IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jknowl/v15y2024i4d10.1007_s13132-023-01659-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment Criteria of Innovations Risks: Analysis of Research Results

Author

Listed:
  • Anna M. Deptuła

    (Opole University of Technology)

Abstract

In the times marked by sustainable economic development, innovations form the basis for operations aimed at economic development. In order to secure their implementation and achieve the projected goals, an adequate risk assessment is necessary. The evaluation criteria utilized in practice include a wide range of analytical aspects, from legal regulations and requirements related to environmental impact assessment to technical and economic issues. The paper reports outcomes of research aimed at defining the priority criteria for assessing the risk of innovation and their updating in relation to the new conditions for the performance of enterprises related to, among others, with the COVID-19 pandemic. As a consequence of this, it will be possible to establish a new hierarchy of evaluation criteria that could significantly affect the decision-making processes regarding implementing or rejecting specific innovative projects. The paper presents the results of questionnaire responses that involved Polish innovators: experts, constructors/designers, entrepreneurs, and scientists. The study involved experts from various industries (among others: energy, production, and the food or wood industry).

Suggested Citation

  • Anna M. Deptuła, 2024. "Assessment Criteria of Innovations Risks: Analysis of Research Results," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(4), pages 15601-15617, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:15:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s13132-023-01659-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s13132-023-01659-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13132-023-01659-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13132-023-01659-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schiuma, Giovanni & Santarsiero, Francesco, 2023. "Innovation labs as organisational catalysts for innovation capacity development: A systematic literature review," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    2. Alison Mobey & David Parker, 2002. "Risk evaluation and its importance to project implementation," Work Study, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 51(4), pages 202-208, July.
    3. Feng Zhang & Haina Zhang & David H. Brown & Xile Yin, 2023. "Innovation and Performance of Manufacturing Firms in Aspirant Markets: An Institutional Environment Approach," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 435-482, June.
    4. Whittaker, Lucas & Mulcahy, Rory & Letheren, Kate & Kietzmann, Jan & Russell-Bennett, Rebekah, 2023. "Mapping the deepfake landscape for innovation: A multidisciplinary systematic review and future research agenda," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    5. Mohan V. Tatikonda & Mitzi M. Montoya-Weiss, 2001. "Integrating Operations and Marketing Perspectives of Product Innovation: The Influence of Organizational Process Factors and Capabilities on Development Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(1), pages 151-172, January.
    6. Belitski, Maksim & Rejeb, Nada, 2022. "Does open customer innovation model hold for family firms?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 334-346.
    7. Carmona-Lavado, Antonio & Gimenez-Fernandez, Elena M. & Vlaisavljevic, Vesna & Cabello-Medina, Carmen, 2023. "Cross-industry innovation: A systematic literature review," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    8. Audretsch, David Bruce & Belitski, Maksim & Guerrero, Maribel, 2022. "The dynamic contribution of innovation ecosystems to schumpeterian firms: A multi-level analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 975-986.
    9. Anna M. Deptula & Czeslaw S. Nosal, 2021. "Innovator Behavior Questionnaire as an Expert Selecting for Technical Innovation Risk Assessment," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 107-119.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. DOGAN,Mesut & DOGAN,Husna, 2020. "Knowledge Sharing, Innovation And Firm Performance: Evidence From Turkey," Studii Financiare (Financial Studies), Centre of Financial and Monetary Research "Victor Slavescu", vol. 24(1), pages 36-52, March.
    2. Cheng, Cheng-Feng & Chang, Man-Ling & Li, Chu-Shiu, 2013. "Configural paths to successful product innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2561-2573.
    3. Li, Zhaochen & Xu, Zimu, 2025. "Digital technology and innovation:The impact of blockchain application on enterprise innovation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    4. Saurabh A. Lall & Li-Wei Chen & Dyana P. Mason, 2023. "Digital platforms and entrepreneurial support: a field experiment in online mentoring," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(2), pages 631-654, August.
    5. Szutowski Dawid, 2019. "Management Control Systems and Innovation Process Efficiency. A Conceptual Model," Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Sciendo, vol. 19(2), pages 160-175, December.
    6. Jimmi Normann Kristiansen & Frank Gertsen, 2015. "Is Radical Innovation Management Misunderstood? Problematising The Radical Innovation Discipline," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(06), pages 1-23, December.
    7. Seonghye Lee & Hae Young Oh & Jeongil Choi, 2020. "Service Design Management and Organizational Innovation Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    8. Jessica Alzamora-Ruiz & María Fuentes-Fuentes & Myriam Martinez-Fiestas, 2021. "Together or separately? Direct and synergistic effects of Effectuation and Causation on innovation in technology-based SMEs," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1917-1943, December.
    9. Li-Ren Yang & Jieh-Haur Chen & Kun-Shan Wu & Di-Man Huang & Cheng-Hao Cheng, 2015. "A framework for evaluating relationship among HRM practices, project success and organizational benefit," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 1039-1061, May.
    10. Naciba Haned & Caroline Mothe & Thuc Uyen Nguyen-Thi, 2014. "Firm persistence in technological innovation: the relevance of organizational innovation," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(5-6), pages 490-516, September.
    11. Horn, Philipp & Scheffler, Paul & Schiele, Holger, 2014. "Internal integration as a pre-condition for external integration in global sourcing: A social capital perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 54-65.
    12. Rodríguez-Pinto, Javier & Carbonell, Pilar & Rodríguez-Escudero, Ana I., 2011. "Speed or quality? How the order of market entry influences the relationship between market orientation and new product performance," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 145-154.
    13. Nieto, María Jesús & Santamaria, Luis & Bammens, Yannick, 2023. "Digitalization as a facilitator of open innovation: Are family firms different?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    14. Welsh, Dianne H.B. & Lanchimba, Cintya & Bausch, Madeleine, 2025. "Retail franchise ecosystem dynamics: Insights from countries of varied development levels," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    15. Jose Montes & Aglaya Batz & Lizeth Fernanda Serrano Cárdenas, 2024. "A taxonomy of innovation spaces from the innovation networks lens," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, December.
    16. Atif Açıkgöz & Irem Demirkan & Gary P. Latham & Cemil Kuzey, 2021. "The Relationship Between Unlearning and Innovation Ambidexterity with the Performance of New Product Development Teams," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 945-982, August.
    17. Annika Lorenz & Michael Raven & Knut Blind, 2019. "The role of standardization at the interface of product and process development in biotechnology," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 1097-1133, August.
    18. Chang, Woojung, 2019. "The joint effects of customer participation in various new product development stages," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 259-268.
    19. Maiga, Adam S. & Nilsson, Anders & Ax, Christian, 2015. "Relationships between internal and external information systems integration, cost and quality performance, and firm profitability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 422-434.
    20. Mohsen Jafari Songhori & Madjid Tavana & Takao Terano, 2020. "Product development team formation: effects of organizational- and product-related factors," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 88-122, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:15:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s13132-023-01659-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.