IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v21y1987i1p3-20.html

Measurement error in causal analysis of panel data: Attenuated versus inflated relationships

Author

Listed:
  • Anders Westholm

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Anders Westholm, 1987. "Measurement error in causal analysis of panel data: Attenuated versus inflated relationships," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 3-20, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:21:y:1987:i:1:p:3-20
    DOI: 10.1007/BF00221711
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF00221711
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF00221711?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kenneth Bollen, 1984. "Multiple indicators: Internal consistency or no necessary relationship?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 377-385, August.
    2. Converse, Philip E., 1974. "Comment: The Status of Nonattitudes," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 68(2), pages 650-660, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammad Muzahid Akbar & Walter Wymer, 2017. "Refining the conceptualization of Brand Authenticity," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(1), pages 14-32, January.
    2. Catherine Chen & Bo MacInnis & Matthew Waltman & Jon A. Krosnick, 2021. "Public opinion on climate change in the USA: to what extent can it be nudged by questionnaire design features?," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 167(3), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Tanja Dmitrović & Vesna Žabkar, 2010. "Assessing Tourism Supply Quality Using Formative Indicators: Implications for Destination Management," Tourism Economics, , vol. 16(2), pages 405-425, June.
    4. Spencer Henson & Bruce Traill, 2000. "Measuring Perceived Performance of the Food System and Consumer Food‐Related Welfare," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 388-404, September.
    5. Möhlmann, Mareike, 2021. "Unjustified trust beliefs: Trust conflation on sharing economy platforms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(3).
    6. A. Maes & G. Poels, 2006. "Development of a user evaluations based quality model for conceptual modeling," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 06/406, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    7. Žabkar, Vesna & Brenčič, Maja Makovec & Dmitrović, Tanja, 2010. "Modelling perceived quality, visitor satisfaction and behavioural intentions at the destination level," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 537-546.
    8. Nick Lee & John W. Cadogan & Laura Chamberlain, 2013. "The MIMIC model and formative variables: problems and solutions," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 3(1), pages 3-17, March.
    9. Bartikowski, Boris & Richard, Marie-Odile & Gierl, Heribert, 2023. "Fit or misfit of culture in marketing communication? Development of the culture-ladenness fit index," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    10. Richard T. Carson, 2011. "Contingent Valuation," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2489.
    11. Carina Cornesse & Annelies G. Blom, 2023. "Response Quality in Nonprobability and Probability-based Online Panels," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 52(2), pages 879-908, May.
    12. Rashad Mammadli, 2022. "Pro-environmental consumption: effects on subjective well-being as a proxy for utility," RIEDS - Rivista Italiana di Economia, Demografia e Statistica - The Italian Journal of Economic, Demographic and Statistical Studies, SIEDS Societa' Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica, vol. 76(4), pages 4-12, October-D.
    13. Wilcox, James B. & Howell, Roy D. & Breivik, Einar, 2008. "Questions about formative measurement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(12), pages 1219-1228, December.
    14. Alex Michalos & Heather Creech & Natalie Swayze & P. Maurine Kahlke & Carolee Buckler & Karen Rempel, 2012. "Measuring Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviours Concerning Sustainable Development among Tenth Grade Students in Manitoba," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 106(2), pages 213-238, April.
    15. Rabindra Kumar Pradhan & Madhusmita Panda, 2021. "Human Resource Empowerment: Development and Validation of a Measurement Tool," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 22(4), pages 1019-1037, August.
    16. Miguel I. Aguirre-Urreta & George M. Marakas, 2014. "Research Note—Partial Least Squares and Models with Formatively Specified Endogenous Constructs: A Cautionary Note," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 761-778, December.
    17. Amihai Glazer & Bernard Grofman, 1989. "Why representatives are ideologists though voters are not," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 29-39, April.
    18. Shahid Amin & Shoaib Aslam, 2017. "Intellectual Capital, Innovation and Firm Performance of Pharmaceuticals: A Study of the London Stock Exchange," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(02), pages 1-20, June.
    19. Georg Fassott, 2006. "Operationalisierung latenter Variablen in Strukturgleichungsmodellen: Eine Standortbestimmung," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 67-88, February.
    20. Leonardo Salvatore Alaimo & Emiliano Seri, 2024. "Measuring human development by means of composite indicators: open issues and new methodological tools," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(6), pages 5275-5307, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:21:y:1987:i:1:p:3-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.