IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i8p2860-d348457.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and Psychometric Properties of a Questionnaire Assessing Self-Reported Generic Health Literacy in Adolescence

Author

Listed:
  • Olga Maria Domanska

    (Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, 12101 Berlin, Germany)

  • Torsten Michael Bollweg

    (Centre for Prevention and Intervention in Childhood and Adolescence (CPI), Faculty of Educational Science, Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany)

  • Anne-Kathrin Loer

    (Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, 12101 Berlin, Germany)

  • Christine Holmberg

    (Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, 14770 Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany)

  • Liane Schenk

    (Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany)

  • Susanne Jordan

    (Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, 12101 Berlin, Germany)

Abstract

Health literacy is a promising approach to promoting health and preventing disease among children and adolescents. Promoting health literacy in early stages of life could contribute to reducing health inequalities. However, it is difficult to identify concrete needs for action as there are few age-adjusted measures to assess generic health literacy in young people. Our aim was to develop a multidimensional measure of health literacy in German to assess generic health literacy among 14- to 17-year-old adolescents, namely, the “Measurement of Health Literacy Among Adolescents Questionnaire” (MOHLAA-Q). The development process included two stages. Stage 1 comprised the development and validation using a literature review, two rounds of cognitive interviews, two focus groups and two rounds of expert assessments by health literacy experts. Stage 2 included a standard pretest ( n = 625) of the questionnaire draft to examine the psychometric properties, reliability and different validity aspects. The MOHLAA-Q consists of 29 items in four scales: (A) “Dealing with health-related information (HLS-EU-Q12-adolescents-DE)”; (B) “Communication and interaction skills”, (C) “Attitudes toward one’s own health and health information”, and (D) “Health-related knowledge”. The confirmatory factor analysis indicated a multidimensional structure of the MOHLAA-Q. The internal consistency coefficients (Cronbach’s α) of the scales varied from 0.54 to 0.77. The development of the MOHLAA-Q constitutes a significant step towards the comprehensive measurement of adolescents’ health literacy. However, further research is necessary to re-examine its structural validity and to improve the internal consistency of two scales.

