IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opmare/v16y2023i4d10.1007_s12063-023-00386-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling challenges of blockchain technology enabled healthcare sustainable supply chain management: a modified-total interpretive structural modelling approach

Author

Listed:
  • Amit Vishwakarma

    (Malaviya National Institute of Technology
    Sharda University)

  • G. S. Dangayach

    (Malaviya National Institute of Technology)

  • M. L. Meena

    (Malaviya National Institute of Technology)

  • Manish Kumar Jindal

    (Quality Council of India)

  • Sumit Gupta

    (Amity University Uttar Pradesh)

  • Sandeep Jagtap

    (Cranfield University)

Abstract

Blockchain technology (BCT) is beneficial for the Healthcare Sustainable Supply Chain (HSSC), and the adoption of this technology provides many benefits improving the performance of the supply chain, effortless information sharing, mitigation of data modification, etc. On the contrary, this study focuses on the various challenges that come in the path while adopting the BCT. For this, the present study initially identified the multiple challenges from the in-depth literature review. Then, the Delphi method was applied for further analysis and scalability of each challenge. Afterward, Modified-Total Interpretive Structural Modeling (M-TISM) approach is used for identifying the criticality of challenges based on the classification of challenges into different levels. This operation provides the driving and dependence power of each challenge.Furthermore, MICMAC (Cross-Impact Matrix Multiplication Analysis) analysis was performed. At the end of the analysis, the authors found the six critical challenges related to the adoption of BCT in the Healthcare Sustainable Supply Chain (HSSC). These critical challenges are the Economical Challenge (C3), Stakeholder commitment and careful handling of BCT (C2), Combining SSCM practices to BCT(C7), Lack of government intentions to promote BCT in SCM (C6), Data Security threat (C1) and Poor infrastructure for the adoption of BCT (C4). The stakeholders of HSSC should make an effort to control them on a priority basis. In addition to this, the authors also provided the practical implication of the study and future research direction for better adoption of BCT in the Healthcare Sustainable Supply Chain.

