IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v119y2023i3d10.1007_s11069-023-06196-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Bayesian method for dam failure risk analysis using causal loop diagrams and word frequency analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Fang Wang

    (Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute)

  • Hongen Li

    (Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute
    State Key Laboratory of Hydrology, Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering)

  • Jinbao Sheng

    (Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute
    State Key Laboratory of Hydrology, Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering)

  • Li Yuan

    (Hohai University)

  • Yuxuan Pan

    (Hohai University)

  • Jianguo Zhao

    (Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute)

Abstract

Earthen dams are exposed to complex environments where their safety is often affected by multiple uncertain risks. A Bayesian network (BN) is often used to analyze the dam failure risk, which is an effective tool for this issue as its excellent ability in representing uncertainty and reasoning. The validity of the BN model is strongly dependent on the quality of the sample data, making convincing modeling rationale a challenge. There has been a lack of systematic analysis of the dam failure data of China, resulting in limited exploration of the potential associations between risk factors. In this paper, we established a comprehensive database containing various dam failure cases in China. Herein, historical dam failure statistics are used to develop BN models for risk analysis of earthen dams in China. In order to unleash the value of the historical data, we established a Bayesian network through the Causal Loop Diagrams (CLD) based on the nonlinear causal analysis. We determined the conditional probabilities using Word Frequency Analysis (WFA). By comparing with the Bayesian Learning results, the modeling method of BN proposed in our study has apparent advantages. According to the BN model established in this paper, the probabilities of dam failure due to seepage damage, overtopping, and structural instability are estimated to be 22.1%, 58.1%, and 7.9%, respectively. In addition, we presented a demonstration of the inference process for the dam failure path, which will offer valuable insights to dam safety practitioners during their decision-making process.

Suggested Citation

  • Fang Wang & Hongen Li & Jinbao Sheng & Li Yuan & Yuxuan Pan & Jianguo Zhao, 2023. "A Bayesian method for dam failure risk analysis using causal loop diagrams and word frequency analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 119(3), pages 2159-2177, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:119:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-023-06196-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-023-06196-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-023-06196-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-023-06196-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Lorenz & S. Battiston & F. Schweitzer, 2009. "Systemic risk in a unifying framework for cascading processes on networks," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 71(4), pages 441-460, October.
    2. Alan C. Brent & Josephine K. Musango & Suzanne Smit & Nalini S. Pillay & Andries Botha & Rudolph Louw & Stephen Roper & Thokozani Simelani & Jai K. Clifford-Holmes & Leon Pretorius, 2017. "Utilization of System Dynamics in Southern Africa: A Systematic Review," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(6), pages 657-670, November.
    3. Leo Egghe, 2009. "New relations between similarity measures for vectors based on vector norms," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 60(2), pages 232-239, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paulo Ferreira & Éder J.A.L. Pereira & Hernane B.B. Pereira, 2020. "From Big Data to Econophysics and Its Use to Explain Complex Phenomena," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-10, July.
    2. Ellinas, Christos & Allan, Neil & Johansson, Anders, 2016. "Project systemic risk: Application examples of a network model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 50-62.
    3. Sam Langfield & Kimmo Soramäki, 2016. "Interbank Exposure Networks," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 47(1), pages 3-17, January.
    4. Paolo Giudici & Laura Parisi, 2019. "Bail-In or Bail-Out? Correlation Networks to Measure the Systemic Implications of Bank Resolution," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-25, January.
    5. Giada Adelfio & Arianna Agosto & Marcello Chiodi & Paolo Giudici, 2021. "Financial contagion through space-time point processes," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(2), pages 665-688, June.
    6. Periklis Gogas & Theophilos Papadimitriou & Maria-Artemis Matthaiou, 2014. "A Novel Banking Supervision Method Using the Minimum Dominating Set," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, in: Valery A. Kalyagin & Panos M. Pardalos & Themistocles M. Rassias (ed.), Network Models in Economics and Finance, edition 127, pages 277-286, Springer.
    7. J. Lorenz & S. Battiston & F. Schweitzer, 2009. "Systemic risk in a unifying framework for cascading processes on networks," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 71(4), pages 441-460, October.
    8. Erhan Bayraktar & Gaoyue Guo & Wenpin Tang & Yuming Paul Zhang, 2022. "Systemic robustness: a mean-field particle system approach," Papers 2212.08518, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2023.
    9. Paolo Giudici & Laura Parisi, 2016. "CoRisk: measuring systemic risk through default probability contagion," DEM Working Papers Series 116, University of Pavia, Department of Economics and Management.
    10. Teruyoshi Kobayashi & Kohei Hasui, 2013. "Efficient immunization strategies to prevent financial contagion," Papers 1308.0652, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2013.
    11. Covi, Giovanni & Gorpe, Mehmet Ziya & Kok, Christoffer, 2021. "CoMap: Mapping Contagion in the Euro Area Banking Sector," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    12. Cristian Colliander & Per Ahlgren, 2012. "Experimental comparison of first and second-order similarities in a scientometric context," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 90(2), pages 675-685, February.
    13. Giudici, Paolo, 2018. "Financial data science," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 160-164.
    14. Sandoval, Leonidas Junior, 2013. "To lag or not to lag? How to compare indices of stock markets that operate at different times," Insper Working Papers wpe_319, Insper Working Paper, Insper Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa.
    15. Ying Chen & Paolo Giudici & Branka Hadji Misheva & Simon Trimborn, 2020. "Lead Behaviour in Bitcoin Markets," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, January.
    16. Kobayashi, Teruyoshi, 2014. "A model of financial contagion with variable asset returns may be replaced with a simple threshold model of cascades," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 113-116.
    17. Konstantina Sdravopoulou & Juan Manuel Muñoz González & María Dolores Hidalgo-Ariza, 2021. "Educating Adults with a Location-Based Augmented Reality Game: A Content Analysis Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(17), pages 1-16, August.
    18. Mario Eboli & Bulent Ozel & Andrea Teglio & Andrea Toto, 2023. "Connectivity, centralisation and ‘robustness-yet-fragility’ of interbank networks," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 169-200, June.
    19. I. Bonamassa & B. Gross & J. Kertész & S. Havlin, 2025. "Hybrid universality classes of systemic cascades," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-10, December.
    20. F. Schweitzer & D. Garcia, 2010. "An agent-based model of collective emotions in online communities," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 77(4), pages 533-545, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:119:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-023-06196-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.