IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v7y2014i1p23-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Introduction to Item Response Theory for Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement

Author

Listed:
  • Tam Nguyen
  • Hae-Ra Han
  • Miyong Kim
  • Kitty Chan

Abstract

The growing emphasis on patient-centered care has accelerated the demand for high-quality data from patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. Traditionally, the development and validation of these measures has been guided by classical test theory. However, item response theory (IRT), an alternate measurement framework, offers promise for addressing practical measurement problems found in health-related research that have been difficult to solve through classical methods. This paper introduces foundational concepts in IRT, as well as commonly used models and their assumptions. Existing data on a combined sample (n = 636) of Korean American and Vietnamese American adults who responded to the High Blood Pressure Health Literacy Scale and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 are used to exemplify typical applications of IRT. These examples illustrate how IRT can be used to improve the development, refinement, and evaluation of PRO measures. Greater use of methods based on this framework can increase the accuracy and efficiency with which PROs are measured. Copyright Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Tam Nguyen & Hae-Ra Han & Miyong Kim & Kitty Chan, 2014. "An Introduction to Item Response Theory for Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 7(1), pages 23-35, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:7:y:2014:i:1:p:23-35
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-013-0041-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s40271-013-0041-0
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-013-0041-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lynn Murphy Michalopoulos & Melissa Meinhart & Sam Monroe Barton & Jillian Kuhn & Miriam N. Mukasa & Flavia Namuwonge & Candice Feiring & Fred M. Ssewamala, 2019. "Adaptation and Validation of the Shame Questionnaire Among Ugandan Youth Living with HIV," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 12(3), pages 1023-1042, June.
    2. Dominik M. Piehlmaier, 2022. "Overconfidence and the adoption of robo-advice: why overconfident investors drive the expansion of automated financial advice," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-24, December.
    3. repec:oup:jecgeo:v:50:y:2023:i:2:p:426-446. is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Piehlmaier, Dominik M. & Stagno, Emanuela & Nagy, Agnes, 2023. "Overconfidence at the time of COVID-19:Does it lead to laxer attitudes?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    5. Dominik M Piehlmaier & J Jeffrey Inman & Andrew T Stephen & Andrew T Stephen, 2023. "The One-Man Show: The Effect of Joint Decision-Making on Investor Overconfidence," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 50(2), pages 426-446.
    6. Rana Momani, 2018. "Using Item Response Theory to Evaluate Self-directed Learning Readiness Scale," Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, January.
    7. Sha Li & Daniel Yee Tak Fong & Sarah Lai Yin Wan & Bradley McPherson & Esther Yuet Ying Lau & Lixi Huang & Mary Sau Man Ip & Janet Yuen Ha Wong, 2021. "A Short Form of the Chinese Version of the Weinstein Noise Sensitivity Scale through Optimal Test Assembly," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-10, January.
    8. Vasco Francisco Japissane Cumbe & Claire Greene & Afonso Mazine Tiago Fumo & Hélder Fumo & Dirceu Mabunda & Lídia Chaúque Gouveia & Maria A. Oquendo & Cristiane S. Duarte & Mohsin Sidat & Jair de Jesu, 2022. "Community Health Workers’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices towards Epilepsy in Sofala, Central Mozambique," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-13, November.
    9. Fuchs, Lisa Elena & Orero, Levi & Apondi, Victoria Atieno & Kipkorir, Lang'at, 2021. "How to stop wasting money in international development: Using a structured group selection approach to counter procedural inefficiency," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 24(C).
    10. Sara Fernandes & Guillaume Fond & Xavier Zendjidjian & Pierre Michel & Karine Baumstarck & Christophe Lançon & Ludovic Samalin & Pierre-Michel Llorca & Magali Coldefy & Pascal Auquier & Laurent Boyer , 2022. "Development and Calibration of the PREMIUM Item Bank for Measuring Respect and Dignity for Patients with Severe Mental Illness," Post-Print hal-03649277, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:7:y:2014:i:1:p:23-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.