Suggested Citation

  • Amit Vishwakarma & G. S. Dangayach & M. L. Meena & Manish Kumar Jindal & Sumit Gupta & Sandeep Jagtap, 2023. "Modelling challenges of blockchain technology enabled healthcare sustainable supply chain management: a modified-total interpretive structural modelling approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1781-1790, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:opmare:v:16:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s12063-023-00386-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s12063-023-00386-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12063-023-00386-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12063-023-00386-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Yingli & Singgih, Meita & Wang, Jingyao & Rit, Mihaela, 2019. "Making sense of blockchain technology: How will it transform supply chains?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 221-236.
    2. Sushil, 2019. "Efficient interpretive ranking process incorporating implicit and transitive dominance relationships," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1489-1516, December.
    3. Dutta, Pankaj & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Somani, Surabhi & Butala, Richa, 2020. "Blockchain technology in supply chain operations: Applications, challenges and research opportunities," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    4. Lakhan Patidar & Vimlesh Kumar Soni & Pradeep Kumar Soni, 2017. "Manufacturing wastes analysis in lean environment: an integrated ISM-fuzzy MICMAC approach," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(2), pages 1783-1809, November.
    5. Hughes, Laurie & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Misra, Santosh K. & Rana, Nripendra P. & Raghavan, Vishnupriya & Akella, Viswanadh, 2019. "Blockchain research, practice and policy: Applications, benefits, limitations, emerging research themes and research agenda," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 114-129.
    6. Angelis, Jannis & Ribeiro da Silva, Elias, 2019. "Blockchain adoption: A value driver perspective," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 307-314.
    7. Kouhizadeh, Mahtab & Saberi, Sara & Sarkis, Joseph, 2021. "Blockchain technology and the sustainable supply chain: Theoretically exploring adoption barriers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    8. Morkunas, Vida J. & Paschen, Jeannette & Boon, Edward, 2019. "How blockchain technologies impact your business model," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 295-306.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Jian & Zhang, Xuanjian & Liu, Wei & Ji, Ming & Mishra, Arunodaya Raj, 2022. "Critical success factors of blockchain technology to implement the sustainable supply chain using an extended decision-making approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    2. Pattanayak, Sirsha & Ramkumar, M. & Goswami, Mohit & Rana, Nripendra P., 2024. "Blockchain technology and supply chain performance: The role of trust and relational capabilities," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    3. Weili Yin & Wenxue Ran, 2021. "Theoretical Exploration of Supply Chain Viability Utilizing Blockchain Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-25, July.
    4. Omar Boutkhoum & Mohamed Hanine & Mohamed Nabil & Fatima El Barakaz & Ernesto Lee & Furqan Rustam & Imran Ashraf, 2021. "Analysis and Evaluation of Barriers Influencing Blockchain Implementation in Moroccan Sustainable Supply Chain Management: An Integrated IFAHP-DEMATEL Framework," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(14), pages 1-23, July.
    5. Amin Vafadarnikjoo & Hadi Badri Ahmadi & James J. H. Liou & Tiago Botelho & Konstantinos Chalvatzis, 2023. "Analyzing blockchain adoption barriers in manufacturing supply chains by the neutrosophic analytic hierarchy process," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 327(1), pages 129-156, August.
    6. Jaspreet Kaur & Satish Kumar & Balkrishna E. Narkhede & Marina Dabić & Ajay Pal Singh Rathore & Rohit Joshi, 2024. "Barriers to blockchain adoption for supply chain finance: the case of Indian SMEs," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 303-340, March.
    7. Kouhizadeh, Mahtab & Saberi, Sara & Sarkis, Joseph, 2021. "Blockchain technology and the sustainable supply chain: Theoretically exploring adoption barriers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    8. Bai, Chunguang & Zhu, Qingyun & Sarkis, Joseph, 2024. "Do blockchain capabilities help overcome supply and operational risks: Insights from firm market returns during COVID-19," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    9. Orji, Ifeyinwa Juliet & Kusi-Sarpong, Simonov & Huang, Shuangfa & Vazquez-Brust, Diego, 2020. "Evaluating the factors that influence blockchain adoption in the freight logistics industry," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    10. Yadav, Amit Kumar & Shweta, & Kumar, Dinesh, 2023. "Blockchain technology and vaccine supply chain: Exploration and analysis of the adoption barriers in the Indian context," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    11. Bhimani, Alnoor & Hausken, Kjell & Arif, Sameen, 2022. "Do national development factors affect cryptocurrency adoption?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    12. Bai, Chunguang & Sarkis, Joseph, 2022. "A critical review of formal analytical modeling for blockchain technology in production, operations, and supply chains: Harnessing progress for future potential," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    13. Antonella Moretto & Laura Macchion, 2022. "Drivers, barriers and supply chain variables influencing the adoption of the blockchain to support traceability along fashion supply chains," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 1470-1489, December.
    14. Hosseini Dehshiri, Seyyed Jalaladdin & Amiri, Maghsoud & Mostafaeipour, Ali & Le, Ttu, 2024. "Integrating blockchain and strategic alliance in renewable energy supply chain toward sustainability: A comparative decision framework under uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    15. Elnaz Irannezhad, 2020. "The Architectural Design Requirements of a Blockchain-Based Port Community System," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-31, November.
    16. Cao, Yifan & Shen, Bin, 2022. "Adopting blockchain technology to block less sustainable products’ entry in global trade," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    17. Ieva Meidute-Kavaliauskiene & Bülent Yıldız & Şemsettin Çiğdem & Renata Činčikaitė, 2021. "An Integrated Impact of Blockchain on Supply Chain Applications," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-18, June.
    18. Büyüközkan, Gülçin & Tüfekçi, Gizem & Uztürk, Deniz, 2021. "Evaluating Blockchain requirements for effective digital supply chain management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    19. Büttgen, Marion & al.,, 2021. "Blockchain in Service Management and Service Research - Developing a Research Agenda and Managerial Implications," SMR - Journal of Service Management Research, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 5(2), pages 71-102.
    20. Adeeb Noor, 2022. "Adoption of Blockchain Technology Facilitates a Competitive Edge for Logistic Service Providers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opmare:v:16:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s12063-023-00386-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.