5), pages 1105-1120, May.
    4. Liwen Vaughan & Esteban Romero-Frías, 2012. "Exploring Web keyword analysis as an alternative to link analysis: a multi-industry case," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 93(1), pages 217-232, October.
    5. Dehler-Holland, Joris & Schumacher, Kira & Fichtner, Wolf, 2021. "Topic Modeling Uncovers Shifts in Media Framing of the German Renewable Energy Act," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 2(1).
    6. Li, Aitong & Xu, Yuan & Shiroyama, Hideaki, 2019. "Solar lobby and energy transition in Japan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    7. Seong Cho & Han Park, 2013. "A qualitative analysis of cross-cultural new media research: SNS use in Asia and the West," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 2319-2330, June.
    8. Nam, Hoseok & Konishi, Satoshi & Nam, Ki-Woo, 2021. "Comparative analysis of decision making regarding nuclear policy after the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident: Case study in Germany and Japan," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    9. Han Woo Park, 2014. "Mapping election campaigns through negative entropy: Triple and Quadruple Helix approach to South Korea’s 2012 presidential election," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 99(1), pages 187-197, April.
    10. Aotian Song & Lin Lu & Zhizhao Liu & Man Sing Wong, 2016. "A Study of Incentive Policies for Building-Integrated Photovoltaic Technology in Hong Kong," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-21, August.
    11. T. G. Popadyuk & D. A. Kupreev, 2018. "Stimulating Innovation In Distributed Energy," Strategic decisions and risk management, Real Economy Publishing House, issue 3.
    12. Chung Joo Chung & Han Woo Park, 2012. "Web visibility of scholars in media and communication journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 93(1), pages 207-215, October.
    13. Trencher, Gregory & Healy, Noel & Hasegawa, Koichi & Asuka, Jusen, 2019. "Discursive resistance to phasing out coal-fired electricity: Narratives in Japan's coal regime," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 782-796.
    14. Ding, H. & Zhou, D.Q. & Liu, G.Q. & Zhou, P., 2020. "Cost reduction or electricity penetration: Government R&D-induced PV development and future policy schemes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    15. Managi, Shunsuke & Guan, Dabo, 2017. "Multiple disasters management: Lessons from the Fukushima triple events," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 114-122.
    16. Muhammad Omar & Arif Mehmood & Gyu Sang Choi & Han Woo Park, 2017. "Global mapping of artificial intelligence in Google and Google Scholar," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(3), pages 1269-1305, December.
    17. Arif Mehmood & Byung-Won On & Ingyu Lee & Han Woo Park & Gyu Sang Choi, 2018. "Corroborating social media echelon in cancer research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 801-813, March.
    18. Portugal-Pereira, J. & Ferreira, P. & Cunha, J. & Szklo, A. & Schaeffer, R. & Araújo, M., 2018. "Better late than never, but never late is better: Risk assessment of nuclear power construction projects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 158-166.
    19. Sun, Chuanwang & Zhu, Xiting & Meng, Xiaochun, 2016. "Post-Fukushima public acceptance on resuming the nuclear power program in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 685-694.
    20. Jun Maekawa & Bui Hien Hai & Sarana Shinkuma & Koji Shimada, 2018. "The Effect of Renewable Energy Generation on the Electric Power Spot Price of the Japan Electric Power Exchange," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:49:y:2015:i:4:p:1485-1512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.