IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v98y2025ics0047235225000510.html

An item response theory approach to punitive attitudes

Author

Listed:
  • Trajtenberg, Nicolas
  • Ezquerra, Pablo

Abstract

Concerns about how punitive attitudes are measured are long-standing in the academic literature. However, empirical research in this area has often overlooked variations in the difficulty of punitive items and differences in individual dispositions. To address these challenges, this paper explores the measurement of punitive attitudes through the application of Item Response Theory to a representative sample of Uruguayan citizens. By addressing the limitations of Classical Test Theory in criminological research, we provide a more nuanced understanding of punitive attitudes, distinguishing the difficulty of survey items from respondents' underlying traits. Our analysis highlights significant variation in item difficulty and discrimination, showing that assuming that all punitive measures reflect equivalent levels of punitiveness is problematic. Our findings identify gaps in the measurement of individuals with higher levels of punitiveness and suggest that frequently used survey items may fail to capture the full spectrum of punitive attitudes. This research emphasizes the need to refine survey instruments to enhance the validity and reliability of scales of punitive attitudes, thereby contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of public opinion regarding crime and punishment.

Suggested Citation

  • Trajtenberg, Nicolas & Ezquerra, Pablo, 2025. "An item response theory approach to punitive attitudes," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:98:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225000510
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235225000510
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102402?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Piquero, Alex R. & MacIntosh, Randall & Hickman, Matthew, 2001. "Applying Rasch modeling to the validity of a control balance scale," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 493-505.
    2. Hickman, Matthew J. & Piquero, Nicole L. & Piquero, Alex R., 2004. "The validity of Niederhoffer's cynicism scale," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 1-13.
    3. Chalmers, R. Philip, 2012. "mirt: A Multidimensional Item Response Theory Package for the R Environment," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i06).
    4. Tam Nguyen & Hae-Ra Han & Miyong Kim & Kitty Chan, 2014. "An Introduction to Item Response Theory for Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 7(1), pages 23-35, March.
    5. Applegate, Brandon K. & Cullen, Francis T. & Fisher, Bonnie S., 2002. "Public views toward crime and correctional policies: Is there a gender gap?," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 89-100.
    6. Choi, Seung W. & Gibbons, Laura E. & Crane, Paul K., 2011. "lordif: An R Package for Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Iterative Hybrid Ordinal Logistic Regression/Item Response Theory and Monte Carlo Simulations," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 39(i08).
    7. Payne, Brian K. & Gainey, Randy R. & Triplett, Ruth A. & Danner, Mona J. E., 2004. "What drives punitive beliefs?: Demographic characteristics and justifications for sentencing," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 195-206.
    8. Peter K. Enns, 2014. "The Public's Increasing Punitiveness and Its Influence on Mass Incarceration in the United States," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(4), pages 857-872, October.
    9. Cullen, Francis T. & Cullen, John B. & Wozniak, John F., 1988. "Is rehabilitation dead? The myth of the punitive public," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 303-317.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pyrooz, David C. & Densley, James A. & Sanchez, Jose Antonio, 2024. "Does the public support anti-gang policies and practices and can opinions be swayed? Experimental evidence from a National Survey of Americans," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    2. Yikun Luo & Qipeng Chen & Jianyong Chen & Peida Zhan, 2024. "Development and validation of two shortened anxiety sensitive index-3 scales based on item response theory," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-7, December.
    3. Cervantes, Víctor H., 2017. "DFIT: An R Package for Raju's Differential Functioning of Items and Tests Framework," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 76(i05).
