IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v31y2020i6d10.1007_s10845-019-01515-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-agent systems negotiation to deal with dynamic scheduling in disturbed industrial context

Author

Listed:
  • Tsegay Tesfay Mezgebe

    (Université de Lorraine
    Mekelle Univeristy)

  • Hind Bril El Haouzi

    (Université de Lorraine)

  • Guillaume Demesure

    (Université de Lorraine)

  • Remi Pannequin

    (Université de Lorraine)

  • Andre Thomas

    (Université de Lorraine)

Abstract

It is now accepted that using multi-agent systems improve the reactivity to treat perturbation(s) within flexible manufacturing system. Intelligent algorithms shall be used to address these perturbation(s) and all smart decision entities within their environment have to continuously negotiate until their common and final goal is achieved. This paper proposes a negotiation-based control approach to deal with variability on a manufacturing system. It has initially formulated and modeled an environment in which all contributing entities or agents operate, communicate, and interact with each other productively. Then after, simulation and applicability implementation experiments on the basis of full-sized academic experimental platform have been conducted to validate the proposed control approach. Product and resource entities negotiate considering different key performance measures in order to set best priority-based product sequencing. This has been done with expectations that the applicability of the negotiation-based decision-making will be more adaptable to deal with perturbation(s) than another alternative decision-making approach called pure reactive control approach. The result showed that negotiation among the decisional entities has brought significant improvement in reducing makespan and hence conveyed better global performance of a manufacturing system.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsegay Tesfay Mezgebe & Hind Bril El Haouzi & Guillaume Demesure & Remi Pannequin & Andre Thomas, 2020. "Multi-agent systems negotiation to deal with dynamic scheduling in disturbed industrial context," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(6), pages 1367-1382, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:31:y:2020:i:6:d:10.1007_s10845-019-01515-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-019-01515-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-019-01515-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-019-01515-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. El Haouzi, H. & Thomas, A. & Pétin, J.F., 2008. "Contribution to reusability and modularity of manufacturing systems simulation models: Application to distributed control simulation within DFT context," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 48-61, March.
    2. Carlos Herrera & Sana Belmokhtar-Berraf & André Thomas & Víctor Parada, 2016. "A reactive decision-making approach to reduce instability in a master production schedule," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(8), pages 2394-2404, April.
    3. Nagarajan, Mahesh & Sosic, Greys, 2008. "Game-theoretic analysis of cooperation among supply chain agents: Review and extensions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 719-745, June.
    4. Wei Xiong & Dongmei Fu, 2018. "A new immune multi-agent system for the flexible job shop scheduling problem," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 857-873, April.
    5. N.R. Jennings & P. Faratin & A.R. Lomuscio & S. Parsons & M.J. Wooldridge & C. Sierra, 2001. "Automated Negotiation: Prospects, Methods and Challenges," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 199-215, March.
    6. David J. Vander Veen & William C. Jordan, 1989. "Analyzing Trade-Offs Between Machine Investment and Utilization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(10), pages 1215-1226, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jorge E. Hernández & Josefa Mula & Raúl Poler & Andrew C. Lyons, 2014. "Collaborative Planning in Multi-tier Supply Chains Supported by a Negotiation-Based Mechanism and Multi-agent System," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 235-269, March.
    2. Matsui, Kenji, 2020. "Optimal bargaining timing of a wholesale price for a manufacturer with a retailer in a dual-channel supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(1), pages 225-236.
    3. Simai He & Jay Sethuraman & Xuan Wang & Jiawei Zhang, 2017. "A NonCooperative Approach to Cost Allocation in Joint Replenishment," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(6), pages 1562-1573, December.
    4. Jinsoo Park & Hamirahanim Abdul Rahman & Jihae Suh & Hazami Hussin, 2019. "A Study of Integrative Bargaining Model with Argumentation-Based Negotiation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-21, December.
    5. David C. Parkes & Jayant Kalagnanam, 2005. "Models for Iterative Multiattribute Procurement Auctions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(3), pages 435-451, March.
    6. Juan M. Alberola & Vicent Botti & Jose M. Such, 2014. "Advances in infrastructures and tools for multiagent systems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 163-167, April.
    7. Luyi Gui & Atalay Atasu & Özlem Ergun & L. Beril Toktay, 2016. "Efficient Implementation of Collective Extended Producer Responsibility Legislation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(4), pages 1098-1123, April.
    8. Palsule-Desai, Omkar D., 2015. "Cooperatives for fruits and vegetables in emerging countries: Rationalization and impact of decentralization," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 114-140.
    9. Melvin F. Shakun, 2005. "Multi-bilateral Multi-issue E-negotiation in E-commerce with a Tit-for-Tat Computer Agent," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 14(5), pages 383-392, September.
    10. Serkan Alacam & Asli Sencer, 2021. "Using Blockchain Technology to Foster Collaboration among Shippers and Carriers in the Trucking Industry: A Design Science Research Approach," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-24, June.
    11. Balachandran, Kashi R. & Wang, Hsiao-Wen & Li, Shu-Hsing & Wang, Taychang, 2013. "In-house capability and supply chain decisions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 473-484.
    12. Fine, Charles H. & Pappu, Suguna., 1990. "Flexible manufacturing technology and product-market competition," Working papers 3135-90., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    13. Fei Luan & Zongyan Cai & Shuqiang Wu & Shi Qiang Liu & Yixin He, 2019. "Optimizing the Low-Carbon Flexible Job Shop Scheduling Problem with Discrete Whale Optimization Algorithm," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-17, August.
    14. Kadipasaoglu, Sukran N. & Xiang, Wenuang & Hurley, Simon F. & Khumawala, Basheer M., 2000. "A study on the effect of the extent and location of protective capacity in flow systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 217-228, January.
    15. Madjid Tavana & Hannan Amoozad Mahdiraji & Moein Beheshti & Ali‐Asghar Abbasi Kamardi, 2020. "Optimal strategic alliance in multi‐echelon supply chains with open innovation," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(7), pages 1365-1384, October.
    16. Yuhong He & Saibal Ray & Shuya Yin, 2022. "Retail power in distribution channels: A double‐edged sword for upstream suppliers," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(6), pages 2681-2694, June.
    17. Lv, Wei & Li, Hongyi & Tang, Jiafu, 2017. "Bargaining model of labor disputes considering social mediation and bounded rationalityAuthor-Name: Liu, Dehai," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(3), pages 1064-1071.
    18. Lippman, Steven A. & McCardle, Kevin F. & Tang, Christopher S., 2013. "Using Nash bargaining to design project management contracts under cost uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 199-207.
    19. Nagurney, Anna & Shukla, Shivani, 2017. "Multifirm models of cybersecurity investment competition vs. cooperation and network vulnerability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(2), pages 588-600.
    20. Xin Chen & Jiawei Zhang, 2009. "A Stochastic Programming Duality Approach to Inventory Centralization Games," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(4), pages 840-851, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:31:y:2020:i:6:d:10.1007_s10845-019-01515-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.