IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v29y2018i2d10.1007_s10845-015-1113-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

MIP model and elitist strategy hybrid GA–SA algorithm for layout design

Author

Listed:
  • I. Jerin Leno

    (National College of Engineering)

  • S. Saravana Sankar

    (Kalasalingam University)

  • S. G. Ponnambalam

    (Monash University Malaysia)

Abstract

It is most important for any manufacturing industry to have an efficient layout for their production environment to participate in global competition. One of the prime objectives of such an organisation is to decide an optimal arrangement of their facilities (machines or departments) in a two-dimensional planar region satisfying desired objectives, which is termed facility layout problem. To overcome the drawbacks of traditional layout design methodology, it is attempted to solve three important layout design problems such as inter-cell layout design, determination of optimum location for input/output stations and flow path layout design of material handling system simultaneously in an integrated manner. The quality of the final layout is evaluated by minimizing the total material handling cost, where the perimeter distance metric is used for the distance measurement. Sequence-pair, an elegant representation technique is used for layout encoding. The translation from sequence-pair to layout is efficiently done by longest common subsequence computation methodology. Due to the non-polynomial hard nature of the problem considered, an elitist strategy based hybrid genetic algorithm that uses simulated annealing as local search mechanism (ESHGA) is developed and tested with test problem instances available in the literature. The results indicate that proposed integrated methodology with developed mixed integer programming based mathematical model along with ESHGA could generate realistic layouts compared to reported result.

