IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v111y2022i2d10.1007_s11069-021-05098-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Flood hazard mapping in western Iran: assessment of deep learning vis-à-vis machine learning models

Author

Listed:
  • Eslam Satarzadeh

    (Islamic Azad University)

  • Amirpouya Sarraf

    (Islamic Azad University)

  • Hooman Hajikandi

    (Islamic Azad University)

  • Mohammad Sadegh Sadeghian

    (Islamic Azad University)

Abstract

On March 25, 2019, widespread flood events occurred across Iran’s provinces and set a new record for socioeconomic losses and casualties. In hindsight, it opened an engrossed area of research for flood hazard mapping, something that has previously been pursued yet not embraced as must they should. In pursuit of reconciling the decision-makers and authorities with the successful application of machine/deep learning models in pattern extraction and detection of hotspots, we employed a deep learning model named Deep Belief Network (DBN), and then it was hybridized using particle swarm optimization (DBN-PSO) and genetic algorithm (DBN-GA). Their results were compared to Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) that have been known as benchmark models in the field of flood susceptibility. The area under the receiver operatic characteristic curve (AUC) and True Skill Statistic (TSS) were used for performance assessment through three sample partitioning replicates, which further indicated models’ predictive performance and robustness. Results revealed that DBN-PSO was the best model in terms of prediction performance (AUCmean = 0.957, TSSmean = 0.748) and robustness (RAUC = 0.6%, RTSS = 0.8%). Furthermore, all the standalone DBN and its hybrid models outperformed benchmark models including RF (AUCmean = 0.911, TSSmean = 0.714, RAUC = 1.5%, RTSS = 2.1%) and SVM (AUCmean = 0.899, TSSmean = 0.692, RAUC = 2.1%, RTSS = 2.3%). In addition, drainage density was the most important factor in flood susceptibility modeling. Accordingly, about 13.5% of the region was addressed as the high hazard zone of flood occurrence based on the DBN-PSO model, which should be considered for further pragmatic actions.

Suggested Citation

  • Eslam Satarzadeh & Amirpouya Sarraf & Hooman Hajikandi & Mohammad Sadegh Sadeghian, 2022. "Flood hazard mapping in western Iran: assessment of deep learning vis-à-vis machine learning models," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 111(2), pages 1355-1373, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:111:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-021-05098-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-021-05098-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-021-05098-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-021-05098-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kris A. Johnson & Oliver E. J. Wing & Paul D. Bates & Joseph Fargione & Timm Kroeger & William D. Larson & Christopher C. Sampson & Andrew M. Smith, 2020. "A benefit–cost analysis of floodplain land acquisition for US flood damage reduction," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 3(1), pages 56-62, January.
    2. Omid Rahmati & Hamid Reza Pourghasemi, 2017. "Identification of Critical Flood Prone Areas in Data-Scarce and Ungauged Regions: A Comparison of Three Data Mining Models," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(5), pages 1473-1487, March.
    3. Susan Athey, 2018. "The Impact of Machine Learning on Economics," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda, pages 507-547, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vijendra Kumar & Hazi Md. Azamathulla & Kul Vaibhav Sharma & Darshan J. Mehta & Kiran Tota Maharaj, 2023. "The State of the Art in Deep Learning Applications, Challenges, and Future Prospects: A Comprehensive Review of Flood Forecasting and Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-33, July.
    2. Sukanta Malakar & Abhishek K. Rai & Arun K. Gupta, 2023. "Earthquake risk mapping in the Himalayas by integrated analytical hierarchy process, entropy with neural network," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(1), pages 951-975, March.
    3. Ahmed M. Youssef & Ali M. Mahdi & Hamid Reza Pourghasemi, 2023. "Optimal flood susceptibility model based on performance comparisons of LR, EGB, and RF algorithms," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 115(2), pages 1071-1096, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Davide Viviano & Jelena Bradic, 2019. "Synthetic learner: model-free inference on treatments over time," Papers 1904.01490, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2022.
    2. Philippe Goulet Coulombe & Maxime Leroux & Dalibor Stevanovic & Stéphane Surprenant, 2022. "How is machine learning useful for macroeconomic forecasting?," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(5), pages 920-964, August.
    3. Michael C. Knaus, 2021. "A double machine learning approach to estimate the effects of musical practice on student’s skills," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 184(1), pages 282-300, January.
    4. Yucheng Yang & Zhong Zheng & Weinan E, 2020. "Interpretable Neural Networks for Panel Data Analysis in Economics," Papers 2010.05311, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2020.
    5. Panos Constantinides & Ola Henfridsson & Geoffrey G. Parker, 2018. "Introduction—Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 381-400, June.
    6. Ajay Agrawal & Joshua Gans & Avi Goldfarb, 2019. "Economic Policy for Artificial Intelligence," Innovation Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 19(1), pages 139-159.
    7. Galdo, Virgilio & Li, Yue & Rama, Martin, 2021. "Identifying urban areas by combining human judgment and machine learning: An application to India," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    8. Julien Boulange & Yukiko Hirabayashi & Masahiro Tanoue & Toshinori Yamada, 2023. "Quantitative evaluation of flood damage methodologies under a portfolio of adaptation scenarios," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 118(3), pages 1855-1879, September.
    9. Longbing Cao, 2021. "AI in Finance: Challenges, Techniques and Opportunities," Papers 2107.09051, arXiv.org.
    10. Castle, Jennifer L. & Doornik, Jurgen A. & Hendry, David F., 2021. "Modelling non-stationary ‘Big Data’," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 1556-1575.
    11. Li, Jiyuan & Li, Zihui & Zhang, Min, 2023. "CFOs’ facial trustworthiness and bank loan contracts," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 332-357.
    12. Koffi Dumor & Li Yao, 2019. "Estimating China’s Trade with Its Partner Countries within the Belt and Road Initiative Using Neural Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, March.
    13. Barkan, Oren & Benchimol, Jonathan & Caspi, Itamar & Cohen, Eliya & Hammer, Allon & Koenigstein, Noam, 2023. "Forecasting CPI inflation components with Hierarchical Recurrent Neural Networks," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 1145-1162.
    14. Michael A. Ribers & Hannes Ullrich, 2019. "Battling Antibiotic Resistance: Can Machine Learning Improve Prescribing?," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1803, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    15. Daniel Boller & Michael Lechner & Gabriel Okasa, 2021. "The Effect of Sport in Online Dating: Evidence from Causal Machine Learning," Papers 2104.04601, arXiv.org.
    16. Onder Ozgur & Erdal Tanas Karagol & Fatih Cemil Ozbugday, 2021. "Machine learning approach to drivers of bank lending: evidence from an emerging economy," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-29, December.
    17. Shruti Sachdeva & Bijendra Kumar, 2020. "A Comparative Study between Frequency Ratio Model and Gradient Boosted Decision Trees with Greedy Dimensionality Reduction in Groundwater Potential Assessment," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(15), pages 4593-4615, December.
    18. Maximilian Maurice Gail & Phil-Adrian Klotz, 2021. "The Impact of the Agency Model on E-book Prices: Evidence from the UK," MAGKS Papers on Economics 202111, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    19. Jau-er Chen & Chien-Hsun Huang & Jia-Jyun Tien, 2021. "Debiased/Double Machine Learning for Instrumental Variable Quantile Regressions," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-18, April.
    20. John Aoga & Juhee Bae & Stefanija Veljanoska & Siegfried Nijssen & Pierre Schaus, 2020. "Impact of weather factors on migration intention using machine learning algorithms," Papers 2012.02794, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:111:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-021-05098-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.