Suggested Citation

  • Olga Maria Domanska & Torsten Michael Bollweg & Anne-Kathrin Loer & Christine Holmberg & Liane Schenk & Susanne Jordan, 2020. "Development and Psychometric Properties of a Questionnaire Assessing Self-Reported Generic Health Literacy in Adolescence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-26, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:8:p:2860-:d:348457
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/8/2860/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/8/2860/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ellen Wartella & Vicky Rideout & Heather Montague & Leanne Beaudoin-Ryan & Alexis Lauricella, 2016. "Teens, Health and Technology: A National Survey," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 13-23.
    2. Anke Steckelberg & Christian Hülfenhaus & Jürgen Kasper & Ingrid Mühlhauser, 2009. "Ebm@school – a curriculum of critical health literacy for secondary school students: results of a pilot study," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 54(3), pages 158-165, May.
    3. Kenneth Bollen, 1984. "Multiple indicators: Internal consistency or no necessary relationship?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 377-385, August.
    4. Jane E. K. Hartley & Kate Levin & Candace Currie, 2016. "A new version of the HBSC Family Affluence Scale - FAS III: Scottish Qualitative Findings from the International FAS Development Study," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 9(1), pages 233-245, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anders L. Hage Haugen & Kirsti Riiser & Marc Esser-Noethlichs & Ove Edvard Hatlevik, 2022. "Developing Indicators to Measure Critical Health Literacy in the Context of Norwegian Lower Secondary Schools," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Anne-Kathrin M. Loer & Olga M. Domanska & Christiane Stock & Susanne Jordan, 2020. "Subjective Generic Health Literacy and Its Associated Factors among Adolescents: Results of a Population-Based Online Survey in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-23, November.
    3. Tetine Sentell & Sandra Vamos & Orkan Okan, 2020. "Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Health Literacy Research Around the World: More Important Than Ever in a Time of COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-13, April.
    4. Anne-Kathrin M. Loer & Olga Maria Domanska & Ronny Kuhnert & Robin Houben & Stefan Albrecht & Susanne Jordan, 2020. "Online Survey for the Assessment of Generic Health Literacy among Adolescents in Germany (GeKoJu): Study Protocol," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-13, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anne-Kathrin M. Loer & Olga Maria Domanska & Ronny Kuhnert & Robin Houben & Stefan Albrecht & Susanne Jordan, 2020. "Online Survey for the Assessment of Generic Health Literacy among Adolescents in Germany (GeKoJu): Study Protocol," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Anne-Kathrin M. Loer & Olga M. Domanska & Christiane Stock & Susanne Jordan, 2020. "Subjective Generic Health Literacy and Its Associated Factors among Adolescents: Results of a Population-Based Online Survey in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-23, November.
    3. Ibrahim Niankara & Muhammad Noor Al adwan & Aminata Niankara, 2020. "The Role of Digital Media in Shaping Youth Planetary Health Interests in the Global Economy," JOItmC, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-26, July.
    4. Róbert Ochaba & Tibor Baška & Martina Bašková, 2021. "Alcohol Use and Its Affordability in Adolescents in Slovakia between 2010 and 2018: Girls Are Less Adherent to Policy Measures," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-10, May.
    5. Tanja Dmitrović & Vesna Žabkar, 2010. "Assessing Tourism Supply Quality Using Formative Indicators: Implications for Destination Management," Tourism Economics, , vol. 16(2), pages 405-425, June.
    6. Erin Kasson & Melissa M. Vázquez & Christine Doroshenko & Ellen E. Fitzsimmons-Craft & Denise E. Wilfley & C. Barr Taylor & Patricia A. Cavazos-Rehg, 2021. "Exploring Social Media Recruitment Strategies and Preliminary Acceptability of an mHealth Tool for Teens with Eating Disorders," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-16, July.
    7. Mariusz Duplaga, 2020. "The Use of Fitness Influencers’ Websites by Young Adult Women: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-19, September.
    8. Anne-Kathrin M. Loer & Olga M. Domanska & Christiane Stock & Susanne Jordan, 2022. "Correction: Loer et al. Subjective Generic Health Literacy and Its Associated Factors among Adolescents: Results of a Population-Based Online Survey in Germany. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 202," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-3, February.
    9. Spencer Henson & Bruce Traill, 2000. "Measuring Perceived Performance of the Food System and Consumer Food‐Related Welfare," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 388-404, September.
    10. Möhlmann, Mareike, 2021. "Unjustified trust beliefs: Trust conflation on sharing economy platforms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(3).
    11. A. Maes & G. Poels, 2006. "Development of a user evaluations based quality model for conceptual modeling," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 06/406, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    12. Amaresh Panda & Sanjay Mohapatra, 2021. "Online Healthcare Practices and Associated Stakeholders: Review of Literature for Future Research Agenda," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 46(2), pages 71-85, June.
    13. Tafadzwa Mindu & Innocent Tinashe Mutero & Winnie Baphumelele Ngcobo & Rosemary Musesengwa & Moses John Chimbari, 2023. "Digital Mental Health Interventions for Young People in Rural South Africa: Prospects and Challenges for Implementation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-15, January.
    14. Mona Mohammed Al-Bisher & Hala Hazam Al-Otaibi, 2022. "Eating Concerns Associated with Nutritional Information Obtained from Social Media among Saudi Young Females: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Bartikowski, Boris & Richard, Marie-Odile & Gierl, Heribert, 2023. "Fit or misfit of culture in marketing communication? Development of the culture-ladenness fit index," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    16. Rashad Mammadli, 2022. "Pro-environmental consumption: effects on subjective well-being as a proxy for utility," RIEDS - Rivista Italiana di Economia, Demografia e Statistica - The Italian Journal of Economic, Demographic and Statistical Studies, SIEDS Societa' Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica, vol. 76(4), pages 4-12, October-D.
    17. Cahyono, Edi Dwi, 2023. "Instagram adoption for local food transactions: A research framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    18. Wilcox, James B. & Howell, Roy D. & Breivik, Einar, 2008. "Questions about formative measurement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(12), pages 1219-1228, December.
    19. Alex Michalos & Heather Creech & Natalie Swayze & P. Maurine Kahlke & Carolee Buckler & Karen Rempel, 2012. "Measuring Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviours Concerning Sustainable Development among Tenth Grade Students in Manitoba," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 106(2), pages 213-238, April.
    20. Rabindra Kumar Pradhan & Madhusmita Panda, 2021. "Human Resource Empowerment: Development and Validation of a Measurement Tool," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 22(4), pages 1019-1037, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:8:p:2860-:d:348457. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.