IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/metrik/v20y2010i3p249-268.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sind Gruppen die besseren Entscheider? – Experimentelle Evidenz am Beispiel simulierter Entscheidungen im Kontext der Lagerverwaltung

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Dudda
  • Kerstin Schmidt
  • Walter Schmitting
  • Andreas Wömpener

Abstract

Neben strategischen Entscheidungen gehören wiederkehrende Dispositionen unter Unsicherheit zu jenen Determinanten im betrieblichen Alltag, die den Unternehmenserfolg maßgeblich mitbestimmen. Bezüglich der Frage, ob solche Entscheidungen besser von Einzelpersonen oder Gruppen getroffen werden sollten, können auf Basis der Erkenntnisse der bisherigen Forschung nur bedingte Handlungsempfehlungen abgeleitet werden. Der vorliegende Beitrag setzt an den bestehenden Forschungsdefiziten an und gibt die Ergebnisse eines Laborexperiments wieder, das den Entscheidungserfolg von Gruppen und Einzelpersonen vergleicht. Das vorliegende Experiment zeigt, dass Gruppen bei wiederkehrenden Dispositionen signifikant rationaler entscheiden. Dieser Rationalitätsgewinn wird jedoch mit mehr Stress und Friktionen erkauft. Copyright Springer-Verlag 2010

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Dudda & Kerstin Schmidt & Walter Schmitting & Andreas Wömpener, 2010. "Sind Gruppen die besseren Entscheider? – Experimentelle Evidenz am Beispiel simulierter Entscheidungen im Kontext der Lagerverwaltung," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 249-268, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:metrik:v:20:y:2010:i:3:p:249-268
    DOI: 10.1007/s00187-009-0084-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00187-009-0084-5
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00187-009-0084-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elliott, W.B. & Hodge, F. & Kennedy, J.J. & Pronk, M., 2007. "Are MBA students a good proxy for nonprofessional investors?," Other publications TiSEM 20271f1d-d385-4122-a175-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Goodson, Brian M. & Grenier, Jonathan H. & Maksymov, Eldar, 2023. "When law students think like audit litigation attorneys: Implications for experimental research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    2. Elizabeth Almer & Audrey Gramling & Steven Kaplan, 2008. "Impact of Post-restatement Actions Taken by a Firm on Non-professional Investors’ Credibility Perceptions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 80(1), pages 61-76, June.
    3. Han, Jun, 2013. "A literature synthesis of experimental studies on management earnings guidance," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 49-70.
    4. Arnold, Vicky & Bedard, Jean C. & Phillips, Jillian R. & Sutton, Steve G., 2011. "Do section 404 disclosures affect investors' perceptions of information systems reliability and stock price predictions?," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 243-258.
    5. Ray Saadaoui Mallek & Mohamed Albaity, 2019. "Individual differences and cognitive reflection across gender and nationality the case of the United Arab Emirates," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1567965-156, January.
    6. Libby, Robert & Rennekamp, Kristina M. & Seybert, Nicholas, 2015. "Regulation and the interdependent roles of managers, auditors, and directors in earnings management and accounting choice," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 25-42.
    7. Maik Lachmann & Arnt Wöhrmann & Andreas Wömpener, 2011. "Acquisition and integration of fair value information on liabilities into investors' judgments," Review of Accounting and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(4), pages 385-410, November.
    8. Tan, Seet-Koh & Koonce, Lisa, 2011. "Investors’ reactions to retractions and corrections of management earnings forecasts," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 382-397.
    9. Foster, Benjamin P. & McClain, Guy & Shastri, Trimbak, 2010. "Impact on pre-and post-sarbanes oxley users’ perceptions by incorporating the auditor’s fraud detection responsibility into the auditor’s internal control report," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 107-113.
    10. Björn Röber, 2020. "Escalating internationalization decisions: intendedly rational, but only limitedly so?," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(2), pages 455-484, July.
    11. Jean S. Clarke & Joep P. Cornelissen & Mark Healey, 2019. "Actions Speak Louder than Words : How Figurative Language and Gesturing in Entrepreneurial Pitches Influences Investment Judgments," Post-Print hal-02276704, HAL.
    12. Yi Luo & Steven E. Salterio, 2022. "The Effect of Gender on Investors’ Judgments and Decision-Making," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(1), pages 237-258, August.
    13. El Ghoul, Sadok & Guedhami, Omrane & Pittman, Jeffrey, 2016. "Cross-country evidence on the importance of Big Four auditors to equity pricing: The mediating role of legal institutions," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 60-81.
    14. Andres Guiral & Doocheol Moon & Hun‐Tong Tan & Yao Yu, 2020. "What Drives Investor Response to CSR Performance Reports?," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(1), pages 101-130, March.
    15. Chen, Wei & Han, Jun & Tan, Hun-Tong, 2016. "Investor reactions to management earnings guidance attributions: The effects of news valence, attribution locus, and outcome controllability," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 83-95.
    16. Nigel Barradale & Thomas Plenborg & Simone Staehr, 2022. "Investor feedback: impact on analyst biases and investor critical evaluation," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(1), pages 767-803, March.
    17. Linda Espahbodi & Reza Espahbodi & Norma Juma & Amy Westbrook, 2019. "Sustainability priorities, corporate strategy, and investor behavior," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(1), pages 149-167, January.
    18. Anna M. Cianci & Shana M. Clor-Proell & Steven E. Kaplan, 2019. "How Do Investors Respond to Restatements? Repairing Trust Through Managerial Reputation and the Announcement of Corrective Actions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(2), pages 297-312, August.
    19. Fochmann, Martin & Müller, Nadja & Overesch, Michael, 2018. "Less cheating? The effects of prefilled forms on compliance behavior," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 227, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    20. Eddy Cardinaels & Stephan Hollander & Brian J. White, 2019. "Automatic summarization of earnings releases: attributes and effects on investors’ judgments," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 860-890, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Gruppenentscheidungen; Einzelentscheidungen; Gruppen; Entscheidungseffizienz; D79; M49;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D79 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Other
    • M49 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:metrik:v:20:y:2010:i:3:p:249-268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.