IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opsear/v60y2023i3d10.1007_s12597-023-00671-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A fuzzy-QFD approach to manufacturing strategy formulation

Author

Listed:
  • Sourabh Devidas Kulkarni

    (FORE School of Management)

  • Priyanka Verma

    (National Institute of Industrial Engineering (NITIE))

Abstract

Modern firms adopt Advanced Manufacturing Technologies (AMTs) in the quest for their competitive success, but often end up in the huge capital investments in technology upgradations. The purpose of this work is to demonstrate firm-specific efforts to leverage AMTs through Manufacturing Strategy (MS) formulation utilizing Fuzzy-Quality Function Deployment (QFD) in selected three firms representing varying industrial context. Fuzzy-QFD is operationalized using the quantitative inputs on MS formulation such as- (1) Relative strategic importance of competitive priorities (“what”) (2) Linkage between Competitive priorities and MS elements (“what-how”). The results of Fuzzy-QFD model based MS formulation are then shared and validated on detailed discussions with the industry experts. These discussions reveal intricacies of MS formulation and its impact on business processes and operational plan. This study shows two interesting findings- first, the competitive priorities sequence (Quality-Flexibility-Delivery-Cost) for select firms differs than the classical sandcone sequence (i.e., Quality-Delivery-Flexibility-Cost). Second, even with common competitive priorities sequence, firms show the unique way of the realization of MS exhibiting the complex and idiosyncratic nature of strategic decisions. Manufacturing Managers can utilize The study provides analytically efficient and easy way to MS formulation. Further, the findings of the study can help firms to align their operational plans and AMTs as per competitive requirements.

Suggested Citation

  • Sourabh Devidas Kulkarni & Priyanka Verma, 2023. "A fuzzy-QFD approach to manufacturing strategy formulation," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 60(3), pages 1407-1432, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:60:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s12597-023-00671-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s12597-023-00671-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12597-023-00671-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12597-023-00671-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. P. Senthil Kumar, 2018. "A note on 'a new approach for solving intuitionistic fuzzy transportation problem of type-2'," International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 29(1), pages 102-129.
    2. Hallgren, Mattias & Olhager, Jan, 2006. "Quantification in manufacturing strategy: A methodology and illustration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 113-124, November.
    3. Miltenburg, John, 2008. "Setting manufacturing strategy for a factory-within-a-factory," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 307-323, May.
    4. P. Senthil Kumar, 2019. "Intuitionistic fuzzy solid assignment problems: a software-based approach," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(4), pages 661-675, August.
    5. Pankaj Ghemawat & Daniel Levinthal, 2008. "Choice Interactions and Business Strategy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(9), pages 1638-1651, September.
    6. Bottani, Eleonora, 2009. "A fuzzy QFD approach to achieve agility," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 380-391, June.
    7. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    8. P. Senthil Kumar, 2016. "PSK Method for Solving Type-1 and Type-3 Fuzzy Transportation Problems," International Journal of Fuzzy System Applications (IJFSA), IGI Global, vol. 5(4), pages 121-146, October.
    9. Cai, Shaohan & Yang, Zhilin, 2014. "On the relationship between business environment and competitive priorities: The role of performance frontiers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 131-145.
    10. Jan W. Rivkin, 2000. "Imitation of Complex Strategies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(6), pages 824-844, June.
    11. Sourabh Kulkarni & Priyanka Verma & R. Mukundan, 2019. "Assessing manufacturing strategy definitions utilising text-mining," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(14), pages 4519-4546, July.
    12. Daniel A. Levinthal, 1997. "Adaptation on Rugged Landscapes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(7), pages 934-950, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. P. Senthil Kumar, 2019. "PSK Method for Solving Mixed and Type-4 Intuitionistic Fuzzy Solid Transportation Problems," International Journal of Operations Research and Information Systems (IJORIS), IGI Global, vol. 10(2), pages 20-53, April.
    2. Giovanni Gavetti, 2012. "PERSPECTIVE—Toward a Behavioral Theory of Strategy," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 267-285, February.
    3. Gatti, Corrado & Volpe, Loredana & Vagnani, Gianluca, 2015. "Interdependence among productive activities: Implications for exploration and exploitation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 711-722.
    4. Giovanni. Gavetti & Daniel A. Levinthal, 2004. "50th Anniversay Article: The Strategy Field from the Perspective of Management Science: Divergent Strands and Possible Integration," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(10), pages 1309-1318, October.
    5. Stephan Billinger & Kannan Srikanth & Nils Stieglitz & Terry R. Schumacher, 2021. "Exploration and exploitation in complex search tasks: How feedback influences whether and where human agents search," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 361-385, February.
    6. Michael J. Leiblein & Jeffrey J. Reuer & Todd Zenger, 2018. "What Makes a Decision Strategic?," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(4), pages 558-573, December.
    7. Rahul Kapoor, 2013. "Persistence of Integration in the Face of Specialization: How Firms Navigated the Winds of Disintegration and Shaped the Architecture of the Semiconductor Industry," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 1195-1213, August.
    8. Sudharshan, Devanathan & Furrer, Olivier & Arakoni, Ramesh A., 2013. "Robust Imitation Strategies," FSES Working Papers 446, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Freiburg/Fribourg Switzerland.
    9. Celo, Sokol & Nebus, James & Kim Wang, I., 2015. "MNC structure, complexity, and performance: Insights from NK methodology," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 182-199.
    10. Vikas A. Aggarwal & Brian Wu, 2015. "Organizational Constraints to Adaptation: Intrafirm Asymmetry in the Locus of Coordination," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 218-238, February.
    11. P. Senthil Kumar, 2020. "Developing a New Approach to Solve Solid Assignment Problems Under Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment," International Journal of Fuzzy System Applications (IJFSA), IGI Global, vol. 9(1), pages 1-34, January.
    12. Celo, Sokol & Nebus, James & Wang, I. Kim, 2018. "The Role of Internal and External Complexity in Global Factory Performance: An NKC Application," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 65-83.
    13. Arie Y. Lewin & Silvia Massini & Carine Peeters, 2011. "Microfoundations of Internal and External Absorptive Capacity Routines," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 81-98, February.
    14. Hart E. Posen & Sangyoon Yi & Jeho Lee, 2020. "A contingency perspective on imitation strategies: When is “benchmarking” ineffective?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 198-221, February.
    15. Sidney G. Winter & Gabriel Szulanski & Dimo Ringov & Robert J. Jensen, 2012. "Reproducing Knowledge: Inaccurate Replication and Failure in Franchise Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 672-685, June.
    16. Svenja C. Sommer & Christoph H. Loch & Jing Dong, 2009. "Managing Complexity and Unforeseeable Uncertainty in Startup Companies: An Empirical Study," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 118-133, February.
    17. Celo, Sokol & Lehrer, Mark, 2022. "How much lateral collaboration is optimal? Insights from computer simulations of MNEs as complex adaptive systems," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(3).
    18. P. Senthil Kumar, 2020. "Algorithms for solving the optimization problems using fuzzy and intuitionistic fuzzy set," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(1), pages 189-222, February.
    19. Robert Gibbons & Rebecca Henderson, 2012. "Relational Contracts and Organizational Capabilities," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(5), pages 1350-1364, October.
    20. Friederike Wall, 2016. "Agent-based modeling in managerial science: an illustrative survey and study," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 135-193, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:60:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s12597-023-00671-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.