    4. Kai Liu & Longfei Zhang & Dongbo Tu & Yan Cai, 2022. "Developing an Item Bank of Computerized Adaptive Testing for Eating Disorders in Chinese University Students," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.
    5. Alex Bató & Valentin Brodszky & Ariel Zoltán Mitev & Balázs Jenei & Fanni Rencz, 2024. "Psychometric properties and general population reference values for PROMIS Global Health in Hungary," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 25(4), pages 549-562, June.
    6. Shaojie Wang & Won-Chan Lee & Huixia Ma, 2024. "The Chinese Version of the Couples Satisfaction Index: Psychometric Assessment and Differential Item Functioning Analysis with Item Response Theory," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, August.
    7. Ke-Hai Yuan & Hongyun Liu & Yuting Han, 2021. "Differential Item Functioning Analysis Without A Priori Information on Anchor Items: QQ Plots and Graphical Test," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(2), pages 345-377, June.
    8. Mancini, Christina & Mears, Daniel P., 2010. "To execute or not to execute? Examining public support for capital punishment of sex offenders," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 959-968, September.
    9. Buckler, Kevin & Cullen, Francis T. & Unnever, James D., 2007. "Citizen assessment of local criminal courts: Does fairness matter?," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 524-536.
    10. Cook, Carrie L. & Lane, Jodi, 2009. "The place of public fear in sentencing and correctional policy," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 586-595, November.
    11. Benjamin D. Schalet & Sangdon Lim & David Cella & Seung W. Choi, 2021. "Linking Scores with Patient-Reported Health Outcome Instruments:A VALIDATION STUDY AND COMPARISON OF THREE LINKING METHODS," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(3), pages 717-746, September.
    12. Rikkert M. van der Lans & Ridwan Maulana & Michelle Helms-Lorenz & Carmen-María Fernández-García & Seyeoung Chun & Thelma de Jager & Yulia Irnidayanti & Mercedes Inda-Caro & Okhwa Lee & Thys Coetze, 2021. "Student Perceptions of Teaching Quality in Five Countries: A Partial Credit Model Approach to Assess Measurement Invariance," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    13. Sara Fernandes & Guillaume Fond & Xavier Zendjidjian & Pierre Michel & Karine Baumstarck & Christophe Lançon & Ludovic Samalin & Pierre-Michel Llorca & Magali Coldefy & Pascal Auquier & Laurent Boyer , 2022. "Development and Calibration of the PREMIUM Item Bank for Measuring Respect and Dignity for Patients with Severe Mental Illness," Post-Print hal-03649277, HAL.
    14. Beadle, Brian, 2023. "The design and application of an agricultural sustainability index using item response theory," EconStor Theses, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 278112.
    15. Marvin D. Krohn & Terence P. Thornberry & Chris L. Gibson & Julie M. Baldwin, 2010. "The Development and Impact of Self-Report Measures of Crime and Delinquency," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 509-525, December.
    16. Jeanne A. Teresi & Chun Wang & Marjorie Kleinman & Richard N. Jones & David J. Weiss, 2021. "Differential Item Functioning Analyses of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Measures: Methods, Challenges, Advances, and Future Directions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(3), pages 674-711, September.
    17. Na Shan & Ping-Feng Xu, 2025. "Bayesian Adaptive Lasso for the Detection of Differential Item Functioning in Graded Response Models," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 50(2), pages 187-213, April.
    18. Payne, Brian K. & Tewksbury, Richard & Mustaine, Elizabeth Ehrhardt, 2010. "Attitudes about rehabilitating sex offenders: Demographic, victimization, and community-level influences," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 580-588, July.
    19. Izolda Pristojkovic Suko & Magdalena Holter & Erwin Stolz & Elfriede Renate Greimel & Wolfgang Freidl, 2022. "Acculturation, Adaptation, and Health among Croatian Migrants in Austria and Ireland: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-15, December.
    20. Benjamin W. Domingue & Klint Kanopka & Ben Stenhaug & Michael J. Sulik & Tanesia Beverly & Matthieu Brinkhuis & Ruhan Circi & Jessica Faul & Dandan Liao & Bruce McCandliss & Jelena Obradović & Chris , 2022. "Speed–Accuracy Trade-Off? Not So Fast: Marginal Changes in Speed Have Inconsistent Relationships With Accuracy in Real-World Settings," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 47(5), pages 576-602, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:98:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225000510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.