Suggested Citation

  • I. Jerin Leno & S. Saravana Sankar & S. G. Ponnambalam, 2018. "MIP model and elitist strategy hybrid GA–SA algorithm for layout design," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 369-387, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:29:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s10845-015-1113-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-015-1113-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-015-1113-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-015-1113-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hani, Y. & Amodeo, L. & Yalaoui, F. & Chen, H., 2007. "Ant colony optimization for solving an industrial layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(2), pages 633-642, December.
    2. Scholz, Daniel & Jaehn, Florian & Junker, Andreas, 2010. "Extensions to STaTS for practical applications of the facility layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(3), pages 463-472, August.
    3. Yang, Taho & Peters, Brett A. & Tu, Mingan, 2005. "Layout design for flexible manufacturing systems considering single-loop directional flow patterns," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(2), pages 440-455, July.
    4. Solimanpur, M. & Vrat, P. & Shankar, R., 2004. "Ant colony optimization algorithm to the inter-cell layout problem in cellular manufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(3), pages 592-606, September.
    5. Samarghandi, Hamed & Eshghi, Kourosh, 2010. "An efficient tabu algorithm for the single row facility layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(1), pages 98-105, August.
    6. Scholz, Daniel & Jaehn, Florian & Junker, Andreas, 2010. "Extensions to STaTS for practical applications of the facility layout problem," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 39431, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    7. Stefan Helber & Daniel Böhme & Farid Oucherif & Svenja Lagershausen & Steffen Kasper, 2016. "A hierarchical facility layout planning approach for large and complex hospitals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 5-29, June.
    8. Kusiak, Andrew & Heragu, Sunderesh S., 1987. "The facility layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 229-251, June.
    9. Montreuil, Benoit & Ratliff, H. Donald, 1988. "Optimizing the location of input/output stations within facilities layout," Engineering Costs and Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 177-187, September.
    10. Hanif D. Sherali & Barbara M. P. Fraticelli & Russell D. Meller, 2003. "Enhanced Model Formulations for Optimal Facility Layout," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(4), pages 629-644, August.
    11. Kouvelis, Panagiotis & Kurawarwala, Abbas A. & Gutierrez, Genaro J., 1992. "Algorithms for robust single and multiple period layout planning for manufacturing systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 287-303, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Junqi Liu & Zeqiang Zhang & Feng Chen & Silu Liu & Lixia Zhu, 2022. "A novel hybrid immune clonal selection algorithm for the constrained corridor allocation problem," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 953-972, April.
    2. Shruti Shashikumar & Rakesh D. Raut & Vaibhav S. Narwane & Bhaskar B. Gardas & Balkrishna E. Narkhede & Anjali Awasthi, 2019. "A novel approach to determine the cell formation using heuristics approach," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(3), pages 628-656, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mariem Besbes & Marc Zolghadri & Roberta Costa Affonso & Faouzi Masmoudi & Mohamed Haddar, 2020. "A methodology for solving facility layout problem considering barriers: genetic algorithm coupled with A* search," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 615-640, March.
    2. Minhee Kim & Junjae Chae, 2019. "Monarch Butterfly Optimization for Facility Layout Design Based on a Single Loop Material Handling Path," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-21, February.
    3. Emde, Simon & Boysen, Nils, 2012. "Optimally locating in-house logistics areas to facilitate JIT-supply of mixed-model assembly lines," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 393-402.
    4. Keller, Birgit & Buscher, Udo, 2015. "Single row layout models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(3), pages 629-644.
    5. Gonçalves, José Fernando & Resende, Mauricio G.C., 2015. "A biased random-key genetic algorithm for the unequal area facility layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(1), pages 86-107.
    6. Komarudin & Wong, Kuan Yew, 2010. "Applying Ant System for solving Unequal Area Facility Layout Problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 730-746, May.
    7. Jerzy Grobelny & Rafal Michalski, 2015. "Comparative analysis of regular grid based algorithms in the design of graphical control panels," WORking papers in Management Science (WORMS) WORMS/15/03, Department of Operations Research and Business Intelligence, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology.
    8. Irawan, Chandra Ade & Song, Xiang & Jones, Dylan & Akbari, Negar, 2017. "Layout optimisation for an installation port of an offshore wind farm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(1), pages 67-83.
    9. Liu, Jingfa & Wang, Dawen & He, Kun & Xue, Yu, 2017. "Combining Wang–Landau sampling algorithm and heuristics for solving the unequal-area dynamic facility layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(3), pages 1052-1063.
    10. Saif Benjaafar & Sunderesh S. Heragu & Shahrukh A. Irani, 2002. "Next Generation Factory Layouts: Research Challenges and Recent Progress," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 32(6), pages 58-76, December.
    11. Hani, Y. & Amodeo, L. & Yalaoui, F. & Chen, H., 2007. "Ant colony optimization for solving an industrial layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(2), pages 633-642, December.
    12. Balakrishnan, Jaydeep & Cheng, Chun Hung, 1998. "Dynamic layout algorithms: a state-of-the-art survey," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 507-521, August.
    13. McKendall Jr., Alan R. & Hakobyan, Artak, 2010. "Heuristics for the dynamic facility layout problem with unequal-area departments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(1), pages 171-182, February.
    14. Lin, Jin-Ling & Foote, Bobbie & Pulat, Simin & Chang, Chir-Ho & Cheung, John Y., 1996. "Solving the failure-to-fit problem for plant layout: By changing department shapes and sizes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 135-146, February.
    15. Ioannou, George, 2006. "Time-phased creation of hybrid manufacturing systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 183-198, August.
    16. A. R. S. Amaral, 2022. "A heuristic approach for the double row layout problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(2), pages 1-36, September.
    17. Alexander Hübner & Heinrich Kuhn & Manuel Walther, 2018. "Combining clinical departments and wards in maximum-care hospitals," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 40(3), pages 679-709, July.
    18. André Rossi & Alexis Aubry & Mireille Jacomino, 2011. "A sensitivity analysis to assess the completion time deviation for multi-purpose machines facing demand uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 191(1), pages 219-249, November.
    19. Dahlbeck, Mirko & Fischer, Anja & Fischer, Frank & Hungerländer, Philipp & Maier, Kerstin, 2023. "Exact approaches for the combined cell layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(2), pages 530-546.
    20. Roy, Bernard, 2010. "Robustness in operational research and decision aiding: A multi-faceted issue," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(3), pages 629-638, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:29:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s10845-015-1113-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.